Subj : Charter school set-up board says assessments will be a focus To : All From : News Person Date : Tue Apr 09 2024 10:25 am A former private school principal overseeing the return of charter schools says the model will feature greater oversight on student achievement. Charter schools were set up under the National-led government after the 2011 election, as part of an agreement with the ACT Party. The model was abolished in 2018 by the Labour-led Government, who called it a failed experiment, with the 11 operating charter schools then becoming state or special character schools. The Government has announced the formation of an establishment board for creating the new model for charter schools, led by former principal Justine Mahon. Mahon said charter schools offered autonomy to those running them, but this involved a high degree of accountability. A commitment to choice "It's a great responsibility to have the education of children in front of you. So you need to be thinking of new ways in which students can benefit and to do that you need flexibility, and the charter school model allows that." "I am committed to choice which is very fundamental in a healthy democracy, being involved in charter schools is part of that," she said. The Government has indicated it wants charter schools operating next year and Mahon said there would be a clear framework to assess them and clear contractual obligations. "The charter schools that we are about to launch will have to show progression-based assessment. So we will be measuring whether their progress is better than it would have been in any other model." Mahon also said parents need to have choice for their children, so she expected there would be a greater variety of schools and more students participating this time around. 1News contacted some of the former charter schools that were now operating as other school types in the education system. The schools said they were considering returning to charter status but were waiting to see the details of the policy. The school principals said the Government needed to get the model right and one said the establishment board needed to convince the public they could successfully implement charter schools. 'Many schools did not meet some of their contractual performance standards' An advisory group reporting to former Education Minister Chris Hipkins on the performance of charter schools in 2018 said it was unclear whether the scheme achieved its aim - improving the learning of at-risk students who were underserved by the state education system. "Based on the data before us," the advisory group report said, "we can see that many schools did not meet some of their contractual performance standards. "The performance system and information available did not enable us to understand whether charter schools were effective at improving education outcomes for priority learners," the report stated. 'High levels of expense' Victoria University of Wellington School of Education's Dr Bronwyn Wood said last time charter schools didn't deliver a level of innovation to drive achievement that was different than what already occurred in state schools, despite this being the driving factor behind their creation. "Some of them had some levels of success but almost all of them were very small and had high levels of expense associated with them compared to public schools," she said. Wood said New Zealand had one of the most autonomous education systems in the world, with Tomorrow's Schools reforms shifting responsibility for running schools to individual boards of trustees. She also said the sector already had a range of school types with state schools, private schools, state integrated schools, special character schools, different types of Maori-medium schools and Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu - The Correspondence School. Wood said public education was in need of financial investment and instead of funding the reintroduction of charter schools, the Government should invest in training for teaching literacy and fixing school buildings. How do charter schools differ from state schools? Both charter and state schools receive funding from the Government. But charter schools are funded in bulk, whereas public schools are funded for set areas. Charter schools can follow the New Zealand curriculum or set their own, whereas state counterparts must follow the country's curriculum. And with staff salaries and qualification requirements, charter schools set them. Teachers at state schools must be registered and receive set pay rates. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A44 2020/02/04 (Windows/64) * Origin: S.W.A.T.S BBS Telnet swatsbbs.ddns.net:2323 (63:10/102) .