Subj : Re: 3d printing
To   : Moondog
From : Vk3jed
Date : Mon Sep 23 2019 11:12 am

-=> On 09-22-19 16:06, Moondog wrote to Vk3jed <=-

 Mo> The company making the claims would support their quality claims by
 Mo> showing loads of graphs depicting frequency reponse and attenutation,
 Mo> however Randi said that was immaterial since he wanted a human
 Mo> "expert"to tell them apart in a blind test, not an oscilloscope.  They

Well, the product is marketed for use by humans, so actual double blind
listening tests makes the most sense.

 Mo> may have been better in the ways of materials and manufacturing,
 Mo> however the doubt was if their $500 cable was more noticeable than a
 Mo> $25 cable.  The audio guy I worked with said price was no concern,
 Mo> since a guy spending $10k on a set of speakers isn't going to bother
 Mo> with nickle and diming over the price of a cable.

Yes, I reckon they would easily sell them.  Me?  I have too much Scots in my
ancestry.  I'm prepared to spend money for quality, but I'd still pay $50-$100
for decent electrical cable (copper is still somewhat expensive) than wasting
$500 on something of dubious benefit. 


.... A wholesome mind is wasted potential.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.51
 þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia.  freeway.apana.org.au

.