>I fully agree, and I'm not saying all things are equally good. Now, is
>Bach better than, say, Handel? That's worth discussing.
Yes, Bach is better than Handel. Any other questions?
-Jacob
(Actually, while I'm at it, let me settle some other thorny questions:
1) To be.
2) The egg.
3) As much wood as a woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.