What is Truth?

What is Truth? The answer is simple. Truth is the logical operator
of binary Aristotelian logic (True or False/Yes or No). The final
state that exists only in the mind of the observer. Formal logic is
a construct of human thinking, limited to two states, regardless of
the statements being discussed. It is precisely because of the
narrow framework of Aristotle's logic that the so-called logical
loops arose, which are best traced, for example, in the course of
theological discussions of Armean and Calvinists. For centuries,
these two leading Protestant sects have failed to resolve the issue
of predestination. Will all repentant sinners be saved, or only
the elect?
This controversy is based on the binary logical contradictions of
the New Testament, which contains mutually exclusive statements,
interpreted in different ways by different theologians. From synergy,
we know that there are at least twenty final states of order, to
which the elements of chaos eventually come. That is, in theory,
we should have at least twenty variants of logical operators to
describe mental constructs as part of the system. This means that
the chaos created by theologians must have at least twenty options
for solving the problem regarding the salvation of the souls of
believers. Let me remind you once again that all the so-called
"most insoluble social problems" depend solely on the view of
the observer at them.
The salvation of the souls of adepts today will include such
variants of events as true, false, possible, meaningless, according
to the quantum logic of Garith Bierhof and John von Neumann.
If we continue to talk about the problem of logical loops in the
New Testament, then we can easily find another fact that depends
solely on the observer. Nowhere is it written that the interpretation
of Christian texts should proceed from the rules of binary logic.
This means that it is theoretically possible to use another logical
model to resolve the dispute between Armean and Calvinists.
The so-called fuzzy logic, which uses a wider range of options
instead of standard values, including True, False, Perhaps,
Sometimes, I don’t remember, As if Yes, Why not, Not decided
yet, I will not say, and so on. We owe this intellectual gift, which
allows us to look at everyday problems in a new way, to Lotfi Zadeh,
an Azerbaijani mathematician and logician, who proposed the
"Theory of fuzzy sets" in 1965, and expounded the "Theory of
fuzzy logic and the theory of soft computing" in 1973.
The bottom line is the following. The human mind is able to endow
the elements of chaos in the surrounding reality with order. However,
as can be seen from synergetics, even academic researchers are
sliding down to the level of animals competing for territory, trying
to defend exclusivity. Like the Armean theologians and Calvinists,
many people wander inside logical loops that turn the mind into a
static cycle of events. After all, no one prevents the same Armean
and Calvinist theologians from conducting a mathematical analysis
of the number of quotations from an incorrectly translated version
of the Hebrew Bible, which confirm the correctness of one of the
points of view. It is possible that percentage probability will prove
to be the overwhelming argument in a century-long debate.
That is why the smartphone is Aristotle's amputated logic, striving
for one of two states. That is, in essence, a system that requires a
description of all actions to execute the program that determines
the behavior. And as long as you limit yourself to the results of
two logical operators, although you have more than twenty
options in stock, many important problems will remain unresolved.
Because they, like the debate of theologians, are in the fantasy of
the observer.