(DIR) Home
        
        
       Bank of Canada should cut rates with or without the Fed
        
 (HTM) Source
        
       ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        
       Breadcrumb Trail Links
        
         1. Economy
        
       # David Rosenberg: Tanking economy, productivity mean Bank of Canada
       should cut rates with or without the Fed
        
       Canada can cope with a weaker dollar; in fact the country needs it
        
       Published May 07, 2024 • Last updated May 07, 2024 • 4 minute read
        
       You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if
       you have an account.
        
       Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem, left, should not wait for
       Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to cut rates, says David
       Rosenberg.  Photo by Getty Images
        
       ## Article content
        
       We find it rather incredible that the Bank of Canada is so nonchalant
       when it comes to the state of the Canadian economy. The degree of
       excess capacity is expanding by the month, inflation has swung to
       disinflation and the economy (in real output per-capita terms) is
       contracting at a two per cent annual rate. Yet the folks in Ottawa
       fiddle as the macro landscape burns.
        
       Advertisement 2
        
       This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues
       below.
        
       THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
        
       Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
        
         * Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Fri
         * Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global bus
         * Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, Nati
         * National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition t
         * Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
        
       SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
        
       Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
        
         * Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Fri
         * Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global bus
         * Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, Nati
         * National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition t
         * Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
        
       REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
        
       Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
        
         * Access articles from across Canada with one account.
         * Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
         * Enjoy additional articles per month.
         * Get email updates from your favourite authors.
        
       ## Sign In or Create an Account
        
       or
        
       Article content
        
       Business insolvencies have soared 87 per cent over the past year to
       the highest level since the peak of anxiety in 2008 when the global
       financial crisis was raging. The number of people entering the labour
       market without landing a job has practically doubled those who found
       one over the past year. That has resulted in more than a 20 per cent
       year-over-year surge in the ranks of the unemployed and it seems
       amazing to think that Bank of Canada officials are unaware of that
       statistic.
        
       Article content
        
       Any concerns over a resurrection of the housing bubble should be put
       to rest by now, with home sales in the once-hot Greater Toronto Area
       chilling 3.4 per cent month over month in April, losing ground in each
       of the past three months and down five per cent from year-ago levels.
       At the same time, new listings have ballooned 47 per cent year over
       year, and this new demand-supply backdrop has created the conditions
       for a flattening out in residential real estate prices.
        
       Now that shelter costs are beginning to stabilize in real time, it
       won't be long before its inflationary effects fade from the consumer
       price index data because the headline inflation rate in Canada, absent
       the housing component, is running at a grand total of 1.5 per cent,
       melting before our very eyes from 3.9 per cent a year ago and 6.6 per
       cent two years ago.
        
       By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from
       Postmedia Network Inc.
        
       Thanks for signing up!
        
       A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your
       junk folder.
        
       The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
        
       We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
        
       Advertisement 3
        
       This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues
       below.
        
       Article content
        
       If you don't think the Bank of Canada can cut rates without help from
       the United States Federal Reserve, think again. This happened in
       1996-1997, 1999 and 2003-2004. How far can it deviate? Well, let's
       just say that in early 1997, with the Canadian economy heading into a
       different orbit than the U.S. under the budget belt tightening by the
       Jean Chrétien-Paul Martin dynamic duo, the overnight rate in Canada
       got as low as three per cent while the Fed funds rate was pinned at
       5.5 per cent. There is precedent.
        
       As for the Canadian dollar, well, sure, it will depreciate, and in two
       of those prior periods of monetary policy divergence (1999 and 2003),
       it took almost $1.50 to buy a U.S. dollar. What of it? The economy
       needs stimulus and currency depreciation is one key to easing domestic
       monetary conditions. Besides, we are so damned uncompetitive in this
       country, with negative productivity growth and no capital deepening at
       all for well over a decade, that unit labour costs in U.S. dollar
       terms are running at five per cent year over year, which compares very
       poorly to the 1.8 per cent trend south of the border.
        
       Advertisement 4
        
       This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues
       below.
        
       Article content
        
       Even without the Bank of Canada going its own way, the country sadly
       needs a weaker exchange rate as an ongoing crutch just to realign our
       cost structure with the U.S. and stem the tide of net direct
       investment outflows. In other words, we are sure nobody is even aware
       of the dramatic erosion that has taken place when it comes to net
       direct investment (this is "bricks and mortar," not paper securities),
       but there has been a net outflow of real capital out of the country
       each and every year since 2014 totalling nearly $400 billion (more
       than $50 billion alone in 2023).
        
       This is why the Canadian dollar remains in a fundamental bear market
       and why it is that even in periods when oil and industrial commodities
       hook up, there is a muted Canadian dollar response. It is not because
       the "terms of trade" effect is broken as much as it has been weakened
       by this relentless decay in domestic competitiveness relative to the
       U.S.
        
       In other words, we have to cut our prices internationally just to
       protect our share of the global export market, and in the process, the
       nation is compelled to accept a wage cut, and there was nothing in the
       recent federal budget to address this chronic shortfall in terms of
       domestic competitiveness.
        
       Advertisement 5
        
       This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues
       below.
        
       Article content
        
       It would be funny if it weren't so sad that economic documents such as
       the budget turn into political manifestos aimed at buying votes in the
       name of "fairness" over "growth."
        
       How is it that the Liberals are so adept at divvying up the national
       income pie instead of thinking creatively to expand it. It's as if the
       term "productivity" to the politicians, bureaucrats and mandarins in
       Canada is a dirty 12-letter word. Better to pursue supply-side growth
       through an unprecedented immigration policy stance (never mind that
       there has been no economic payback, judging by the continuous
       contraction in real output and income in per-capita terms) than embark
       on measures to bolster productivity growth, which is the mother's milk
       for future prosperity. But why bother when nobody outside the realm of
       economics even understands what productivity means, and it's neither
       an attention grabber in election campaigns nor a vote getter at the
       polls.
        
       Brian Mulroney and Michael Wilson got it. Chretien and Martin got it.
       But Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland? Not so much.
        
        _David Rosenberg is founder and president of independent research
       firm Rosenberg Research & Associates Inc. To receive more of David
       Rosenberg's insights and analysis, you can sign up for a
       complimentary, one-month trial on the Rosenberg Research website._
        
        _ **Bookmark our website and support our journalism:** Don't miss the
       business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your
       bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here._
        
       Share this article in your social network
        
        
        
        
       ______________________________________________________________________
                                                 Served by Flask-Gopher/2.2.1