Subj : Re: California Gun Laws
To   : kc2ugv
From : Bbsing.Bbs
Date : Fri Jan 13 2017 03:56 am

-=> kc2ugv wrote to bbsing.bbs <=-

 bb> That would be insane if people had to go that route. I could just see
 bb> any use of such being classified as terror right out of the gate.
 bb>

 kc> Name a state where the right to own a gun has been taken away, or any
 kc> state where it's even been proposed?


I don't know of a state that has removed the right to own a gun. I also don't
know all the laws, but this is what I've heard but not totally confirmed. Some
fellons after they've served their sentence can no longer purchase a gun
legally. I think it may even apply to owning a gun. 

I heard multiple states restrict fellons even after they've served for their
crimes. Now I get that a majority of fellons are repeat offenders and are
likely to commit similar crimes they have in the past (violent), so I get the
desire to curtail rights in those circumstances. The kicker is fellons and
other criminals who perpatrate crimes using weapons (against the law) don't
follow laws but use weapons to commit crimes against people who usually don't
have weapons. I don't see how laws prevent crimes that are the antithesis to
law abiding.

Are fellons considered in your 	question? 

I do know there are restrictions on types of guns and munitions. 

I do know there is legislature now attempting to constrain rights concerning
magazine types and designs. 

This is what I don't understand why pass laws that have no deterant against
those who have no intention of following them, when the very nature of the law
only hurts those who follow it?

Some look at it this way, if its my right to own a gun why do I have to have a
background check to purchase one.

So if its my right to own a gun (type not widthstanding) then there should be
no issue with me making a gun. 

We know this right now the plans for weapon creation by regular citizens has be
removed from the internet via legal means. 

There are a lot of restrictions on guns. Like you can own one but you can't
carry it openly in some states. 

Look at your right to speach ... and compare that right with your right to bear
arms. The right to bear arms isn't specific to guns but guns are considered
arms or armerments. 

So its a very interesting debate. 

sorry for the spelling and grammer errors. 
 
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
 þ Synchronet þ Electronic Warfare BBS | telnet://bbs.ewbbs.net

.