Subj : Re: Fidonet Policy Document
To   : Ward Dossche
From : Owen Evers
Date : Fri Feb 04 2022 05:24 pm

 WD> OE>WD> You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
 WD> The current one ... this is your entry ...
 WD> Down,9,Paranormal_Panorama_BBS,Hull_E._Yorkshire,Owen_Evers,-Unpublished-,

So it is listed!!!!
and down as I have some things that have priority over a hobby to sort out 
first.
 WD> continously ... down ... and your system unreachable...
 WD> ... which is why you are accessing here from a BBS in another
 WD> Fidonet-zone.
it is not continuously ... (extra 'U') ... down.
the extra U isn't a user flag 'ENC' by the way like your listings ;) 
My system is not unreachable by who i let connect, and only marked as down from 
the ... latest ...FIDO... list. but you already knew that... 
I asked for HOLD also so why try to POLL ? 
I don't and didn't take this echo which is why i posted on Agency.
Sorry but you are wrong on all your comments, and as you also know my BBS is 
and was in the list you should now also have the answer to your first comment 
of why should I care! 

not a very nice attitude from a Zone 2 hat.. again the policy says encourage 
membership... ? not post comments as you have. very un-encouraging and now has 
become annoying. see the policy if you want to know what that means.

All because i thought the policy could do with bringing upto date from the 
80's, and in your position should be something you also want.
This discussion could have been productive if you were approachable, you never 
even commented on what I thought was outdated, just choose to be derogatory.
I hope other HATS see this and how your attitude has been.
Bye...

.... Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/11/06 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (3:770/100)

.