Subj : Routing files
To   : Paul Quinn
From : Steve Quarrella
Date : Sun Dec 09 2001 10:14 am

 PQ> Mmm... maybe I have been using Binkley-style outbound (BSO)
 PQ> for too long, already.  ;-)

You and Mike are both pushing me in the right direction, see previous.  THAT is 
what counts. :-)

 PQ> BTW, I gave up on FroDo at about the time when JoHo
 PQ> introduced the 2.2x version with static outbound (queues?).

Static Queue, right.  Being a long-time FD user, well, I poked the STQ with a 
point-ad stick for awhile, but it didn't bite me, and today, I use it just 
fine.  It basically saves you from having a lot of file-attach messages in your 
netmail folder.  As a mail mover and shaker, that cuts down on the rescan times 
I see.

 PQ> I just never investigated what that was all about.  So, if
 PQ> you're trying to shoehorn a FroDo static outbound with a BSO
 PQ> with Radius, I can't assist.

Not at all.  1:393/9005 is the FD system that has existed for about ten years 
now.  1:3830/9, run by the same guy, was built from the ground up, and uses 
Radius and Fastecho with BSO.  Forget 1:393/9005, as I referenced that only to 
display my history and knowledge with FD.  There's nothing about FD to be found 
on 1:3830/9, the system in question.

 PQ> Forget FroDo... utterly.  Dump it & go BSO only.  :)

Given that I'm one of the more vocal beta testers of FrontDoor, that's probably 
not going to happen. <heh>

 PQ> systems?  I don't wanna tell you how to suck the eggs, but
 PQ> you have told FE to use a 'Binkley/Xenia' mailer in FeSetup,
 PQ> now that you're toss/pack-ing mail to Radius' outbound?

Of course, and it works well.  Let me play with those forward key words again, 
and see what comes up.  I'll keep you guys advised, and thanks for your help.

---
 * Origin: Fnord (1:393/9005)

.