Subj : Stacking, Baying or Boxing Ant To : WW From : G8MNY Date : Wed Aug 28 2019 11:02 pm G8MNY TECH 28.08.19 11:05l 103 Lines 4517 Bytes #365 (0) @ WW BID : 19216_GB7CIP Subj: Stacking, Baying or Boxing Ant Path: OK0NBR SR8BBS SR6DWH SR6BBC SR9ZAA VE2PKT N3HYM GB7YEW N9PMO JE7YGF GB7CIP Sent: 190828/1342Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:19216 [Caterham Surrey GBR] From: G8MNY@GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO To : TECH@WW By G8MNY (Updated Dec 05) (8 Bit ASCII graphics use code page 437 or 850, Terminal Font) AERIAL SPACING Aerial spacing figures are variable depending on what books you read etc, the manufacturers data may help if it is based on real measurements. But without any other information a good guide is about half the boom length for normal Yagi aerials up to 4 wavelengths long. Longer aerials can be stacked closer. Stacking formula to fit some data looks like this... ______________________ Boom length û Boom Wavelengths -1.13 Stacking = ---------------------- Fraction 0.86 Use 2/3 of the boom length (or of the formula above) for the higher gain aerials like Quad loops, loops, HB9 & ZLs. This ONLY a rule of thumb as the relationship to length, gain & capture area is not linear. ______ AERIAL CAPTURE AREAS ______ / \ ______ / \ ³ ³ BAD OVER / \ ³ ³ ³ ³ WASTEFUL LAPPING ³ _ _ _ ³ ³ ³ \______/ MAST ³/ \³ \______/ IDEAL SPACING GAIN ³\_ _ _ /³ / \ NO ______ NO LOSS ³ ³ ³ ³ GAIN / \ GAIN \______/ ³ ³ LOSS ³ ³ LOSS \______/ ³ ³ \______/ Makes sure that the aerial capture areas (as if they were dish aerials) do not overlap. Gain +3dB Ä´ _..... Nearly +3dB +2dB Ä´ ,/'\._ _./' +1dB Ä´ ./'\ / " 0dB _³_.,/' `-.-' ÄÅÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄ Spacing Touching Too Close Half Boom Close Optimum Length Closer stacking or baying, gives variable results as all the aerial elements will couple, & this will result in a different polar diagram & gains less than optimum. But closely mounted aerials with high gains are possible, if difficult to get the distance just right & for just one spot frequency! STACKING, BAYING or BOXING AERIALS The aim of using more aerials is to improve performance by reducing aerial beam lobe size (Beam angle) to increase the gain. ___ __ /' `\ ______ /' `\ __ /' Front `\ ./' `\. ³ « ³ ./' `\. ³ Beam ³ ³ « Area ³ ³ Area ³ ³¬ Area³ \ Area / `\.______./' ³ ³ `\.__./' `\.___./' \.__./ 1 Aerial 2 Aerials Stacked 2 Aerials Bayed 4 Aerials Boxed Gain/one 0dB up to 3dB up to 3dB up to 6dB From these plots you can see that aerial Stacking offers gain without the reduction of horizon beamwidth, or reduction of contact opportunity. With 2 Bayed aerials or 4 Boxed aerials with its nice 6dB gain, there is loss of contact opportunity if Dx stations are not around on that beam heading. Another point often forgotten is that both aerials should see the same RF field to work. If one aerial is much closer to the ground or buildings it can cancel any advantage as Rx signal power can actually be lost in the lower aerial! ÃÅÅÅÅÅ - - - - - - - - Even Dx ³ _ - - - - RF Field ÃÅÅÅÅÅ - / \ - - - ³ ³ ³ ÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÁÄÄ SIDE LOBES The baying distance also affects side lobe nulls. This is very difficult to get right, as a fraction of a wavelength of boom location or movement can cause tightly nulled out lobes to reappear. Single Aerial Bayed @ an exact multiple of « wavelenths . ___ Side Nulled Side /|\ / `\. Lobes .ÄÄ....__ Lobes Beam | Main `\v^v/³_ Aerial ,/' Main ``-...__ ÃÄÅÄÅÄÅÄÅÅ´ Width ³ Front @ _) ÃÄÅÄÅÄÅÄÅÅ´ ³ Front @ __) Aerials | | Lobe ./^v^\³ Back `\ Lobe __..-'''Back ÃÄÅÄÅÄÅÄÅÅ´ \|/ \___./' Lobe ``ÄÄ'''' Lobe ' --Gain---- -----Gain------ See my bulletins on 4x Power Splitters for 2M & 70cm, Making a Phasing Harness. Why Don't U send an interesting bul? --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 (Linux/32) * Origin: HAMRADIO telnet slacko.kozow.com (21:5/101) .