Subj : Fears rising over West Coast tourist route vulnerability To : All From : News Person Date : Sat Mar 09 2024 01:50 pm Fears over the main tourist route through South Westland being cut in two places are on the rise again. The West Coast Regional Council is to step up pressure on roading authorities over the approaches to two sections of State Highway 6. The council is concerned the Wanganui River bridge near Hari Hari and the Whataroa River bridge further south are at risk due to the abutments of both bridges being undercut. The NZ Transport Agency last year dismissed local concern about the Wanganui River bridge. In March 2023, the agency said it was keeping a close watch and was "satisfied" no additional work was needed. In January of 2013, the Wanganui bridge was closed for more than five days after the river washed out the northern approach at a cost to repair of $1m. This week, the council decided to write formally to the agency after the matter was raised at a meeting of the West Coast Regional Transport Committee on January 24. At its January 29 meeting, council staff tabled photos showing the Wanganui River undercutting its true-left bank just above the bridge. A similar trend above the Whataroa River bridge was also reported at the time. 'We've discharged our responsibility' This week, council chief executive Darry Lew told councillors attempts to raise the issue locally with NZTA staff were unsuccessful. Lew said he had now approached the agency's South Island director of regional relationships. "I consider we've discharged our responsibility here, and it's up to them," he said at the February 5 meeting. Councillor Andy Campbell, a Hari Hari farmer, said his concern went beyond the risk to the southern approach of the Wanganui River bridge. "If they don't maintain under their bridge, it makes our rating scheme quite vulnerable," he said. This was because the river could cut in behind rating district stopbanks and into farmland below the main road bridge. Councillor Peter Haddock said he had already expressed "the urgency of it" to NZTA. He said losing the Wanganui River bridge approach "for several weeks" had happened before and would again unless there was proactive maintenance. "That's a stitch in time saves nine. That's been getting pointed out for the last year," he said. 'I think this is a political matter' Councillor Peter Ewen said council management needed to "highlight the urgency of the situation". But Lew said he doubted this would be effective. "I think this is a political matter," he said. Lew said any letter should come from the council chair, in conjunction with the Westland mayor. However, Lew said the purpose of NZTA's rock protection work for their bridges was explicitly to protect "their asset, not farmland behind or any other assets". "I think it is important to understand the only reason they do work is to protect their asset," Lew said. Committee chair Frank Dooley asked if that meant any NZTA work had to take into account "implications on other properties", including council assets. Lew said they only had to take account if their work "exacerbates effects" on other property. Dooley said, if that were the case, and work to protect agency assets could impact on council administered assets like stopbanks, "why shouldn't we raise our concern?" "They are our assets. Regardless of whether NZTA have a closed policy with regards to our assets, we need to be in there boots and all . the letter needs to be written with urgency and in red." Campbell said in his opinion the agency was no longer proactive about protecting its assets including the Wanganui River bridge. "It's very vulnerable. It's political, we should give them a letter and take some photos." Waka Kotahi - NZ Transport Agency has been approached for a response. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A44 2020/02/04 (Windows/64) * Origin: S.W.A.T.S BBS Telnet swatsbbs.ddns.net:2323 (63:10/102) .