X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,17229c713daec0bb X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,5c513960de185043 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-10 09:51:07 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: Out of Order Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art Subject: Talk: Dvorak-QWERTY, domain name Date: 10 Oct 1994 11:45:45 -0500 Organization: precious little Lines: 31 Sender: boba@wwa.com Approved: boba@wwa.com Message-ID: <37br3p$nsc@sashimi.wwa.com> References: <367pbd$897@gagme.wwa.com> <36k88a$4op@sashimi.wwa.com> <371g6t$50r@sashimi.wwa.com> <377lkl$aur@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sashimi.wwa.com Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:2008 alt.ascii-art:12828 i921651@redgum.ucnv.edu.au writes: > How does the dvorak go when using editers like vi? ie. movement keys. > Having never seen a dvorak, could someone post the key layout? Dunno, don't use it, but here's the layout, according to a document from an FTP site mentioned somewhere on this thread: ' , . p y f g c r l a o e u i d h t n s <-- home row ; q j k x b m w v z LEFT HAND RIGHT HAND Looks like h, j, k and l are where we have j, c, v and p. Not too handy, but you'd get used to it (oh, the double horror of learning Dvorak and using vi simultaneously...). > >IMHO, Scarecrow.com sounds a lot classier than boba.com > My thoughts exactly. " " " " " __ ___ __ __ _ ___ _ ___ _ ___ _ ___ _ __ __ ___ __ |_| _| / | |_| / \. _| / \. | | | / \ | | | ./ \ |_ ./ \ |_| | \ |_ |_| / | __| \_| / | \_/ | \_/ | |_| \_/ |_| | \_/ | \_/ | \ |_/ |__ | \ ude.cmh@sleumasp psamuels@hmc.edu (nosleumaS reteP r(O)r Peter Samuelson) [October 17 -- It's Time! Ask me for details!]