Subj : Google's Go language
To   : Nightfox
From : art
Date : Sun Oct 16 2011 03:16 pm

  Re: Google's Go language
  By: Nightfox to art on Sat Oct 15 2011 14:26:37

Hi Nightfox,

 >  > In the same vein, I really believe the coder is what defines the quality
 >  > program, not the programming language.
 > I agree.  And they say it's a poor craftsman who blames his tools.  Really,
 > can do pretty much anything with any programming language.  Some languages
 > things easier than others though - Some languages give you more framework
 > others upon which to create your projects, and that can make a difference in
 > productivity and the time it takes to get something done.  Although I like

Aye, another big factor for myself, is consistency--i.e,. is the standard
library conceptually consistent.

Although I do agree with what you've said, I have run into several languages
that really seem to be fit for very specific purposes, or, at least, not fit
for specific purposes...

Regs,

  /   art @ fatcats [dot] poorcoding [dot] com    \
  \  Fatcats +o - http://fatcats.poorcoding.com   /

---
 þ Synchronet þ fatcats bbs - http://fatcats.poorcoding.com

.