(DIR) Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       MS Speaks
 (HTM) https://msspeaks.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
 (DIR) Return to: BOOKS
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 521--------------------------------------------------
       Holland, WEEKENDS AT BELLEVUE:  NINE YEARS ON THE NIGHT SHIFT AT
        THE PSYCH ER 
       By: agate Date: October 18, 2014, 12:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Julie Holland, MD, WEEKENDS AT BELLEVUE:  NINE YEARS ON THE
       NIGHT SHIFT AT THE PSYCHIATRIC ER (2009)
       Julie Holland, MD, became a psychiatrist and landed a post as
       the weekend attending physician in the Bellevue CPEP
       (Comprehensive Psychiatric  Emergency Program, the psychiatric
       ER at Bellevue)—a position she stayed in for 9 years, until,
       after having two children, the lure of the comparative safety of
       motherhood, home and hearth—and a (probably lucrative) private
       practice led her to quit.
       This book purports to be about her weekends at Bellevue.
       We do get to know about some of the patients she saw—probably
       the more sensationally lurid ones, like the man who had
       concealed a razor in his rectum. But all too much of the book is
       given over to miscellaneous details from the author's life: her
       first colonoscopy, a well-nigh interminable account of her first
       labor, and later a description of the very scientific way she
       and her husband went about trying to conceive their second
       child. We also get passages about her association with
       actor/monologist Spalding Gray. We become aware that she and her
       family have not only a Manhattan apartment but a country house
       as well. She makes it clear from the outset that one attraction
       of working intensive weekends at Bellevue (a couple of 15-hour
       shifts) for her was that she would have her week free to do
       whatever she wanted.
       Fair enough, and understandable, particularly for someone in a
       high-stress job such as hers must have been. But how is she
       performing on that high-stress job? After the catastrophe of
       9/11, she wants to find out if she’s needed at the hospital, and
       says she spent 30 hours on the phone trying to reach the
       hospital. She didn’t go in until days later. In fact, days after
       9/11, she decides to get her nails done: “’I haven’t had a
       manicure in months.’” She spends the days after 9/11 kayaking
       and hiking in the woods.
       She doesn’t soon leave her world of cocktail parties, Cape Cod,
       and sailing just because emergency personnel might be in great
       demand during  a national disaster.
       At another time she tells a patient she’s giving him the
       Methadone he’d requested but actually intentionally gives  him
       the very powerful (and often dangerous) drug Thorazine even
       though she knows that lying to a patient about what medicine
       she’s giving is against the law. She seems almost proud of
       herself for being flexible enough to do something like
       this—mostly to accommodate a cop who wants this man sedated to a
       “dead weight.”
       She makes it clear that she’s often in danger as an ER doc at
       Bellevue. She gets threatening phone calls and anonymous
       suggestive phone calls. She’s afraid she’ll bump into a rapist.
       One patient punches her.
       OK, it’s a dangerous job. I wouldn’t argue that point for a
       minute. But she has police flanking her at all times. She knows
       all of them personally and works closely with them.
       --As, of course, she would need to, given the system she is
       working for. The mental health system, at least in the US,  is
       organized around a flagrant violation of human rights, after
       all, even though most people prefer not to think about this
       fact.
       There are several ways in which a person can be locked up for
       mental illness, and none of them is truly voluntary--unless that
       person has money (quite a bit of it) and can sign himself up in
       a private mental hospital of his choice, in which case he is
       free to sign himself out as well. The rest of the US citizenry
       finds that “voluntary” hospitalization is really an illusion.
       Someone who has been reported as being a danger to himself or
       others is offered two choices: go voluntarily with the officers
       who will transport him to a locked mental ward, or else the
       officers will take that person by force.
       As anyone who has ever observed any part of this process knows,
       “force” means just that. There are several police, fit as
       fiddles and of course armed. If the person puts up too much
       resistance, more force is applied. “Restraints” are used. A hypo
       is given—an injection speedily and efficiently administered so
       that the person quiets down fast. Later he will become aware
       that he is in a place with bars on the windows, from which there
       may be no escape.
       “Voluntary”? And yet in her Glossary for this book, Holland
       provides the shorthand used at Bellevue: “913” for a voluntary
       admission, “939” for an involuntary one, and then there is the
       “940” category, for a 72-hour hold, for an admission to the
       Extended Observation Unit or EOU.
       All through this book I felt that there was an elephant in the
       room, and Holland never saw it. The system she was serving is a
       brutal way of locking up people society finds inconvenient or
       threatening, getting them out of the way, and usually doing so
       very  expeditiously. A psychiatrist can diagnose psychoses like
       paranoid schizophrenia after interviewing a patient for only a
       few minutes. Who looks at how long that diagnosis written on a
       form took? Who looks at how that diagnosis was made? Nobody.
       Julie Holland goes jauntily along, rather evidently enjoying her
       immense power. She can decide whether a patient will be sent to
       a different facility, sent back to prison, released, medicated.
       Many people’s lives have been altered irreversibly by people
       like Julie Holland, MD.
       While she’s at it, she emphasizes her own desirability. She
       gleefully details her several sexual encounters in the call room
       with male doctors. The boy friend who must have become her
       husband at some point in these nine years isn’t mentioned in
       this connection.  Later she gets a new boss, Maxwell, who kisses
       her effusively and unexpectedly on the lips at a party—sickening
       her. And so on.
       This book is appallingly bad. Not just because it reveals the
       author to be alarmingly unprofessional (and apparently almost
       proud of the fact) but because she indulges in trendy language,
       as in “My tough-guy confrontational thing is so over,” and the
       account is sloppily written.
       And yet towards the end Holland is exuding compassion for the
       homeless on the street: “They’re my people”—as she prepares to
       leave Bellevue forever, and she smugly concludes that “Not
       everyone is built for Bellevue like I was.”
       Her specialty seems to be psychopharmacology and she clearly has
       great faith in the efficacy of drugs in overcoming mental
       disorders. She is presumably whipping off prescriptions in her
       private practice even now. One can only be glad that she is no
       longer at Bellevue, but there is the unfortunate probability
       that other psychiatrists, like her or far worse, have come along
       to replace her.
       *****************************************************