TALKING ABOUT TALK It's the last warm night for a while and so feeling a litle too over energic go to sleep I figured I'd yabber at the internet, or not seeing as Aussies.space still isn't working again yet. So I'm coming to from that old 486 laptop I keep in my bedroom that doesn't like the cold. I thought I'd try the teenager posture - lying stomache down on bed with a pilow under my chest and leaning up to the keyboard, but I don't think it's going to last because it's a strain on the shoulders and frankly male getitalia are in the wrong position for this stance. Actually that makes me think, most over energetic, and frankly sexually frustrated, people probably have a different use for a laptop while on their bed. But I'm going to write about methods of human communication. The idea of synchronous and asynchronous communications is something that I think about a lot. I always tend to avoid synchronous communication wherever possible. Phone calls, IRC, even talking in person, are all offputting. Partly it's because I like to be exact in my meaning and I hate the potential for miscommunication when I don't have time to compose things thoughtfully, but to a large extent it's also something of a lack of confidence that I have in myself. I don't really trust myself not to get talked into things and really control my own voice in a conversation unless I have lots of time to consider each exchange. Often, such as on Usenet and to a lesser extent here, I actually conclude that there's no point saying anything in the first place. That's mostly what I do in real life conversations as well, and in a way I respect myself more for staying quiet much of the time because it always strikes me that there's very little point to the vast majority of the talk that goes on in the world. But then there are the other people who favour instant communication. They prefer to phone up support lines rather than send emails when things go wrong, and use IRC, as well as the more in-between services like Twitter and SMS. I'm not sure whether I'm right, but I've come to think of these preferences as a fairly fundamental identifier of the type of person someone is overall. I feel like the synchronous people are the more scatter brained sorts, unreliable and scarilly unpredictable, but also intimmidating in that they can arrange things quickly and adaptively, whereas I plod along ditherring at every stage. I'm truely a little scared of the synchronous type of person. Also, I often feel like they're in the majority. Maybe I'm wrong here too, but I feel like the embrace of things like Twitter and Facebook over Usenet emphasises a preference for faster moving discussion. I'm surely abnormally unwilling to contribute to in-person group discussions. Well I can't think of a good conclusion for this. I'm more tired now, and there are little bugs that have squeezed through the fly screen on the open bedroom window which are driving me nuts. So I'll leave this on that slightly down note and do my pre-bed push ups before entering into that distinctly uncommunicative state that all sorts of people, asynchronous or otherwise, share nightly. - The Free Thinker