Subj : Re: BinkD exec To : Avon From : Al Date : Sat Feb 20 2021 02:20 am Re: Re: BinkD exec By: Avon to Al on Sat Feb 20 2021 10:26 pm Av> I did try things like Av> route crash 21:2/100 21:2/116 Av> route crash 21:2/100 21:2/* Av> but neither seemed to work... it was just packing it direct, hence the Av> need to set something up in BinkD.. but certainly without defining a link Av> with the 2/116 aka it would not pack the message and just delete it. Crash can mean different things to different tossers. Crash should mean send it now following our routing rules. I think in the case of HPT crash means send it now directly. If a message has the crash bit that is what will happen. I use it rarely. I almost always send netmail without it, and in that case the route file defines what happens with netmail. Av> with no link defined. Av> 7 Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 Msg packed with flavour 'crash': 21:1/1 -> 21:2/116 Av> L Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 Msg #1 from 21:1/1 to 21:2/116 deleted Av> D Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 Statistics Av> D Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 areas: 2 msgs: 93 Av> D Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 exported: 1 Av> E Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 Areas summary: Av> E Feb:20:2021:21:56:22 netmail area NETMSG - 1 msgs Av> [snip] Av> with 2//16 defined as a link Av> M Feb:20:2021:22:10:33 pktFile /hub/echomail/out/temp/30d26900.pkt created Av> for [21:2/116] Av> 7 Feb:20:2021:22:10:33 Msg packed with flavour 'crash': 21:1/1 -> 21:2/116 Av> L Feb:20:2021:22:10:33 Msg #1 from 21:1/1 to 21:2/116 deleted Av> M Feb:20:2021:22:10:33 packFile /hub/echomail/out.015/30d26900.sa0 created Av> for [21:2/116 via 21:2/116] Av> O Feb:20:2021:22:10:33 toss.c:arcmail(): opened Av> '/hub/echomail/out.015/00020074.clo' ("a+" mode) Setting the crash bit changes things, the route file doesn't come into play. One other note, when sending netmail directly to an unlinked node it is best (I think) not to archive it. It is going to arrive in the nodes unsecure inbound and some tossers like hpt won't unarchive mail in the unsecure inbound. They will import .pkt files so if it arrives that way it will get tossed. Av> Question.. if this is just a confirmation of segment being processed Av> netmail why would I need the routefile line? My mistake, I thought this was a file routing issue, but it isn't so that won't be needed. Come to think of it, I don't think think there is a routefile statement in my config at all and it is unlikely to be needed. Ttyl :-), Al .... Junk - stuff we throw away. Stuff - junk we keep. --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106.1) .