(DIR) Home
        
        
       Woman breaks down in court detailing alleged rape inside Sydney police
       station
        
 (HTM) Source
        
       ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        
       She said that when she refused, Coleman said, "Fine, I'll just keep
       it", but she responded, "No, wait," because she was scared Coleman
       wouldn't help her with the complaint about her ex-boyfriend.
        
       Coleman's trial is expected to last up to three weeks.Credit: Rhett
       Wyman
        
       She asked if she could leave after doing the sexual act "for a
       minute," and he said yes, so she put her phone timer on for one minute
       and performed the act.
        
       After that, she said Coleman asked to have sex "for one minute", and
       she agreed because she "at least wanted to have some control".
        
       "He could see that I didn't want to, and he didn't care," she said.
        
       "I'm just looking at him horrified like I just couldn't believe it,"
       she said, saying she put her timer on for another minute and had sex
       with him so she could leave.
        
       Loading
        
       "He started moaning, and I left myself there until the timer went
       off," she told the court while crying.
        
       She said she took the $70 on the table before leaving because she was
       "pissed".
        
       During cross-examination late on Wednesday, defence barrister Joel
       Brook suggested the woman was either unable to remember or was making
       up what happened during the three times she met Coleman at the police
       station because her evidence did not match her police statement.
        
       "I suggest your memory isn't particularly good as you sit here today,"
       he said, to which the woman said: "My memory is fine".
        
       "Are you just making it up as you go along when you talk about that
       March 2, 2022 meeting?" Brooke asked after pointing out there were
       conversations mentioned in the police statement that were not included
       in her court evidence. The woman denied this.
        
       Brook told the court Coleman kept the police meetings professional
       until the woman brought up having an interview at a strip club and a
       conversation about escorting. The woman said she told Coleman about
       the strip club because Coleman asked what she was doing on the
       weekend.
        
       "You agree that auditions at strip clubs had nothing to do with
       anything Mr Coleman was investigating for you," Brook asked, to which
       the woman agreed.
        
       Brook asked why she invited him to watch her dance at a strip club
       before any of the alleged sexual touching took place. She said he had
       already said inappropriate things to her, and inviting him to the
       strip club was a way to keep the situation under control because the
       visitors couldn't touch the workers.
        
       The woman's cross-examination will continue Thursday.
        
       Coleman was arrested on May 20, 2022, and stood down from the force in
       September of that year.
        
       He has pleaded not guilty to three counts of sexual intercourse
       without consent, six counts of sexual touching without consent and one
       count of abusing his position of public office to procure the woman
       for his own sexual gratification.
        
       Brook told the court his client denies "he ever sexually touched or
       had sexual intercourse with the complainant without her free or wilful
       consent".
        
       The trial before Judge Robert Montgomery continues.
        
        
        
        
       ______________________________________________________________________
                                                 Served by Flask-Gopher/2.2.1