Subj : file.iniGetObject()
To   : Digital Man
From : MCMLXXIX
Date : Mon Sep 20 2010 09:58 pm

  Re: file.iniGetObject()
  By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Mon Sep 20 2010 15:14:14

 >   Re: file.iniGetObject()
 >   By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Tue Sep 14 2010 08:22 pm
 > 
 >  >   Re: file.iniGetObject()
 >  >   By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
 >  >
 >  >  >   Re: file.iniGetObject()
 >  >  >   By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
 >  >  >
 >  >  >  > Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section");
 >  >  >  > returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section
 >  >  >  > "section" doesn't exi in the file?
 >  >  >  >
 >  >  >  > It's kind of a pain to work around that.
 >  >  >
 >  >  > I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one
 >  >  > cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified
 >  >  > section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values.
 >  >  > The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll
 >  >  > have to see.
 >  >  >
 >  >
 >  > hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
 >  >
 >  > e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and
 >  > null/undefined if it's not there at all
 > 
 > I think I would prefer that behavior. How about you?
 > 

certainly.. saw the commit, thanks!





---
 þ Synchronet þ The BRoKEN BuBBLE (MDJ.ATH.CX)

.