Subj : Re: .22 SAA
To   : Zombie Mambo
From : Moondog
Date : Wed Jun 17 2020 12:24 pm

  Re: Re: .22 SAA
  By: Zombie Mambo to JIMMY ANDERSON on Tue Jun 16 2020 07:02 pm

 >   Re: Re: .22 SAA
 >   By: JIMMY ANDERSON to ZOMBIE MAMBO on Sun May 17 2020 03:39 am
 > 
 >  > And speaking of cheap guns, any thougts from ya'll on SCCY? I've seen the
 >  > in the stores and dismissed them as 'cheap' guns, but I've heard advertis
 >  > on podcasts where they talk about the lifetime warrenty - that DOES trans
 >  > to anyone else that owns it!
 >  >
 >  > Not that I'm planning to trade my S&W M&P Shield .40 in on one, but it
 >  > got me to thinking maybe I've been dismissing them too easily...
 >  >
 >  >  ZM> I have to admit tho I like the cheap guns AND the nice ones.
 > 
 > I haven't had any experience with SCCY so couldn't comment on that.
 > Regarding the high point, my brother says it shoots fine. Which to me doesn'
 > carry much weight. :)
 > 
 > I am guessing like my old Lorcin .380 ($89 new) it probably is mechanically
 > sound, a bit heavy, not very asthetic, and gets the job done which is all yo
 > really want in something like that.
 > 
 > Basically the cobra .380 i have is in the same category, same price range.
 > I debated over the 9mm S&W Shield, and the 9mm Nano for my first CCW arm.
 > I opted for the Ruger LC9 because it was handgun of the year like two years
 > earlier, and i liked its specs. I have a red dot on it, and got the camo NRA
 > edition. It's nice. But honestly i like to carry my Glock .42 (.380) better.
 > 
 > 
 > Thanks,
 > Zombie Mambo
 > 
The Nano is very bare bones in design. What freaked me out was it didn't have
a lever to lock the slide back.  SCCY's have a good warranty and customer
service.  I think I mentioned before where a friend took his with him to
Florida, and was passing by their company HQ.  While they worked on his
pistol, he got a tour of the plant.


---
 þ Synchronet þ The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net

.