Subj : Re: SyncTERM users?
To   : Rob Swindell
From : Al DeRosa
Date : Fri Jan 11 2019 10:04 pm

On 12/15/18, Rob Swindell said the following...
 
 RS> Anyone here use SyncTERM for CBM/PETSCII emulation when connecting to
 RS> C64 or C128 boards?
 RS> 
 RS> If yes, I have a request of you: compare the SyncTERM v1.0 C64 or C128
 RS> "screen modes" with those in the current v1.1b (beta) and let us (the
 RS> SyncTERM dev-team) know *which* color representation best reflects what
 RS> you would expect to see in a CBM/PETSCII terminal.
 RS> 
 RS> Here are some screen shot comparisons (C64 screen mode) if you just want
 RS> to peek and comment quickly:
 RS> SyncTERM 1.0 screen shot:
 RS> https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl-cu1s0ogYogzkYg
 RS> SyncTERM 1.1b (current) screen shot:
 RS> https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApZPvWcrEaRQvJl9cli-mEJjXu9k4g
 RS> 

I just started using it recently (Been and still am a NetRunner user) I never
could get 1.0 to emulate it at least without the wrong fonts. I can use 1.1
though and although I am not used to the larger font it runs pretty well and
looks pretty clean. I use it to log into my Commodore BBS' so I can see what
is being transmitted and what I am receiving and they are pretty much the
exact same.. Not sure if this is what you were looking for..

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: The Wrong Number Family Of BBS' - Wrong Number ][ (1:267/157)

.