Subj : War or Planefuls of
To   : Gregory Deyss
From : Lee Lofaso
Date : Sat Jul 13 2019 06:08 pm

Hello Greg,

>   DS>  GD> There was no crime that was committed, therefore there can be no
>   DS>  GD> indictment not now or at the end of the Trump Administration
> which wi
>   DS>  GD> be in the year of 2024.
>   DS>
>   DS> That may be your opinion, biased though it may be.  But, it disagrees
>   DS> with over one thousand law professionals who say that all of the
>   DS> elements are there to indict and to probably achieve a criminal
>   DS> conviction.
>
>If Mueller did not indict, then there is no crime.

AG Elliot Richardson threatened to indict Vice President Vice President
Spiro Agnew on various charges, and was fully prepared to do so.
Rather than be indicted (and convicted), Spiro Agnew chose to resign
from office in disgrace.  Agnew later went on to plead guilty to all
charges and avoided going to jail.

After that event, President Nixon ordered his underlings in the DOJ
to come up with an excuse so he would not have to face the same fate
as his beloved vice president.  One lawyer in the DOJ came to his aid
by coming up with the excuse that in his own opinion the DOJ should not
have a policy allowing to indict a sitting president or vice president.
This was in spite of the fact there was no precedent.  As such, his
legal opinion carried no weight.  Absolutely none at all.

Did Spiro Agnew commit a crime(s)?  Yes, as he plead guilty.
Did Donald J. Trump commit a crime(s)?  Yes, even though he has
never plead guilty or not guilty.  Does it matter that neither
of them was indicted by the DOJ?  Not at all.

>The man said that if there were charges then he would of brought them forth
> to the fullest extent.

Once he is out of office, I doubt anybody will really care if
charges are brought forth or not.

>This is not an opinion, it is fact.

Either the president has, or has not, committed a crime(s).
So which is it?

>What these one thousand law professionals bring is an opinion.

Guilty as hell seems to me a condemnation.

>When examined why this is their opinion, you find them motivated and driven
> by their hateful and vile liberal agenda and their thirst for power.

Bill Weld (R-MA) is a liberal???

--Lee

-- 
Sleep With Someone New

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)

.