X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,768bc30a98c36c3e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
From: Dave@cris.com (David Mussulman)
Subject: Talk-line: Sig
Date: 1995/06/22
Message-ID: <3sd3dr$r35@miso.wwa.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 104851890
approved: boba@wwa.com
sender: boba@miso.wwa.com
references: <3s4p1f$oiq@miso.wwa.com> <3s7l27$251@miso.wwa.com>
 <3s8546$659@miso.wwa.com> <3sar0l$78i@miso.wwa.com>
organization: Concentric Internet Services
newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii


Paul Guertin (guertinp@IRO.UMontreal.CA) wrote:

: >       \_o_/
: > ||---+--/+---+---+---+---+---||
: > ||-+---/\--+---+---+---+---+-||
: > ||---+/-/+---+---+---+---+---||
: > ||               Q           ||
: > ||                \o__/~     ||
: >                  ./   \/

: Ouch. That barbed-wire net is a little too dangerous for my tastes. ;)

Agreed, Paul.  But what do you suggest for the net?  Everything I've 
tried has come out really weird.

       \_o_/
 ||[][][]/][][][][][][][][][][||
 ||][][]/\[][][][][][][][][][]||
 ||[][]/]/][][][][][][][][][][||
 ||               Q           ||
 ||                \o__/~     ||
                  ./   \/

Hmmm...  Do you think that looks more like chain-links or brickwork?  =)  
Any ideas?

Dave