It Would Have Been So Much Worse If I Hadn't Been Vaxed

Source: (https://bit.ly/3jV2jqB)
Two years ago, when the first tranches of COVID-19 "vaccines"
were rolled out to the general public, the mRNA injections were
still experimental. Prior to their release, the clinical trials of the
jab were brief, limited, and methodologically compromised by
the eventual "vaccination" of members of the control group,
ostensibly on humanitarian grounds. That little trick guaranteed
that there could be no longitudinal studies going forward comparing
vaxed participants with the control group.
Obviously, there were no data at that time on the long-term side
effects of the vax, since the mRNA treatments had been developed
too recently to have acquired any track record longer than a few
months. As a result, the "vaccination" of billions of test subjects
all across the world became a gigantic clinical experiment to test
the long-term effects of the treatment. The entire Corona
project - first the release of a genetically modified coronavirus,
followed by the administration of billions of doses of the mRNA
injections - was arguably the largest medical/biological experiment
in history.
In early 2021, when vax skeptics predicted dire consequences from
the mRNA experiments, they had no clinical data to back up their
projections. But all that has changed now - there is as much as two
years' worth of evidence to look at, although the UN and
governmental entities have done their best to bury any statistics
that might cause cracks to appear in the "Safe and Effective" edifice
built to reassure everyone who rolled up his sleeve to get jabbed.
Germany looks to be the best source of statistics on the deleterious
effects of the mRNA injections. The biomedical establishment in
Germany is sophisticated and well-funded, and is staffed by
clinicians who are less corrupt than those in most Western
countries.
Furthermore, German culture is rule-based. Following the rules
is important to the collective German psyche. This characteristic
has its downside, which hardly needs to be pointed out to anyone
familiar with the last hundred years of European history. But it
also has its advantages, which are now coming to the fore as German
scientists and medical experts follow the rules to document the
effects of the COVID-19 "vaccines".
The AfD's excess mortality video report is notable for revealing the
corrupt behavior of two major German public health institutions, the
Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute. Both are
required by law to collect statistics on the adverse effects of
vaccines and make them publicly available, and both have failed
to follow their function, despite the availability of the relevant
data.
The AfD researchers who provided the data for the video are
restrained in their presentation, but their outrage is nonetheless
palpable. Nothing offends German sensibilities more than the failure
to carry out a public duty with which one has been charged. Thanks
to such sentiments - held in common by uncorrupted German public
officials - we can expect more investigations of the deadly effects
of the vax, even though the revealed data may contradict the
established Narrative about the safety and effectiveness of the
mRNA treatments.
Back in early 2021 I thought that when such data eventually became
available, it would force pro-vaxers to re-examine their position.
However, in the interim my opinion has shifted: I don't think any
factual data, no matter how clear and well-sourced, will change
the minds of anyone who enthusiastically supports the COVID-19
"vaccine".
My conclusions are based on personal experience. Last year I posted
about an old friend of mine who was very afraid of the Wuhan
Coronavirus. At the beginning of the pandemic he retreated into
isolation and followed the directives of the CDC in minute detail.
And, needless to say, when the experimental mRNA injections were
introduced, he embraced them eagerly.
I hadn't seen him in many years, so in the late summer of 2021, when
my travel plans were slated to take me to his general vicinity,
I proposed that we meet for coffee. By then he had been vaxed and
double-boosted, but I knew he was still very afraid of COVID.
I suggested that we meet outdoors, wear masks, and sit more than
six feet apart. To no avail - he said: "No, I can't risk it."
More than anything else, this exchange made me realize the depth
of the Coronamadness. It makes no sense. It's utterly irrational.
It's a form of mass insanity.
Since then, of course, even the CDC has acknowledged that the
"vaccine" doesn't protect recipients from being infected with the
virus or transmitting it to others. Logic would then dictate that
it shouldn't make any difference to him whether or not I am vaxed,
and he could meet me under the same conditions that he imposes
on his contacts with friends and family members who are vaxed.
But it doesn't make any difference - he still can't risk it.
I don't think I'll ever see him again in person. We send each other
letters and cards, and have occasional pleasant phone conversations,
but I assume I'll go the rest of my life without ever seeing him
face-to-face across a table in a coffee shop.
I expect the evidence of mass injury and death due to the "vaccine"
to become so widespread that it will eventually appear in the media,
albeit spun in a form that minimizes the gravity of the situation.
But even if the data are fully and factually available, it won't
induce the adherents of vax ideology - or the victims of Corona
Psychosis, if you prefer - to change their minds.
Among the proponents of the vax, opinions are now fully entrenched
and well-defended. Getting the injections is what keeps them "safe".
Those who refuse it are a danger to public health and must be
shunned.
Devotion to vax has all the characteristics of a religion. Its
beliefs are not susceptible to refutation through logic. Its
adherents become angry and hysterical when confronted with
a countervailing opinion. They are willing to shift the tenets of
their dogma when necessary, in order to maintain the overall
structure of the belief system. And they are willing to go to their
death rather than renounce their faith.
Regardless of the availability of data showing the harm caused by
the treatments, I expect vax adherents to get boosted over and over
again, whenever the newest iteration of the vax is officially
approved.
And, when they are lying on their deathbed, suffering from
myocarditis or thrombosis or fast-spreading cancer, I expect them
to say to themselves:
"Just think how much worse it would have been if I hadn't been
vaccinated!"