X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,2bd785c0133963fb
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-11 16:18:37 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: flee@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Subject: Talk: 3D layers of trees
Date: 11 Oct 1994 17:25:07 -0500
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Lines: 10
Sender: boba@wwa.com
Approved: boba@wwa.com
Message-ID: <37f3c3$158@gagme.wwa.com>
References: <379g8j$c1h@sashimi.wwa.com> <37bt62$8sc@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com


Paul Foerster:
>... i don't know what your problem is. To me it looks pretty well in both 2D 
>_AND_ 3D.

that was partly what I was trying for.  It's just, it didn't really
match my vision of what I wanted to make.  Partly, the back layer
isn't dense enough.  And I think I wanted another layer or two, but I
ran out of room by the time I reached the back.
--