(DIR) Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Chainsaw Repair
 (HTM) https://chainsawrepair.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
 (DIR) Return to: Partner
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 71521--------------------------------------------------
       A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: April 29, 2016, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Early last year an old Partner came to me with her CDI unit
       broken, she was R417T manufactured from 1974 according to Mike's
       site.
 (HTM) http://www.acresinternet.com/cscc.nsf/ed1d619968136da688256af40002b8f7/9eda198b7f2281e588256afd004bb92e?OpenDocument
       (Mike's site shows her displacement as 85cc but it's not
       correct, may be 55cc. )
       Here showing videos of first experiment, some modification to
       the capacitor, and the last one with a small and simple circuit
       for this homemade CDI.
       1:
 (HTM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOu8ocmSQY8
       2:
 (HTM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m25HGBV9trw
       3:
 (HTM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XSMr7vu3yo
       --------------
       Chy
       #Post#: 71554--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: April 30, 2016, 5:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here showing a segment from IPL below.
       She has two coils,
       one for
       a) pulser coil and exciter coil
       the other for
       b) primary coil and secondary coil.
       #Post#: 71555--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: April 30, 2016, 5:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And a schematic here;
       A couple of pink stuffs in the schematic is oscillo proves, not
       the parts of the circuit.
       #Post#: 71559--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: April 30, 2016, 8:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here it is the circuit for it.
       This circuit sits under the flywheel cover.
       #Post#: 71583--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: sharkey Date: May 1, 2016, 6:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       WOW.  Good Job!  Can you tell us how to get rid of the limiters
       on the cdi's used on these newer saw engines?  They usually
       start to drop spark around 12,500 rpm and make it really tough
       to tune.
       #Post#: 71595--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: May 2, 2016, 6:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello Sharkey, thank you for visiting and leaving a nice and
       interesting tip, but I did not know things about limiters on
       today's saws. My saws are mostly very old except for Husky
       550XP.
       Do you have a schematic of these limiters?
       #Post#: 71637--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: chy_farm Date: May 4, 2016, 8:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >I did not know things about limiters on today's saws. My saws
       are mostly very old except for Husky 550XP.
       >Do you have a schematic of these limiters?
       Doesn't any body have better information about this schematic?
       Chy
       #Post#: 71638--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: 3000 FPS Date: May 4, 2016, 10:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok very nice and good work.
       I have a few questions.   First the pink on the schematic is
       that for the Oscilloscope probes.
       Second does the 1 microfarad capacitor have a faster discharge
       time over the 2.2  microfarad cap and hence affecting the
       timing.
       You might want to coat all your components in epoxy to protect
       them from moisture and oil.
       Could you go to a larger working voltage on the capacitor to
       prevent it from getting to hot when making long cuts.
       Also did you wind the pulser coil your self.
       How high in the RPM's will this circuit be good for.    Like say
       up to 14,000 or more.
       Some great info and is good to know you can always come up with
       an ignition for an old saw.
       #Post#: 71639--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: 3000 FPS Date: May 4, 2016, 10:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I do not know of any schematics for ignitions that have limiting
       coils.    Besides those coils are all incased with epoxy and I
       doubt that you could get into one to modify it in any way.
       If you could get into one of the newer limiting coils and since
       these ignition systems are solid state devices there is probably
       a component in there that could be changed so that the RPM range
       could be made to go higher.
       #Post#: 71641--------------------------------------------------
       Re: A simple CDI unit for Partner
       By: 3000 FPS Date: May 4, 2016, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I also noticed that in your first schematic at the end of your
       video you use a SCR to discharge the capacitor into the ignition
       coil.
       On your second schematic you use two transistors to discharge
       the capacitor into the ignition coil.
       Just two different ways to do the same thing or is there a
       reason that one is preferred over the other due to reliability
       or something else.
       Also the first one looks to be much more simple in design than
       the second one.
       *****************************************************
 (DIR) Next Page