(DIR) Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
(DIR) Return to: True Left vs Right
*****************************************************
#Post#: 395--------------------------------------------------
Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 19, 2020, 4:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
(Old content will be reposted at a later date.)
Our enemy Duchesne has compiled all his Homo Hubris tweets into
a single article:
(HTM) https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2020/07/white-men-responsible-for-almost-all-greatest-achievements.html
[quote]The biggest reason why Whites are believed to be racist
is that they are far the greatest achievers in human history and
they created the nations non-whites crave to inhabit. The very
existence of White Men goes against the principle of equality
since they are responsible for almost 100% of the greatest
achievements in all the fields of human endeavor since ancient
historical times. This is a big reason why White nations are
earmarked for total race mixing, and why White Males are the
most resented group.
The following lists come directly from tweets I wrote over the
last few months. These tweets are based on careful documentation
and extensive research. One of the reasons I was suspended from
twitter is that hundreds of complaints were regularly sent
against me for speaking about the unique greatness of White men.
These lists (and some exaggerate a bit, for the sake of
argument) will show that White men are responsible for almost
everything that is noble, beautiful, and excellent in history,
far surpassing the achievements of all the other races combined.
The sheer fact that White men came up with all the disciplinary
fields taught in our universities speaks volumes: archaeology,
botany, economics, sociology, anthropology, history, biology,
chemistry, genetics, physics, medicine, literature, theology,
architecture...all of them.
The greatest painters, novelists, historians, biologists,
physicists, classical composers, poets, car designers,
mathematicians, architects are White men. White men were the
greatest nation builders in history. They discovered and mapped
the entire earth, every river, mountain, sea, desert --
including every territory inhabited by non-whites.[/quote]
"Greatest" according to Western standards only. Reject Western
standards and suddenly everything Duchesne boasts about becomes
indictment against Western civilization. One thing we can be
sure about is that if the "white" men praised by Duchesne had
been magically erased from existence before the Renaissance, the
world could have been spared not only the entirety of the
violence of the colonial era but also almost all of the
macro-scale problems we currently face:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
(not to mention the ugliest aesthetics the world has ever seen:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/<br
/>)
So no, we do not see equality either. We see obvious Western
inferiority. Nothing invented by Western civilization was
invented with the prior consent of the rest of the world which
is nevertheless forced to live with its consequences ever after
whether we like it or not (and try to alleviate the suffering
and clean up the mess they have caused as best we can). Yet
Western civilization did not care in the slightest about this
permanent violence any more than it cared about all the other
violence it did over the last 500 years. This is part of what
makes Western civilization uniquely inferior.
#Post#: 4110--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 11, 2021, 12:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Right on schedule, our enemies rush to praise Brady:
(HTM) https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2021/02/the-greatest-of-all-time.html
[quote]On Sunday night, I found myself at a local Super Bowl
party. I went for the food, drinks, and camaraderie. I barely
watched the television, usually getting sidelined into a
conversation about the election, work, kids, etc. Still, I
wanted Tom Brady to win. At one point, a Kansas City Chiefs fan
complained loudly that the refs were “giving Brady the trophy”
after a penalty call went in his favor. I watched the replay. It
was a good call (defensive holding). As a few others and I
defended the call, the KC fan – a White guy in a Mahomes jersey
– sneered, “It’s because Brady is White.” Since it was neither
my friend nor my party, I disengaged and went back to chatting
about whatever over scotch.
But I agree – Tom Brady was getting the calls from the referees
because he is White, but not for the same reasons the KC cuck
lamented.
...
Pocket passers are field generals in every way. They are
directing the team. They are watching the refs, defenders,
players, coaches, and fans. The amount of cerebral capacity it
takes to process so much stimuli in so short a period of time is
astounding. They are applying the hours they studied of film and
game plans to matters occurring in real time, within seconds. It
also takes extraordinary restraint. You must process, analyze,
interpret, and execute in seconds while trusting that the men
coming to crush you will be stopped by the five men in front of
you. In short, the ideal pocket passing quarterback is
intelligent, studious, disciplined, and athletic.
In other words, the ideal pocket passing quarterback is White.
...
Thus, going back to the reason that Tom Brady has emerged as the
Greatest of All Time – with seven super bowl rings, ten super
bowl appearances, and a smoking hot wife – has everything to do
with his race. The KC cuck was not wrong. The refs were giving
preferential calls to Brady because he is White. But they were
not doing so out of some silly systemic racism myth. They were
doing so because Tom Brady, the White pocket passing
quarterback, enjoys the intelligence, capacity, discipline, and
athleticism to make them give him those calls. Tom Brady is
capable of thinking and acting at the same time.
Consequently, Tom Brady’s career is the epitome of White
Privilege – as in, he is privileged to be White.
Congratulations Tom![/quote]
In the old days, I used to counter rightist assertions that
"white privilege does not exist" simply by asking the asserters
whether they would not mind themselves magically being
transformed into "non-white" if they could keep all their
individual talents. Not one of them was ever willing to say they
would not mind this, thereby undermining their own assertion. I
guess this line of attack had an impact, as they now simply
admit it.
Lastly, "smoking hot wife"?
(HTM) https://media.bleacherreport.com/f_auto,w_800,h_533,q_auto,c_fill/br-img-images/003/845/741/hi-res-28857642bf129b249bf47b7828a167ee_crop_north.jpg
How long before our enemies realize the joke is on them every
time they make such statements? Because all we need to do in
response is post a picture!
#Post#: 4137--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: rp Date: February 11, 2021, 10:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Tom Brady bailed out by refs: Super Bowl 55 rigged?:
(HTM) https://youtu.be/8nLraMI5Au8
#Post#: 4224--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 14, 2021, 11:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Every time I read an enemy article like this one, I better
appreciate just how apt the name "Homo Hubris" is to describe
them:
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/02/14/a-few-great-often-forgotten-white-moments/
[quote]My goal is to entertain as well as enlighten the reader
with a few not-as-well known, or so-well-known but
taken-for-granted inventions, happenings, and ideas, and a
modicum of names of White people who deserve to be listed in the
pantheon of The Great Whites. Let us begin.
...
Arthur Scherbius
...
In 1918, he founded the firm of Scherbius & Ritter. He made a
number of inventions, for example, asynchronous motors, electric
pillows and ceramic heating parts; his research contributions
led to his name being associated with the Scherbius principle
for asynchrous motors. He applied for a patent in February 1918
for a cipher machine based on rotating wired wheels, what is now
known as a rotor machine.
...
Scherbius’ Enigma provided the German Army with the strongest
cryptographic cipher in the world at the time, until the code
was broken by Polish mathematicians in the 1930s, as discussed
in the following section.
Marian Rejewski, Henryk Zygalski and Jerzy Rozycki
...
Rejewski together with Henryk Zygalski and Jerzy Rozycki managed
to build an Enigma double. They developed numerous techniques
for defeating the plugboard and get all the components of the
keys, thus making it possible for them to read all the German
enciphered messages from 1933 to 1939.
...
Since the Germans were convinced that their technology could not
be deciphered, they continued using the machine for different
types of communications with their secret services, in the sky,
and on the battlefield. The decoded messages were given to a few
commanders who used it cautiously making sure that the Germans
did not find out that their cipher was broken.
[/quote]
To a non-Homo Hubris mind, the conclusion is that it would have
been better for the cipher machine not to have been invented in
the first place. But Homo Hubris, in contrast, celebrates both
the invention and the counter-invention.
[quote]Claude Shannon
...
In a 1939 letter to his mentor at Bell Laboratories, Vannevar
Bush, Shannon outlined some of his initial ideas on “fundamental
properties of general systems for the transmission of
intelligence.”
...
Shannon’s theories have now become the standard framework
underlying all modern-day communication systems: optical,
underwater, even interplanetary.
His theories laid the groundwork for the electronic
communications networks that now lace the earth.
...
His later work on chess-playing machines and an electronic mouse
that could run a maze helped create the field of artificial
intelligence[/quote]
I know:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
[quote]Oscar H. Banker
...
Oscar H. Banker (b. Asatour Sarafian, May 31, 1895) was an
Armenian-American inventor who patented a number of works,
including an automatic transmission and power steering for
automobiles. He is considered the “father of the automatic
transmission.”[/quote]
Which significantly increased use of cars.....
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
[quote]The Columbian Exposition of 1893
The World’s Columbian Exposition celebrated the 400th
anniversary of Christopher Columbus’s discovery of America. (Or
as Wikipedia says, Columbus’s arrival in the new world.)
...
Fredrick Law Olmsted, possibly the world’s foremost landscape
architect, laid out the plan to build on a swamp requiring wood
pilings driven into the ground to support the buildings. He also
created a system of lagoons and lakes in which full size
replicas of Columbus’ ships, the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa
Maria floated. 40,000 skilled and unskilled laborers (making ten
cents a day) constructed the fair’s buildings.
There were over 65,000 exhibits at the fair covering 630 acres.
The Chicago skyline was dominated by a 250-foot-high Ferris
wheel, designed for the fair by inventor George Ferris. It was
100 feet taller than today’s Ferris wheel at Chicago’s Navy Pier
and had 36 cars capable of holding 60 people each. Fully loaded,
it could carry 2,160 people and took a full twenty minutes to
make one rotation.
...
The main entryway was a peristyle of forty-eight massive fluted
columns on either side of an arch in the style of the Arc de
Triompe.
Every US state built an exhibition house or building to show its
products. California had, among other things, a full-size
medieval knight on a horse made of prunes. Missouri showcased a
replica of the Statue of Liberty made of sugar. Philadelphia
sent the Liberty Bell to grace Pennsylvania’s building.
This was the first Fair to solicit exhibits from foreign
countries and forty-six heeded the call. It seemed that each
nation was in a fierce competition to excel the others. France
built a nearly full-size wing of the Palace of Versailles.
On October 9, 1893, nearly a million people paid 50 cents to
attend the opening where President Grover Cleveland pushed a
solid gold button to switch on George Westinghouse’s electric
lights that illuminated in a bath of brilliant whiteness the
staff-laden buildings of the Fair. Nearly half of the total
population of the US attended the Fair.
It is impossible to describe the awesome accomplishment of the
White men and women who came together to create one of the
wonders of the modern world. Everything about it was the
biggest, the best, the greatest. It had the longest telescope in
the world, the largest building in the world, and a choir of
2,500 singers.
...
Like George Ferris who was not content to allow the erector-set
appearing Eifel Tower to stand as the crowning glory of
civilization, there were others who motivated by money, fame, or
ego, would scale mountains of obstacles, and leave their
indelible record in the history books and in their genes for
future generations.
You might also feel a bit wistful if not melancholy as you
contemplate that White people descended to the deepest part of
the oceans, climbed the highest land masses, and flew to the
moon to go for a walk.
Can we ever attain the impossible tasks again? Or have we lost
that intangible component, that antecedent of accomplishment,
that precursor of victory, and that faculty of deliberative
striving?[/quote]
My worry is that they haven't lost it. And I don't recommend
taking the risk to find out. The above paragraphs describe very
well what Western civilization is all about. Hasn't the world
had far more than enough of their **** already?
WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
#Post#: 4324--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 18, 2021, 11:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies can never write enough of these articles; do they
realize that each such article further lowers our opinion of
them?
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/02/18/the-pale-male-paradox-how-white-men-achieve-most-and-are-vilified-worst/
[quote]It’s one of the most interesting, enlightening and
eye-opening books I’ve ever read: Simon Winchester’s Exactly:
How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World (2018).
Winchester tells a story of astonishing ingenuity, intelligence
and effort from the steam-engine (44) to the “extreme
ultraviolet” laser (296). And it’s almost exclusively a story of
stale pale males—of White men from northwestern Europe.
...
slavery was neither necessary nor sufficient for the rise of
Britain as an industrial and technological giant. Black slaves
effectively played the role of horses and oxen: their muscles
powered mechanisms and economic systems created by White
ingenuity and foresight, but Blacks had no intellectual or
creative role in what they powered.
...
White men have achieved most in all manner of fields, from
engineering and mathematics to exploration and mountaineering.
But they are also the most vilified group on earth and are held
responsible for all manner of evils, from slavery and pollution
to systemic racism and police brutality. Why does the
highest-achieving group also receive the greatest
opprobrium?[/quote]
Because we never gave consent for you to modernize the world
that all of us live in! But in typical Western disregard for
seeking prior consent you did it anyway, thereby forcing the
rest of us to live in this modern world that you created whether
we like it or not.
[quote]I hadn’t heard of Maudslay and his “formidable skill in
delicate engineering” (p. 54) before I read Exactly. Unlike
George Floyd, Maudslay exerted himself to defeat crime, not to
commit it. He helped perfect the effectively unbeatable locks of
his mentor Joseph Bramah (1748–1814). He then went on, in Simon
Winchester’s words, “to become the founding father of precision
toolmaking, mass production, and the key engineering concept of
perfect flatness.” (p. 62) Among much else, he invented a lathe
that could “efficiently, precisely and [quickly]” make something
that contributed far more to Britain’s wealth than “centuries of
African enslavement.”
What was the something? It was “that most essential component of
the industrialized world, the screw.” (p. 63) Henry Maudslay,
unlike George Floyd, helped hold the Western civilization
together — and literally so. In a sane world, his story would
embolden Whites to say “Screw you!” to inane and self-righteous
anti-White groups like Black Lives Matter.[/quote]
We have been building everything we needed in daily life for
thousands of years without ever requiring screws. So in the eyes
of all of us who oppose industrialization (which is an ongoing
macro-scale crime against the entire planet that daily dwarfs
anything Floyd could possibly have done), it follows that the
screw is to blame, and hence its inventor is to blame. So no,
screw Maudslay!
[quote]Nor did we hear about a Swedish engineer who contributed
immensely to perhaps the most important part of precision:
measurement. But Winchester points out that the Swedish engineer
has been unjustly forgotten for a long time: “Carl Edvard
Johansson died in 1943, respected and beloved in Sweden, and
forgotten elsewhere.” Johansson (1864–1943) invented measuring
instruments known as gauge blocks or Jo blocks, which come in
varying sizes and can be fitted together to measure, for
example, “any of the 1000 lengths from 3.000 to 3.999 mm in
0.001 mm steps.” Winchester writes that Jo blocks are “machined
with such precision that there [are] no asperities whatsoever on
their surfaces that might allow air to get between and form a
point of weakness. They [are] so perfectly flat that the
molecules of their faces [bond] with one another when they [are]
joined [and it becomes] impossible to break them apart. … They
can only be slid apart.” (p. 3)
Winchester adds that scientists still don’t fully understand the
physical mechanism behind the bonding of Jo blocks. In a sense,
White ingenuity is still defeating White ingenuity: Johansson’s
measuring blocks created a mystery. [/quote]
Whatever turns you on.
Seriously, again we had been doing fine for thousands of years
without needing this type of measuring. so why do you expect us
to be impressed with gauge blocks? They are nothing but another
accomplice in industrialization, the negative consequences of
which are manifold and inescapable:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
Continuing:
[quote]they direct themselves outwards, creating ingenious and
awesome machines, scaling the earth’s heights, plumbing the
ocean’s depths, and landing in person or by proxy on the Moon,
Mars and Venus.
...
So is it ironic that Kehinde Andrews and countless other
anti-White ideologues go through life relying absolutely on
White male invention and ingenuity without acknowledging the
debt they owe, let alone expressing any gratitude?[/quote]
We are forced to use your machines in reaction to you using the
same machines, to prevent you gaining too great an advantage
over us. This does not mean we enjoy using your machines. We
would prefer they were never invented. So why should we feel
indebted to you, let alone grateful?
[quote]No, I don’t think it is. I think it’s entirely
predictable. One could hardly expect Kehinde Andrews to admit
that merely one tiny White group like the Swedes have
contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who
ever lived.
Indeed, the single Swedish male Carl Edvard Johansson
contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who
ever lived.[/quote]
Yes, and that is what makes Swedish engineers, not least
Johansson, accomplices to industrialization and hence villains
of world history.
By the way, Kehinde Andrews is the same person whom I recently
posted about here:
(HTM) http://aryanism.net/blog/other/when-history-is-written-by-leftists/
Continuing:
[quote]The culture of critique is already proclaiming that Black
women “played a crucial part” in the Moon Landings and the
creation of GPS, the global positioning system whose genuine
White male creators are described in Winchester’s book.
Proud Black wimminz in, hate-filled honkies out
As Black women are written into the history of STEM (Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), White men will be
written out. Our hostile elite aren’t really following the
script of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), but they might
as well be: “In his own schooldays, Winston remembered, in the
late fifties, it was only the helicopter that the Party claimed
to have invented; a dozen years later, when Julia was at school,
it was already claiming the aeroplane; one generation more, and
it would be claiming the steam engine.”
The steam engine, the aeroplane and the helicopter are all
products of White male genius. The parasitic Party had already
claimed two of them for its own in Orwell’s novel. In our
reality, the parasitic culture of critique is beginning to
assign the products of White male genius to Black women.[/quote]
This is a False Left manouevre which as a True Leftist I have
denounced over and over again. Any "non-whites" who wish they
had invented any modern machines are in spirit no better than
the machines' actual inventors, as they are in effect wishing
they had contributed to industrialization. They too are
Westerners, and hence our enemies. Nevertheless, this problem
too could have been avoided if only the machines in question
were themselves never invented in the first place! Most
fundamentally to blame are still the actual inventors.
#Post#: 4899--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 17, 2021, 11:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As I keep saying, the fastest way to understand someone's value
system is to look at which words they use to insult those whom
they dislike. The following should leave us in no doubt that
Homo Hubris is the perfect name for our enemies:
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/03/17/mediocre-meghan-as-microcosm-how-meghan-markle-symbolizes-black-hatred-of-white-civilization/
[quote]Meghan Markle was a mediocre actress of mediocre
intellect with mediocre looks. She snagged a surplus prince and
won herself a spectacular wedding, hijacking great White
architecture and ritual with Black narcissism, crudity and
entitlement.[/quote]
Reminder: one day we must cover Buckingham Palace in the
'Western civilization is UGLY' topic.
Oh, what the heck, here is a quick link for now (a Westerner
wrote the page title, obviously):
(HTM) https://www.askideas.com/31-very-beautiful-inside-pictures-of-the-buckingham-palace-london/
[quote]You could also hear mediocre Black narcissists around the
world rushing to their keyboards to type passionate defences of
Markle.
...
Mos-Shogbamimu went on to explain that “As a Black woman, I am
so used to all the nuances of racism that vary from person to
person. There is obvious racism, but there is also a more subtle
form of racism, which can best be described as a form of white
violence.” When racism becomes “more subtle,” it presumably
doesn’t involve physical attacks. So how can “more subtle”
racism be “best described” as “white violence”? Very easily, to
the mediocre intellect of Mos-Shogbamimu.[/quote]
That our enemies think only physical attacks count as violence
reveals their total lack of honour.
[quote]Like Oprah Winfrey and Meghan Markle, Mos-Shogbamimu is a
mediocre Black facing the grandeur and tradition of a great
White institution.
...
the Monarchy remains a potent symbol of White Christian Britain
and is still hated by those who want to destroy Britain and its
traditions. Those who can’t create often wish to forget their
inferiority by destroying what others have created.[/quote]
No, we want to destroy what you have created because what you
have created is inferior.
[quote]The mediocre Black historian David Olusoga has done
exactly that.
...
And so, after Meghan Markle attacked the Royal Family, Olusoga
joined the hysteria in (where else?) the Guardian and announced
that the interview with Oprah Winfrey “is not just a crisis for
the royal family — but for Britain itself.” Yes, that’s how
serious it is when a mediocre Black actress claims that an
unspecified royal had enquired, in unspecified terms and an
unspecified context, about the possible future skin-colour of
her semi-Black embryo.
...
Black mediocrities side with Black barbarism rather than White
civilization.
...
Oprah and Obama, united in mediocrity
...
his fellow mediocre Black, the Guardian journalist Afua Hirsch,
extolled his “candour and courage.”
How is it that mediocre Blacks like Markle, Olusoga, Hirsch and
Mos-Shogbamimu wield such power and influence in modern Western
societies? How did a mediocre Black like Oprah Winfrey become a
billionaire and a mediocre Black like Barack Obama become
President of the United States?
...
That’s why Morgan still has a place in the mainstream media.
He’s pro-Jewish, even if he’s prepared to criticize a
self-proclaimed Black victim like Meghan Markle. But he didn’t
discuss Black narcissism, mediocrity and hatred of White
civilization, which are still taboo subjects in the mainstream.
...
Oprah Winfrey and Meghan Markle may be mediocre in intellect,
but they and countless other non-Whites have proved quite
capable of learning and applying the central message of the
culture of critique: White racism explains all White success and
all non-White failure.
...
It’s a simple message for simple minds and it will destroy the
West unless it is firmly and irreversibly defeated by the truth.
Whites are not the world’s greatest villains, but the world’s
greatest creators. And they have a right to live in their own
nations free of envious and hate-filled Black mediocrities like
Meghan Markle and David Olusoga.[/quote]
No, you are the world's greatest villains BECAUSE you are the
world's greatest creators:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
It is precisely the Western fear of mediocrity that has
motivated Western civilization's transformation of the world
(done without the consent of everyone else, in other words
violently) into the monstrosity of complexity that it has
become. And you think you are insulting us by calling us
mediocre? You are only confirming to us that you are Westerners.
#Post#: 4903--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: rp Date: March 17, 2021, 11:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Reminder: one day we must cover Buckingham Palace in the
'Western civilization is UGLY' topic."
I already have:
[quote author=rp link=topic=48.msg4787#msg4787 date=1615656120]
Next stop: Buckingham "Palace" (360 degree tour courtesy of
BBC):
(HTM) https://youtu.be/FtGN2wK9g_s
[/quote]
#Post#: 5052--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 24, 2021, 12:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
Recently you may have heard of this incident:
www.thedailybeast.com/columbia-student-from-viral-video-speaks-i
-am-not-racist
A columbia university student just went on a drunken racist
tirade shouting how whites built modern civilization. Of course,
WN groups are claiming that this is not racist because he is
merely "stating the facts". Any thoughts?
---
[quote]According to von Abele, his videotaped tirade was simply
a plea for all races and cultures to openly appreciate their
people’s accomplishments. “I believe that every single person
should love themselves and love their culture, and we should all
be allowed to be proud of our heritage,” he said.[/quote]
There exist racist cultures. Therefore, if every single person
should love their culture, there will exist some people who love
racism.
There exist racist heritages. Therefore, if every single person
should be allowed to be proud of their heritage, there will
exist some people allowed to be proud of racism.
As for whether von Abele individually is racist, the answer can
be found by considering: is the particular culture/heritage
which he loves racist?
[quote]"Fuck yeah, white people. Fuck yeah, white men."[/quote]
If it were not, it would never even have come up with the notion
of "whiteness".
Therefore von Abele is racist. QED
[quote]"Look, I don’t hate other people, I just love white
men."[/quote]
I hate von Abele and all like him, and I would be ashamed of
myself if I did not.
[quote]"I was theatrically and sarcastically demonstrating that
whites are not allowed to embrace their cultural
achievements"[/quote]
Why should they be? Should Jews be allowed to embrace Jewish
cultural achievements? Should people who experiment on animals
be allowed to embrace their research achievements?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivisection#François_Magendie_(1783–1855)
[quote]Magendie was a physiologist at the Académie Royale de
Médecine in France, established in the first half of the 19th
century.[15] Magendie made several groundbreaking medical
discoveries, but was far more aggressive than some of his other
contemporaries with his use of animal experimentation. For
example, the discovery of the different functionalities of
dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots was achieved by both
Magendie, as well as a Scottish anatomist named Charles Bell.
Bell used an unconscious rabbit because of "the protracted
cruelty of the dissection", which caused him to miss that the
dorsal roots were also responsible for sensory information.
Magendie, on the other hand, used conscious, six-week-old
puppies for his own experiments.[15][16] While Magendie's
approach was more of an infringement on what we would today call
animal rights, both Bell and Magendie used the same
justification for vivisection: the cost of animal lives and
experimentation was well worth it for the benefit of
humanity.[16]
Many viewed Magendie's work as cruel and unnecessarily
torturous. One note is that Magendie carried out many of his
experiments before the advent of anesthesia, but even after
ether's discovery it was not used in any of his experiments or
classes.[15] Even during the period before anesthesia, other
physiologists expressed their disgust with how he conducted his
work. One such visiting American physiologist describes the
animals as "victims" and the apparent sadism that Magendie
displayed when teaching his classes.[/quote]
Speaking of which, who introduced experimentation on animals as
a method of research in the first place?
[quote]"Fuck yeah, white people. Fuck yeah, white men."[/quote]
Correct:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_animal_testing
[quote]The history of animal testing goes back to the writings
of the Ancient Greeks in the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, with
Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304–258 BCE) one of
the first documented to perform experiments on animals.[1]
...
In his unfinished 1627 utopian novel, New Atlantis, scientist
and philosopher Francis Bacon proposed a research center
containing "parks and enclosures of all sorts of beasts and
birds which we use ... for dissections and trials; that thereby
we may take light what may be wrought upon the body of man."
...
the dramatic "Experiment 41," which demonstrated the reliance of
living creatures on the air for their survival. Boyle conducted
numerous trials during which he placed a large variety of
different animals, including birds, mice, eels, snails and
flies, in the vessel of the pump and studied their reactions as
the air was removed.[5] Here, he describes an injured lark:
…the Bird for a while appear'd lively enough; but upon a greater
Exsuction of the Air, she began manifestly to droop and appear
sick, and very soon after was taken with as violent and
irregular Convulsions, as are wont to be observ'd in Poultry,
when their heads are wrung off: For the Bird threw her self over
and over two or three times, and dyed with her Breast upward,
her Head downwards, and her Neck awry.[6][/quote]
(I strongly encourage reading the whole page.)
The Western idea of utopia implies unlimited experimentation on
non-humans.
[quote]“We invented science and industry and you want to tell us
to stop because, ‘Oh my God, we’re so bad!’”[/quote]
Yes, you did. Yes, I do. Yes, you are.
[quote]"Fuck yeah, white people. Fuck yeah, white men."[/quote]
WE WILL REPLACE YOU.
---
Another one:
metro.co.uk/2019/01/12/racist-says-white-men-created-civilisatio
n-brixton-mcdonalds-8337918/
[quote]A man told customers that ‘white men created
civilisation’ and ‘England is f***ed because it’s run by women
and immigrants’ during a racist rant at McDonald’s.
The middle-aged man can be heard in the clip telling staff at
the fast food chain on Brixton Road in London: ‘This place is
run by bloody immigrants’.
After noticing a man filming his monologue, he tells the crowd
waiting for their orders: ‘You feminist, weak, hairy-faced,
“mangina”, soy boys… cut your balls off… you’re letting women
run the world, shame upon you all.
...
The unnamed man refers to Mr Parvenu, who calls himself a ‘black
bohemian’ on Twitter, as ‘bruv’ in the video and tells him: ‘The
world is built by white men. You don’t like it, do you?’. The
man goes on: ‘The entire civilisation was created by white men,
white men created the world for you people.’[/quote]
It's disturbing to think how WN never really took off in
popularity until it incorporated misogyny into its ideology. And
there used to be some desperate thinkers who thought promoting
misogyny could end racism by leading to unification among men. I
warned them that promoting misogyny would just make racism many
times worse than it already was. They went ahead and did it
anyway. Guess who was correct.....
The above is your creation, imbeciles, and now you have lost
control over what you created.
---
It seems like every other day I read about random people being
outed as closet WNs.
atlantablackstar.com/2018/07/28/bronx-doctor-gets-found-out-as-c
loset-white-nationalist-claims-hes-now-seeking-professional-help
/
Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!
---
"Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!"
No surprises, as usual.
[quote]a resident radiologist at Montefiore Medical Center’s
Moses Campus in the Bronx.[/quote]
A radiologist. Think about that for a moment. How many
"non-whites" might he have given cancer to over the years by
deliberately scanning them slightly longer?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CT_scan#Adverse_effects
[quote]“The West has no use for [Muslims], and they’ll be just
fine when they go home,” he wrote.[/quote]
Let us thank him for demonstrating Western thinking: only people
with exploitative value to the West have reason be allowed to
live in Western countries. And even then, Western countries are
not their home, even if they are born there.
[quote]“If we take the birth of a non-white in isolation from
context, that birth isn’t inherently a tragedy to the white race
… [my] point is the principle that the loss of a white child is
far worse than the birth of a non-white, at least in theory,”
Bechhofer wrote in another.[/quote]
This is accurate analysis. If the "non-white" birth rate had
been lower 600 years ago, world history would not have been too
different. If the "white" birth rate had been lower 600 years
ago, the colonial era might never have happened. Of course, what
is worse in Bechhofer's eyes is better in our eyes.
[quote]In another post attributed to “Dov,” the doctor wrote, ”
… Do I despise Blacks like [Colin] Kaepernick for milking the
White cow despite the fact that he, his race, and all others are
already in such objective debt to Whites? Absolutely.”[/quote]
There is nothing objective about it. Only rightist "non-whites"
feel indebted to "whites". Leftist "non-whites" do not.
Kaepernick clearly belongs in the latter category:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/sports-as-a-platform-for-protest/
---
Tucker Carlson’s racist remarks:
www.motherjones.com/media/2019/03/tucker-carlson-calls-iraqis-se
militerate-primitive-monkeys-in-latest-round-of-tapes/
(HTM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TjXAwAAjTY
This commenter gets it:
[quote]Yes white people are responsible for the industrial
revolution and the impending collapse of the biosphere as a
result of the industrial revolution.[/quote]
---
We should invite people like that over here.
---
“semiliterate primitive monkey.”
To be clear, if you are offended by being called a monkey, you
have already been Westernized. The truth (which is so obvious
that it shouldn't even need to be stated) is that monkeys have
done almost infinitely less evil in the world than humans.
“culture where people just don’t use toilet paper or forks.”
web.archive.org/web/20120219201640/
(HTM) http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/thegreenguide/2010/04/27000-trees-a-day-used-for-toilet-tissue.html
“extremely primitive.”
Biologically, women are on average more neotenous than men. If
Carlson is using "primitive" to mean underdeveloped, he would be
correct. But if "primitive" means less evolved, then it would be
men (who failed to become as neotenous as women on average) who
are more "primitive". One thing is for sure:
www.essence.com/news/politics/if-only-women-voted/
Which is, of course, not to say that men in general are the
problem:
brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/
See also:
(HTM) https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/demographic-blueshift/
#Post#: 5053--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 24, 2021, 12:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
Research confirms what I intuitively predicted a decade ago
about how backlash politics works:
www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/world/asia/sri-lanka-populism-ethnic-
tensions.html
[quote]‘Overrun,’ ‘Outbred,’ ‘Replaced’: Why Ethnic Majorities
Lash Out Over False Fears
...
That dynamic, sometimes known as a majority with a minority
complex, is thought to be a major factor in the rise of
right-wing populism in Europe, religious nationalism in Asia,
and white nationalist terrorism in the United States and New
Zealand.
...
These dynamics are rising globally, and not only when one group
is a majority nationally and a minority regionally.
Asked in 2013 about Buddhist violence against Myanmar’s Rohingya
Muslim minority that would later culminate in genocide, Aung San
Suu Kyi, the country’s de facto leader, responded by warning
darkly of “global Muslim power.”
...
And the rise of democracy, long considered a force for ethnic
harmony, may be provoking majority backlashes instead, according
to research by Jack Snyder, a Columbia University political
scientist.
As democracy became the global norm, dominant ethnic groups
found themselves under growing pressure to share power with
minorities. They even lost the occasional election.
Anxiety around losing status can manifest as fears, however
unfounded, of becoming outnumbered. In countries with weak
institutions, that can lead to violence, possibly contributing
to the stall in democracy’s once-rapid spread.
“We often see this phenomenon at moments of increasing
democratization and increasing enfranchisement,” said Kate
Cronin-Furman, a University College London political scientist,
citing “horrible violence against the Rohingya breaking out at a
time of increased democratization in Burma.”
...
Muslims, we hear at rallies for the Alternative for Germany and
France’s National Front, will soon outnumber non-Muslims in
Europe and impose Shariah law.
A leader of Vox, the Spanish far-right party that just won its
first Parliamentary seats, warned at a September rally of an
“Islamist invasion.” The party supports policies to increase
Spanish birthrates.
Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for
those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing,
any increase in the minority population is perceived as an
attack.
A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be
driving significant political change in the United States, which
is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less
than half of the population — by 2050.
A study by Maureen Craig of New York University and Jennifer
Richeson of Yale University found that white Americans who so
much as read a news article on these demographic changes will
express “more negative attitudes toward Latinos, blacks, and
Asian-Americans” and “more automatic pro-white/anti-minority
bias.”
The effect disappeared when the authors told participants that
whites were expected to remain politically and culturally
dominant.[/quote]
And yet many of them do not like to be called "white
supremacists" even though this is precisely what they are.
(By the way, "white American" is an oxymoron.)
[quote]Other studies find that when white Americans learn about
these demographic trends they become less supportive of
immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health
care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of
President Trump.
In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination
against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination
against blacks and other minorities.”
Fears of ‘Replacement’
Whites are subject to the same forces as any other demographic
group. Fears of being outnumbered can lead to violence.
A rising wave of white-nationalist terrorists repeatedly cite
“replacement theory,” in which Jews are said to be orchestrating
mass immigration in order to destroy the white race.
At the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville,
Virginia, white power activists chanted “Jews will not replace
us” during their torchlit march on the University of Virginia
campus.
Brenton Tarrant, who murdered 50 people in two Christchurch, New
Zealand, mosques, described immigration and low white birthrates
as “an assault on the European people that, if not combated,
will ultimately result in the complete racial and cultural
replacement of the European people.”[/quote]
Jews indeed will not replace you: they - the ones who
deliberately set up your backlash - obviously want it to succeed
in creating additional ethnostates in the near future (whereupon
Israel will acquire a much politically safer position by ceasing
to be the only ethnostate in the world).
We, who defy the Zionist agenda to make ethnostates the norm in
the 21st century, are the ones who will replace you.
www.wewillreplaceyou.com/
www.facebook.com/WeWillReplaceU/
www.instagram.com/wewillreplaceyou/
www.commondreams.org/organization/we-will-replace-you
newpol.org/we-will-replace-you/
www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Yes-we-will-
replace-you-11942497.php
whatwouldjackdo.org/2017/09/16/you-will-not-replace-us-ah-but-we
-can-and-will-replace-you/
www.teepublic.com/t-shirt/1848861-we-will-replace-you
---
This is very clear in the colonial context. People defended that
Middle Easterners were uncivilized barbarians, but at the same
time not only seemed to admire their way of life seemingly free
of Western formality, a more honest and noble way of life, but
also actively projected Western fantasies and obsessions on
them. That's how the Middle East (the "Orient," as they called
it) became a place of unrestrained debauchery and violence. It
became the imaginary place where the West could finally live out
and fulfil its deepest, most repressed fantasies. The sad thing
is that this had very real consequences for the real people
living in such places. But that's okay for the West, because at
the end of the day they're not really people.
---
www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/couples-kissing-photo-with-dead-lio
n-goes-viral/ar-AAEteJh
A photo of Western civilization:
[img]
(HTM) https://globalnews.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/lion-photo-e1563212513368.jpg?quality=85&strip=all[/img]
---
Feed them to the lions.
---
More Western thinking revealed:
www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/07/22/the-stars-at-stake-how-
the-fight-for-equality-could-mean-the-death-of-humanity/
[quote]We need to get off the planet and establish permanent,
self-sustaining bases elsewhere in the solar system and even the
galaxy.
...
The money spent pursuing the unachievable goal of equality
should have gone on the eminently achievable goal of permanent
bases in outer space. ... And we could have been there by now,
if we weren’t spending so much in the vain pursuit of equality.
Indeed, right now we’re spending huge sums to increase the drag
on progress and postpone the conquest of space.
...
While South African Blacks were killing albinos for their
magically potent body-parts, South African Whites were building
nuclear weapons.[/quote]
Our enemies are now literally declaring that "whites" are
superior because they build nukes..... You cannot make this shit
up.
Seriously, if you were given a choice between either a world
with no albino-killing or a world with no nukes, which would you
choose? Albino-killing is just ordinary homicide that we can
leave the police to deal with. In contrast, were the bombers of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki (or, for that matter, those who left
behind all the depleted uranium from manufacturing nukes) ever
arrested, put on trial and punished? And albino-killing can end
as soon as no one wants to kill albinos any more. In contrast,
nuclear disarmament cannot occur even when all nuclear-armed
states want to disarm, because no one is willing to be the first
to disarm. So which is worse?
And one more thing. "Black" South Africans are not proud of the
freaks among them who kill albinos. Yet "white" South Africans
are proud of the freaks among them who build nukes. Which group
is the real problem here?
[quote]I’ve never seen a feminist or an anti-racist write about
the threat of an asteroid strike or another kind of
mega-catastrophe. Why not?
...
Indeed, if it had been up to women and non-Whites, we wouldn’t
even know about those threats and the repeated catastrophes that
have visited the Earth. Modern science is a White male invention
and White men have been the most successful and active explorers
of our vast and ancient universe.
...
On their own, women and non-Whites would never have discovered
the “iridium anomaly” that helped explain the extinction of the
dinosaurs. But then women and non-Whites would never have
discovered iridium or dinosaurs either. We owe our knowledge of
that element and those animals to White men.
...
one species of mammal learnt about dinosaurs and the asteroid
that had wiped them out.
...
Or rather: one sex of one race of that mammalian species learnt
about those things. The species was Homo sapiens, the race was
Whites, and the sex was male.[/quote]
Why must we discover iridium or dinosaurs? Were earlier people
who had never heard of iridium somehow deficient compared to
later people? Does knowing about dinosaurs make one a better
person compared to not knowing about dinosaurs? And even if so,
then how much more that we currently don't know about must we
also discover before we are considered "good enough" (whatever
that means)?
[quote]the White race is travelling somewhere. We have a
destination. And I fear that, like Lee Pomeroy, we will never
get there, thanks to non-White dysfunction.[/quote]
No, Homo Hubris, you do not have a destination. No quantity of
discovery will ever satisfy you. You will simply move on to
discovering the next thing, on and on without end. It is only
those who realize the endlessness, and hence the fundamental
valuelessness, of accumulationism who can speak of having a
destination.
---
(HTM) https://www.newsweek.com/nixon-reagan-racism-african-united-nations-1971-1451869
[quote]"To see those… monkeys from those African countries—damn
them, they're still uncomfortable wearing shoes!"[/quote]
They are correct to be uncomfortable wearing shoes!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barefoot#Health_implications
[quote]Feet that have never worn shoes rarely exhibit problems
such as bunions, corns, and "fallen arches",[109][110] are not
prone to more than ordinary foot eversion on standing and
walking due to the associated weakness or stiffness of the
joints of the foot and weakness of the muscles controlling
them,[111] as well as having a much reduced incidence of
problems such as callouses.[112]
Walking barefoot results in a more natural gait. People who are
used to walking barefoot tend to land less forcefully,
eliminating the hard heel strike and generating much less
collision force in the foot and lower leg.[113] A 2006 study
found that shoes may increase stress on the knee and ankle, and
suggested that adults who walked barefoot may have a lower rate
of osteoarthritis,[114] although more study is required to
elucidate the factors that distribute loads in shod and barefoot
walking. A 2007 study examined 180 modern humans and compared
their feet with 2,000-year-old skeletons. They concluded that,
before the invention of shoes, humans overall had healthier
feet.[113] A 1991 study found that children who wore shoes were
three times more likely to have flat feet than those who did
not, and suggested that wearing shoes in early childhood can be
detrimental to the longitudinal arch of the foot.[109] Children
who habitually go barefoot were found to have stronger feet,
with better flexibility and mobility, fewer deformities like
flat feet or toes that curve inwards, and fewer
complaints.[115][/quote]
---
It gets worse:
www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-lord-mayor
-stripped-title-16669078
[quote]Liverpool Lord Mayor and patron of anti-racism charity
stripped of title after sharing racist video
...
the video made comparisons between a black person and a monkey.
Cllr Brennan is a patron of the Anthony Walker Foundation - the
charity set up to promote racial harmony in the memory of the
shocking racist murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in
Huyton.
Anthony was killed by Michael Barton on this exact day in 2005.
...
“This appalling video was circulated 14 years to the day since
the promising and talented Merseyside teenager Anthony Walker
was brutally murdered in a horrific racist attack.[/quote]
---
How Westerners pose for photos:
(HTM) https://www.newsweek.com/jimmy-johns-trends-after-old-photo-owner-elephant-he-killed-goes-viral-again-1455872
[img]
(HTM) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECqJOjBWkAAdSU7?format=jpg&name=small[/img]
[img]
(HTM) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECqJOjCW4AAtNqE?format=jpg&name=360x360[/img]
#Post#: 5054--------------------------------------------------
Re: Homo Hubris
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 24, 2021, 1:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
This one needs a smackdown:
www.amren.com/news/2019/08/the-woody-allen-fallacy/
[quote]Both whites and non-whites complain about each other, but
only one side is making sense. Observe:
Proximity to non-whites makes whites suffer. Therefore, whites
denigrate non-whites because they want less of them.
Proximity to whites makes non-whites prosper. Therefore,
non-whites denigrate whites because they want more of them.
Which perspective is more honest and reasonable?[/quote]
Why do bandits run away after raiding? Because proximity to the
victims makes the bandits suffer (by getting punished).
Why do victims of the raid chase after the bandits after being
raided? Because proximity to the bandits makes the victims
prosper (by recovering the stolen property and exterminating the
bandits).
Does the above make the bandits "more honest and reasonable"
than the victims?
Also this does not imply that we want more bandits. We would
rather no raid ever occurred in the first place. But that does
not mean that, given the reality that the raid did occur, we are
willing to let the bandits get away with it unpunished.
[quote]An honest and reasonable approach would be for non-whites
to praise whites for creating great civilizations, and also to
state explicitly that non-whites have it better among whites
than among their own kind.[/quote]
Would it make sense for the victims to praise the bandits for
creating great raids? Should the fact that the victims can
recover their stolen property only from the bandits and not from
other victims (duh!) be spun into an interpretation that victims
"have it better" among bandits than among other victims?
[quote]If they were honest, they would show more respect for
their generous white hosts and for the Truth.[/quote]
Do bandits deserve respect? Can bandits to claim to be
"generous" with property that they stole? (And is the
mysteriously capitalized "Truth" the same one used by Trump?)
[quote]But these people don’t show respect. They act like
invaders, and they never fail to give in to anti-white bigotry
in their politics. And when whites quite naturally resist this,
they redouble their efforts against the whites, the very people
who’ve been their benefactors all along – all because they want
more out of white people, not less.[/quote]
Is storming the bandit hideout to demand return of stolen
property "invasive"? Is it "anti-bandit bigotry" to demand the
bandits be punished?
I agree that it is natural for bandits to resist returning
stolen property and to resist being punished. It is also to the
victims' credit that they redouble their efforts to bring the
bandits to justice. And yes, the victims should want as much
justice as possible.
[quote]What is a white supremacist? In the eyes of non-whites, a
white supremacist is a white person who wants to get away from
non-whites: to effectively give them smaller portions, or none
at all.[/quote]
Yes. A bandit who belives that bandits owe their victims
nothing, and hence wants to get away from the pursuing victims
to prevent them from recovering their stolen property - in other
words that initiated violence is respectable but retaliatory
violence is not - can accurately be called a bandit
supremacist.]
[quote]This is why they demonize and promise to wage war against
the very people who’ve been their benefactors for decades. It
all boils down to the Woody Allen Fallacy: The very thing they
profess to hate is what they desperately want more of.[/quote]
We do not want more bandits to exist. What we want is to leave
no existing bandit unpunished.
[quote]Non-whites need to be called out for this. They also need
to understand that they have no right to complain about white
people, because white people don’t owe them a portion of
anything.[/quote]
Compare the two parts in bold.
[quote]Non-whites don’t come to America or Europe because they
are doing such a bang-up job running their own countries, after
all.[/quote]
I was unable to find where the author explains why "whites" came
to America. Or everywhere else around the world they ever
colonized, for that matter.
---
Our enemies again set themselves up for us to laugh at them:
www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/09/13/the-esthetic-prop-revis
ited/
[quote]In Wilmot Robertson’s watershed book The Dispossessed
Majority (1972), in the chapter titled “The Esthetic Prop,”[1]
he describes the Esthetic Prop, which he associates most closely
with the “Nordic physical ideal,” as a “genetic resource” and
“an enduring, deeply-ingrained esthetic preference on the part
of most Americans.”[2] It is also a source of White (i.e.,
European) racial feeling and allegiance and one of the few
remaining props supporting the White position:
It is the…Esthetic Prop which helps the American White Majority
to hold on to the trappings, but not the substance, of its
former power. Only in the sector of esthetics, through the
pervasiveness of the idealized Nordic [i.e., Northern European]
biological type and its continued acceptance as the national
template of physical charm and attractiveness, has the Majority
been able to mount a small but successful holding action in the
present racial melee.[3]
...
Robertson’s words point us toward a still active beacon of light
which has been given too little consideration. We should give
new heed to what his words clearly suggest: that the Esthetic
Prop is a latent source of power that could and should be
activated to help our cause.
...
Its proper appropriation, which we should use to full advantage,
would be to prop up the race to which it belongs, to help
inspire and motivate the upward trajectory of a White
resurgence, by helping us clearly see what this time we really
are fighting for.[/quote]
OK? And then here come their examples:
[quote]
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/finnish.jpg
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/swedes.jpg[/quote]
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/236x/79/18/bd/7918bd309f6324716188106c6445a5ea.jpg
But wait, they have celebrity examples too!
[quote]
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/klum.jpg
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/arden.jpg
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/leg.jpg
(HTM) https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/drumm.jpg[/quote]
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/236x/79/18/bd/7918bd309f6324716188106c6445a5ea.jpg
That profile view in the second picture is almost cartoonishly
subhuman.
It's not over yet:
[quote]There is certainly a great degree of personal preference
on this subject, especially in terms of particular ranking, but
there should be general agreement (outliers always excepted) as
to qualification. Some such safe examples I could cite would be
Audrey Hepburn in Roman Holiday (1953), Vivien Leigh in Caesar
and Cleopatra (1945), Elizabeth Allan in A Tale of Two Cities
(1935), Greta Garbo in Queen Christina (1933),[7] and Grace
Kelly in any of the films of her brief career.[/quote]
I'm even going to do the work for them. Hepburn in Roman
Holiday:
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f8/bd/06/f8bd067ac4088cd32aedeaba2488ed6e.jpg
Leigh in Caesar and Cleopatra:
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/5c/8d/de5c8d258235d8b9853d8bd39c3a05f6.png
Allan in A Tale of Two Cities is the cartoonishly subhuman
profile view covered above. Here is a front view:
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cc/35/41/cc3541e41cbc77d11f664679b73d16a0.jpg
Garbo in Queen Christina:
(HTM) https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/WCEAAOSwkBZamsEs/s-l400.jpg
Kelly:
(HTM) https://hips.hearstapps.com/harpersbazaar/assets/cm/15/04/1024x682/54c047af87f02_-_hbz-grace-kelly-1955-481383667-xl.jpg
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/236x/79/18/bd/7918bd309f6324716188106c6445a5ea.jpghttps://i.pinimg.com/236x/79/18/bd/7918bd309f6324716188106c6445a5ea.jpghttps://i.pinimg.com/236x/79/18/bd/7918bd309f6324716188106c6445a5ea.jpg
Remember: these are the best our enemies could find. In other
word, when they think of the ultimate in "white" beauty, this is
what is in their minds.
(HTM) https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/490354142812966912/hucrypyJ_400x400.jpeg
[quote]To counter the power of White beauty they have long
labored to deconstruct and relativize it, and even to debase and
debauch it[/quote]
No, all I have to do is repost the exact same pictures that you
yourself posted, and exhibit the same examples that you yourself
chose. And laugh about it.
[quote]Garbo was a personal favorite of Robertson. He had a
large picture book of her in his library which caught my eye.
When I pulled it off the shelf and started looking through it he
became quite animated and enthused about what she meant to his
generation (he was eighteen when Queen Christina was released)
for whom she personified the ultimate esthetic ideal.[/quote]
Fine, let's do another Garbo:
(HTM) https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/614-I8Xce4L._AC_SX466_.jpg
One thing I will say: her face goes perfectly with the Western
chair. (This is not a compliment, of course.)
And then from the comments:
[quote]the beauty of our women creates jealousy and provides
even more motivation to destroy our gene pool.[/quote]
[quote]The urge to decry, belittle and destroy beauty, be it
white women, or the incomparable best of white civilisation and
art, is of course founded upon the Nietzschean concept of
ressentiment, or more simply sour grapes.[/quote]
And this is why we aptly call them Homo Hubris. Hubris is not
just when they have a ridiculously high opinion of themselves,
but when they are convinced that everyone else does as well, and
interpret all criticism as motivated by jealousy. Meanwhile back
in reality, we are honestly bewildered as to how it is even
possible to call the above examples "beauty". Or, more to the
point, how racially inferior our enemies must in order to indeed
perceive beauty in the above examples.
Homework: graphically visualize our enemies jacking off to the
above pictures.
---
Also from the comments:
[quote]I nominate Elizabeth Taylor, Penelope Cruz, and Sophia
Loren as famous exemplars of European beauty[/quote]
Taylor:
[img]
(HTM) https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/herald-review.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/32/932023bd-907a-5a62-84fc-7983ac57dbb0/5837c51835f15.image.jpg?resize=500%2C716[/img]
Cruz:
(HTM) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Penelope_Cruz_Cannes_2018.jpg/425px-Penelope_Cruz_Cannes_2018.jpg
Loren:
(HTM) https://i.pinimg.com/originals/15/36/19/153619e41e4c3b1d0f1e35cb66b1fc89.jpg
[img]
(HTM) https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Fz3meN5RGaHjdeU6HRSsQ_cus1X_tUGh1HLMBrh6R1eBn6W6M6dtQFCKVx5X6TN8kEifURsJhvlI615vl-PHZb57RT8LwxYEoM_UpxhKPbSAUnkZUGcLLFP3G7rMHvFbu6b6B25BPlLL-JGmz5erk9ix-9hbygT34EA[/img]
[quote]Monica Vitti wasn’t bad either[/quote]
Vitti:
(HTM) https://img.discogs.com/BqtoCWFdOH7LGWPhjjWV_vpbDiU=/596x720/smart/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/A-1827884-1274874518.jpeg.jpg
[quote]Sissy Spacek-type women work fine for me[/quote]
Spacek:
(HTM) https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2012/05/03/sissyspacek-credit-riker-brothers-587548af750abdd8a87a087ac2f66c50c7cb6414-s800-c85.jpg
This is turning into a Cro-Magnon skull yard sale! Does anyone
still think (in this case Giant) blood memory is not real?
*****************************************************
(DIR) Next Page