----------------------------------------
       divination
       July 17th, 2020
       ----------------------------------------
       
       A few days ago I coded a shell-script version of the I Ching (Book
       of Changes), and made it accessible on Gemini [0]. In the process
       I added a note on the Gemini site quickly addressing some concerns
       over the use of digital tools for divination. It all felt rushed
       and incomplete and I think I have more to say on the subject,
       perhaps a lot more. Gemini isn't the place for that, though. This
       is definitely a gopher topic.
       
 (HTM) [0] I Ching Shell Script
       
       I practice a number of forms of divination including consulting
       the I Ching, tarot cards, tasseography, cleromancy (whether with
       dice, dominos, or runes), and so on. There's a number of forms
       I don't practice for various reasons: horoscopy, gematria,
       extispicy (ew), ouija, augury, and oh so many more. Someone has
       figured out a way to use just about anything for divination.
       
       Before we get too far into this, let me drop some dictionary magic
       on you. Here's the definition from two online dictionaries: 
       
         Divination: 
         
         1. the practice of seeking knowledge of the future or the
            unknown by supernatural means
       
         2. the art or practice that seeks to foresee or foretell future
            events or discover hidden knowledge usually by the
            interpretation of omens or by the aid of supernatural powers
       
       Seeking knowledge, usually hidden knowledge, by the aid of the
       supernatural. Cool. Got it?
       
       So there are a billion forms of divination out there, but why? Do
       they all work? Do any of them work? How do they purport to work?
       Lets focus on the last bit first. How does divination work? This
       is the interesting bit for me at least.
       
       In cleromancy the mechanism of action is some sort of randomness.
       Cleromancy is about "tossing stuff" like dice and seeing what
       comes up. Some practitioners suggest that the randomness allows
       the supernatural to take direct action and influence the results
       of the toss. Other practitioners would say that the toss and its
       randomness is just that and not influenced by the supernatural,
       but the querent (person seeking information) must use their
       intuition to understand the results of the toss. That type of
       practitioner moves the supernatural action internal to the
       unconscious mind and changes its domain of action to the
       interpretation alone. But there are still other types! Some see
       the unconscious mind as affecting the toss itself in a sort of
       blend of the first two. Others shy away from intuition and suggest
       self-reflection and psychology allow the interpretation of any
       symbol to be helpful as a means of thinking in a new way about the
       issue.
       
       Yeesh, that's a lot, and that's just cleromancy! But what about
       chartomancy (books & cards)? Is the mechanism of action different?
       
       On the one hand, there are far more established symbols present
       in, say, a tarot card than in a rune. Consulting the I Ching or
       the Bible likewise greatly increases the available symbols and
       interpretations. The act itself is still governed by some sort of
       randomness, or chaotic action as I like to call it. Shuffling
       cards, separating yarrow stalks, even flipping pages promotes some
       sort of uncertainty and allows for the possibility of and unknown.
       
       Does this unknown mean that a supernatural power is guiding the
       result? That's a matter of faith and, ultimately, irrelevant. What
       about the interpretation? Is that guided by a supernatural power?
       Again, a question of faith that has no ultimate bearing on the
       value of divination. What‽
       
       Yeah, you read me correctly. I'm saying that it doesn't matter if
       there's no supernatural involved at all or if there is. The aim of
       divination is to seek to foresee the future or discover hidden
       knowledge and divination can succeed in  both cases regardless of
       the origin of its power.
       
       Lets side with the pragmatic doubter practitioner for a moment and
       assume that there's no magic at work here at all. We're going to
       go through some exercise that will result in symbols ready for
       interpretation. The process we have just taken was designed to
       orient our mind to the problem, focus upon it seriously, perhaps
       spending a significant amount of time in so doing. We are now
       asked to review and interpret these forms which have a variety of
       possible meanings requiring we try to apply them systematically
       and in various combinations to the problem or subject. That
       thought process involves mental judo and an openness to new ideas.
       It will inevitably bring insight and... wait for it... hidden
       knowledge. It will also undoubtedly influence future actions and
       have a major impact on the events to come. BAM! Divined.
       
       Now, allow yourself to take the seat as an individual who has
       faith in the machinations of the supernatural. Given even a hint
       of influence from that "other", the results gain significance and
       their origins may carry more weight, but the interpretation and
       internalization of that information is unchanged. It really
       doesn't matter.
       
       I really enjoy the processes, especially the lengthy ones with
       much ritual like the yarrow stalk I Ching method, or the ones that
       are inherently delicious like tasseography (reading tea leaves).
       
       If I have any advice to give on the subject it is to enter into
       divination with healthy skepticism, not to undermine the results
       but to fully engage with them. Don't take any reading at face
       value or you've done yourself a disservice.