Big Tech blocks the truth about Covid for WEF money

Source: (https://bit.ly/3ta7V1M)
A study has confirmed that the mainstream media (MSM) and Big
Tech are censoring doctors who have the courage to challenge the
Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) narrative.
The paper published Nov. 2 in Minerva was written by a team of
researchers from universities in Israel and Australia. It detailed
the experiences of medical professionals who spoke out against
public health mandates to curb COVID-19. While it revealed the
censorship the aforementioned medical professionals faced, the
study also elaborated on how they responded to the suppression.
"The emergence of COVID-19 has led to numerous controversies
over COVID-related knowledge and policy," they wrote. It also gave
rise to a "perceived threat from doctors and scientists who challenge
the official position of governmental and intergovernmental health
authorities" - with the study authors branding this "official
position" as an "orthodoxy."
They added that supporters of the orthodoxy "have moved to censor
those who promote dissenting views."
"Our findings point to the central role played by media
organizations, and especially by information technology companies,
in an attempt to stifle debate over COVID-19 policy and measures."
According to the researchers, this was accomplished through
"widespread use of censorship [and] tactics of suppression that
damaged the reputations and careers of dissenting doctors and
scientists, regardless of their academic or medical status and their
stature prior to expressing a contrary position."
Some of the respondents who spoke to the study authors recounted
that the MSM, "which until then had seen them as desirable
interviewees, stopped interviewing them and accepting opinion pieces
from them." These same media outlets disparaged them as
"anti-vaxxers," "COVID deniers," "dis- and mis-information spreaders"
and/or "conspiracy theorists." Aside from these, "fact checkers" and
other doctors were used to publicly undermine the skeptic doctors and
their associates.
They also "reported being censored on social media" through the
removal of their content, if not their entire accounts. The removals
would be "accompanied by a notice claiming they had violated the
'community rules.'"
Because of this, the authors stated: "In place of open and fair
discussion, censorship and suppression of scientific dissent has
deleterious and far-reaching implications for medicine, science and
public health."
While the study detailed the experiences of the professionals who
faced censorship for going against the grain, it also expounded on
their responses to the suppression.
"Their initial reaction to the attacks and censorship [were] shock
and surprise, since for the first time in their lives, they felt
excluded, … attacked by the media and sometimes by their
employers … and/or disparaged," the study stated.
"Yet despite the censorship; the personal attacks and defamation;
the dismissals; the damage to reputations and the economic price
- all respondents nevertheless stated that none of it deterred them,
and they decided to fight back using various counter-tactics."