X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,db5d15f729eff333 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,db5d15f729eff333 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,db5d15f729eff333 X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-25 20:49:33 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: ogre@netcom.com (Joe Rumsey) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Talk-line: 2 line smilies Followup-To: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Date: 25 Sep 1994 22:45:24 -0500 Organization: the crossroads Lines: 52 Sender: boba@wwa.com Approved: boba@wwa.com Message-ID: <365g4k$48g@gagme.wwa.com> References: <361tsn$40o@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1780 alt.ascii-art:12320 alt.binaries.pictures.ascii:1197 Bob Allison (boba@wwa.com) wrote: : I have taken to using a variation on the standard :-) that is meant to : be viewed vertically, not sideways. It is this ^_^ smiley. Still 1 line. It doesn't look a smiley. 1 line but unrecognizeable can't be good, can it? : Then soon after, I started using a much more pleasing 2 line version. : It is generally best used at the end of a paragraph, so that the blank : line between can be used, like this. ^ u ^ : `-_-' Not much better... : Does anybody have any variations on this? I'm sure something like : this has been posted, and I may even have some of them somewhere, but I : thought it would be easier to just ask. Three lines? oo Ox ** \/ 00 -- < < < < < < \/ _/ -- /\ O - Etc. Years ago I used to call a 7 line chat BBS run on an Apple ][, these were quite common there. I don't recall seeing them since... Wish I'd saved more of 'em oo > /\ Suppose you can take the nose out, but they don't look nearly as good. Maybe some wider ones.. ()() [][] ( ] \__/ |__| ()() <-- These look good to me --> <><> \__/ \__/ Joe