Subj : Re: .22 SAA
To   : JIMMY ANDERSON
From : Moondog
Date : Fri May 29 2020 10:00 pm

  Re: Re: .22 SAA
  By: JIMMY ANDERSON to MOONDOG on Fri May 29 2020 02:01 am

 > -=> MOONDOG wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
 > 
 >  MO> In any hobby there will be some snobbery regards to brand recognition,
 >  MO> however some brands or specific models earn their reputation, good or
 >  MO> bad.
 > 
 >  MO> Materials and treatment processes determine cost as well as
 >  MO> manufacturing techniques.  Quality control and manufacturing tolerances
 >  MO> also affect price.
 > 
 > Agreed! In another post, I mentioned doing a polishing of the internal
 > parts on my M&P Shield. I don't think it's BAD that I need to do this,
 > because if S&W did it themselves on every gun... Well, I wouldn't have
 > been able to get it for what I paid for it. :-)
 > 
 >  MO> I was watching an interview with the owner of Cimmaron Arms, and his
 >  MO> company m akes replicas of Old West era revolvers.  If you were a SASS
 >  MO> competition shooter, you'd want a replica over a real Colt Single
 >  MO> Action Army because of the modern materials and construction methods.
 >  MO> A vintage SAA's lifespan may have been 500 rounds before requiring
 >  MO> parts service, while 500 rounds is a couple weeks' practice for a
 >  MO> modern replica.
 > 
 > LOL - yeah, I can see that. :-)
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ... I have a mind like a steel... uh... thingy.

My Performance Center M&P C.O.R.E. shoots fine out of the box.

---
 þ Synchronet þ The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net

.