X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,3150eb4f1810a6a4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-15 07:37:25 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: vaps4zh@prism.gatech.edu (Zellyn) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii Subject: Talk/Line: Sword Date: 14 Nov 1994 16:57:38 -0600 Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 44 Sender: boba@gagme.wwa.com Approved: boba@wwa.com Message-ID: <3a8q12$pa2@gagme.wwa.com> References: <39qtfu$deb@gagme.wwa.com> <3a66pg$co1@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com David Stevenson (ad195@freenet.unbc.edu) wrote: : Would a broadsword be acceptable? : / ___________________________________ : <\______________ || \ : <= CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC| }=============================-------> : Hear this, hear this: Any brave knight who wishes to win the princesses hand in marriage must first navigate his inflatable raft through the rapids, and then beat the royal team in a game of cricket! On my screen, that's *quite* a broad sword! How's this, just for an idea? (Probably looks like a rapier on your screen! ;-) / <\______________ ||_____________________________________ <= CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC| }=============================-------`>