Subj : Re: hello! :DD
To   : Blue White
From : poindexter FORTRAN
Date : Thu Apr 18 2024 06:52 am

-=> Blue White wrote to AKAcastor <=-

 BW> IIRC, if it is an SX it is not completely 32-bit.  I think that meant
 BW> 32 bit processor on a 16 bit bus.  I suspect you are correct re: a 486
 BW> or even a proper 386DX.

I don't know if this is the case with the new DOS handheld, but Intel
made a super low power 386sx for mobile back then - of course power
consumption of any chip pales in comparison to modern systems.

Interesting note I read while wiki-ing this - Windows 95 and Windows NT
3.51 supported the 386 line of processors. 98 and NT 4 required a 486.



.... Don't bite the hand that feeds you WiFi.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
 * Origin: realitycheckBBS.org -- information is power. (21:4/122)

.