Subj : Routing files
To   : mark lewis
From : Barry Blackford
Date : Tue Jan 08 2002 08:41 am

Hello there mark!

06 Jan 02 at 10:06, mark lewis writes to Steve Quarrella:

 SQ>> Do you _route_ files, though? :-)  Processing files is one
 SQ>> thing.  Receiving a file from 1:3830/9.9 and passing it onto
 SQ>> 1:3830/9.10 is the objective I'm trying to fulfill.

 ml> did you ever solve this?

Damn it Mark! That was going to be my question too (just catching up on this 
thread), I have the same problem but I don't use route.fe just the built in 
configuration - because route.fe stopped working last time I used it and I just 
switched back to the inbuilt routing.
But looking at it I think "the boys" are correct about the route-to & route-for 
verbs, unfortunately there is no inbuilt equivelent of those that I know of?

Best Rgds, Bazz
barry@glonet.co.nz
---
 * Origin: Global NetWork ARGUS IP Mailer & FTP Fidonet New Zealand (3:774/605)

.