20 awkward questions about vaccinations

1. If the vaccinated believe in vaccines against COVID-19, then what do they care about the unvaccinated? After all, they are reliably protected by vaccination. Or no? Then why do it, since the vaccine does not protect? And if "it protects weakly and unreliably and can cause a side effect", then why force it on others?

2. If the virus mutates quickly and new strains spread, what is the point of being vaccinated with the old vaccine? The same problem has always been with the flu vaccine, it did not help with a new epidemic, but simply burdened the immune system.

3. Why do we hear agitation from only one, "official" side, that is, from those who benefit from it. That is, for economic rather than medical reasons? What to do with the opinion of a large number of scientists and specialists who negatively relate to hastily manufactured vaccines (which did not pass all tests) and to the total vaccination of the population?

4. Why are peoples forced to sign a voluntary consent including a waiver of claims during vaccination? Why is there no insurance against the side effects of vaccinations? Why is this not planned? How can an ordinary person prove that the harm to his health was caused by vaccination?

5. Who will guarantee that the disease, including death, is really worse than the possible negative consequences for the health of the vaccinated? What will people be like a few years after vaccination? What kind of children will be born? If they are born. Why has the vaccine not officially passed all the tests, but is already being used forcibly with might and main?

6. Is artificial immunity better than what humanity could develop with its organisms? How do new strains - viral mutations appear? Could it be that they arise as a reaction of an "unfinished" virus to an unfinished drug that does not completely destroy it?

7. Why is a disease that is not statistically a pandemic called a pandemic and is treated like a pandemic? Excluding, however, the introduction of state of emergency, since they imply real economic support for the population, and not minimal payments to certain categories of citizens.

8. We all know cases when vaccinated people fell ill a couple of months after vaccination, and fell ill with complications. Does the vaccine work or not? Before the advent of Covid, have you heard of any other vaccines that "will be milder"?

9. If the vaccine still works, how much, on average, does it work in reality? If the vaccine works not enough, say, one season, then people are forever "on the needle"? Are we now forever addicted to constant injections? How soon will we get booster vaccinations for a fee and live "by subscription"?

10. How many boosters can a healthy adult tolerate on average? Not very healthy man? And the child? And the old man?

11. How to explain the fact that the presence of their own antibodies is not taken into account if the authorities want to totally vaccinate everyone? At the same time, the presence of a QR code is a sign of a "white person" and his "reliability".

12. What do the authorities want to achieve by pursuing a policy of segregation of the forced division of society? With ban the rights of those who, for whatever reason, do not want or cannot be vaccinated?

13. Why stir up an atmosphere of fear, mutual hatred and even simple dissatisfaction with actions in society? Where is the widespread campaigning for a healthy lifestyle, sobriety, proper nutrition, environmentally friendly behavior? Maybe it would be more conducive to strengthening the immune system and defeating the virus?

14. How normal is it that hundreds of thousands of people have already been warned by their leadership about the need for vaccination and are faced with a choice: loss of job or vaccination?

15. For what reason is there no coordinated actions of the state apparatus on the measures introduced?

16. Since when did the artificial immunity formed as a result of vaccination be considered better than the natural one that appears after recovery from the disease?

17. To what extent does the issuance of electronic marks on any basis fit into the norms of universal human morality?

18. To what extent does pressure and an attempt to force those who do not want to be vaccinated for moral, ethical or religious reasons, such as Christians and Muslims, to be vaccinated fit into the norms of morality? For what is the condemnation or persecution of those who, either morally or physically, cannot agree to this practice?

19. How desperate are the times of the massive COVID-19 disease, or is it an artificial whipping up of hysteria?

20. Why does a person not have the right to decide whether to vaccinate him and his children or not? And if you think that those who refuse vaccinations are a threat to everything around, then read the first question again.