X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,100c32d8966fe27d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,100c32d8966fe27d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-Thread: 110f55,100c32d8966fe27d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-08 07:09:30 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: boba@wwa.com (Bob Allison)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii
Subject: Question: Should "Font" be added to subject IDs
Date: 7 Nov 1994 19:47:27 -0600
Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services 312-282-8605
 708-367-1871
Lines: 23
Approved: boba@wwa.com
Message-ID: <39mlbf$laa@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
Xref: nntp.gmd.de rec.arts.ascii:2681 alt.ascii-art:16412


   I have hesitated to add a "Font" subject ID, because it wouldn't be
good to have too many.  But it seems like it makes sense.

   On the one hand, a font can be line art or a Figlet font, so there can
be IDs like:

Line: Fiddler's Font
Binary: fiddlers.flf font

   These are OK, but fonts are popular and different enough to seem to
justify a "Font" subject ID.  What do you think?

--
../"""""" ./"""" ./""""" ./"""""" ./""""" ./"""" /"""""" ../""""" ./"" /"" /""
./""""""" /""""" /""""""" /""""""" /""""" /""""" /""""""" /""""""" /"" /"" /""
./"" ...../"" .../"" ./"" /"" ./"" /"" .../"" .../"" ./"" /"" ./"" /"" /"" /""
./"""""" ./"" .../""""""" /"""""" ./"""" ./"" .../"""""" ./"" ./"" /"" /"" /""
../"""""" /"" .../""""""" /""""" ../"""" ./"" .../""""" ../"" ./"" /"" /"" /""
....../"" /"" .../"" ./"" /"" /"" ./"" .../"" .../"" /"" ./"" ./"" /"" /"" /""
./""""""" /""""" /"" ./"" /"" ./"" /""""" /""""" /"" ./"" /""""""" /""""""""""
./"""""" ../"""" /"" ./"" /"" ./"" /""""" ./"""" /"" ./"" ./""""" ../""""""""
..............................................................................