X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd588,a912eb9a650b977a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd588,public X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,17229c713daec0bb X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,5c513960de185043 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,5c513960de185043 X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-02 14:55:54 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: boba@wwa.com (Bob Allison) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii,alt.ascii-art.animation Subject: Talk: Dvorak, domain name, sysadmins (Hi Greg & Dave) Date: 2 Oct 1994 16:51:35 -0500 Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services 312-282-8605 Lines: 78 Approved: boba@wwa.com Message-ID: <36na17$imm@sashimi.wwa.com> References: <367pbd$897@gagme.wwa.com> <36lef7$373@sashimi.wwa.com> <36lfgr$f1l@gagme.wwa.com> <36n8tq$h6n@sashimi.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sashimi.wwa.com Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1886 alt.ascii-art:12553 alt.binaries.pictures.ascii:1255 In article <36n8tq$h6n@sashimi.wwa.com>, Ryan Tucker wrote: > >Bob Allison (boba@wwa.com) wrote: >> It blows my mind that a system that was made to be bad is the >> absolute, and I mean complete, total standard. There have been, and >> there are, alternatives, but they are almost non-existant. I couldn't >> imagine typing with QWERTY. I guess I'm in an extremely small minority. > >QWERTY is still taught in school typing courses (at least here). The >main reason is because they like to use the computers "out of the box", >and don't have time or money to change the keyboards. And, most >businesses have QWERTY keyboards, so to create more productive workers, >they teach QWERTY. Is it true that QWERTY causes more long term damage to the hands? >(it's quite easy once you get the hang of it ... I can easily type over >100 wpm on a good keyboard) > >> >> I will probably use boba.com. Should take about a month to get it, >> >> and a couple more weeks to set up the automation (providing my guru is >> >> available at that time). >> > >> >Aww, I liked scarecrow.com :-) > >> It still has an outside chance. I haven't sent the form in yet. So, >> it's still in there, wigling away. > >Here's an idea... how about a vote? The majority of mail I got said boba.com, and I like it too, so I picked boba.com. >> >What platform are you doing the automation on? Unix, for example, would >> >be much easier than DOS for that sort of thing. > >> It would be set up on my Unix host, WorldWide Access. They are the >> nice folks who provide services for the newsgroup, FTP site, Web pages, >> and will provide services for the automated requests and digest. > >Wow -- your provider sounds great! What software are you planning on >using for the automated requests and digests? Or will it be custom-made? Haven't gotten to that yet. Probably in a couple of weeks. >> If you have a second, you might want to send a thank you to my >> sysadmin, Greg Gulik at greg@wwa.com or Dave Vrona at dave@wwa.com, or to >> both of them! It only takes a few second, and it certainly doesn't hurt. >> Sysadmins do a lot of work, and usually only hear from people when they >> want something, or when something needs fixing. It can make their day to >> get an email pat on the back. > >System administration doesn't get much recognition. They sit in the >background and fix things, and most of the time you never see 'em in >person. Sysadmins are pretty neat folks :-) Why that's what mine have been telling me for years. :^) >I sent that message... for once, they'll have something other than >reports of broken software in their mailbox on Monday :-) Yeah, maybe now is a good time for me to ask for a dedicated line. :^) -- . + ' . * . . ' ) . + . . ____ _____ ___ . ____ . _____ ' .+ . * '. * / __/ /____/ /__ \ ' /__ \ '/____/ . * ' . + . '+ ' .( ( + __' . __| |.* ___) / ____' ' + . .' .' \ \' / / . ,/,/| | ./ _/. / __/ ' . ' . + : ' . * '____) )/ /__ ,/ /__| | / /\ \ / /__' _____ ____ _______' __ __ __ /_____//____//________|/_/ /_/'/____/ /____/ /__ \ '/ ___ /./ /'/ /./ / ' .+ . * ' . : __ . + ___) /. / /. / / / / / / / /. . ' * . + ' . */ /. '/ _/ / /'*/ /'/ /./ /*/ /. ' . ' ( . ' : + / /__ / /\ \'./ /__/ / / /_/ /_/ / + ' '. .+ .' * ' ./____/ /_/ /_/ /______/+/_________/ .' . * ' . ' . '+ . ' * . ' ( + '. :