[HN Gopher] Ottawa Library fines people using unreliable automat...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ottawa Library fines people using unreliable automatic calling
       system (1994)
        
       Author : cnst
       Score  : 28 points
       Date   : 2020-01-06 04:13 UTC (18 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (catless.ncl.ac.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (catless.ncl.ac.uk)
        
       | tekstar wrote:
       | Since this is oddly on the front page I want to shout out the OPL
       | for being a great place for everybody. I love libraries. There
       | are so few places you can go with no expectation that you will
       | purchase something.
       | 
       | OPL also has a $100k makerspace available at the Centerpointe
       | location with multiple 3D printers,scanners, and laser cutters.
       | All available for free (if you can book a spot!)
        
       | ogre_codes wrote:
       | Every library I've been to has told me the return date when I
       | checked out the book and stamped on the library card or receipt
       | you get when checking out the book. For decades there was no
       | phone call/ notification, you'd get a letter in the mail after
       | you'd already started racking up late fees.
       | 
       | Regardless of how broken their notification system is, keeping
       | track of the return date has always been the borrower's
       | responsibility.
        
         | jackcarter wrote:
         | This is about the notification that a book is ready for pickup.
        
           | nogabebop23 wrote:
           | yes - Calgary used to fine you $2 if you did not pick up a
           | hold within 7 days, now it just expires. I wonder if it was
           | the same specific motivation or the PITA of collecting fines
           | in general.
        
       | tantalor wrote:
       | > if you do not pick up the book in three days, you are fined
       | $2.00
       | 
       | Why would a library fine you for _not_ borrowing a book? That is
       | the opposite of how libraries work!
        
         | nogabebop23 wrote:
         | Because you can go online and place holds on many books and the
         | library will ship them to your prefered branch once available
         | and then shelve them for pick-up. There's a significant amount
         | of effort and cost, plus most holds are for the same limited
         | supply of popular books; while your hold is sitting there
         | counteless others are waiting.
         | 
         | The fine is to discourage making hold requests and then never
         | claiming them.
        
           | andi999 wrote:
           | Maybe it got canned because the pickup dates are not
           | predictable. If I place hold on a book with e.g. two holds on
           | it already by somebody else, the book will be ready in 2
           | month if each person keeps the book for 1 month. If each
           | person returns it on the spot its basically 2 days. Good luck
           | planning your holidays ard that.
        
       | lerie wrote:
       | why is this even here? it happened more than 2 decades ago.
        
       | red-indian wrote:
       | For years my public library charged a $3 fee to get a book sent
       | from another library in the system.
       | 
       | At some point I was chatting with a librarian about this and she
       | revealed they had eliminated the fee so as not to discourage the
       | use of interlibrary loans.
       | 
       | I few weeks later I tried checking out something from another
       | library and was then treated to a 10 minute lecture on how it
       | costs them $20 to process these loans and am I really sure I want
       | it.
       | 
       | No thanks. I'll just get it for a penny plus $3.99 shipping from
       | amazon, less than the cost of gasoline to drive into town to
       | order it, pick it up, and return it (3 round trips).
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | >No thanks. I'll just get it for a penny plus $3.99 shipping
         | from amazon
         | 
         | There are books for a penny on Amazon?
        
           | colechristensen wrote:
           | The shipping charge covers whatever meager profit they get.
           | 
           | Something like the profitability of collecting cans for the
           | deposit.
        
           | nitwit005 wrote:
           | Quite a lot of them. The publishers are quite upset at the
           | price collapse of used books as people go grab those up.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | That's really a shame. My library will transfer any book, DVD,
         | computer game, power tool, or even a wifi hotspot from another
         | library for free and usually within two days.
         | 
         | As recently as this past fall I requested books from libraries
         | in New Mexico and New York and both came with zero fees.
         | 
         | I sure hope your local library system has dropped their fees by
         | now.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ramshorns wrote:
       | The author mentions parking tickets as a possible future
       | automatic fine that could be unreliable. Red light cameras were
       | introduced in Ontario in 1998, which automatically issue fines to
       | the vehicle owner, and automatic speed enforcement is being
       | rolled out now.
       | 
       | I guess the difference is that it improves road safety, which
       | library fines don't, and that you can contest the ticket with a
       | human in traffic court.
        
         | Rebelgecko wrote:
         | >I guess the difference is that it improves road safety
         | 
         | I don't think this is necessarily true for red light cameras.
         | Many studies have shown that they lead to more fatalities and
         | more collisions (fewer people getting T-boned when they run red
         | lights, offset by more people getting rear ended when they slam
         | on the brakes so they don't get a ticket). Other studies have
         | also found that cameras reduce collisions and deaths, so I
         | think to some extent it's still an open question and the answer
         | may vary in different locations.
        
         | nogabebop23 wrote:
         | >> I guess the difference is that it improves road safety
         | 
         | Exactly - just like when I want to change the way my kids are
         | acting:
         | 
         | I pick a random occurrence of a specific behaviour, punish them
         | well after the fact and they inevitably draw the correct cause
         | => effect linkage and never repeat the targeted behaviour
         | again.
         | 
         | </s>
        
         | jonny_eh wrote:
         | > automatic speed enforcement is being rolled out now
         | 
         | It was already rolled out in the 90s, then removed by a
         | different government in the 2000s. It was called "Photo-radar".
         | 
         | > Photo radar was introduced to the province's major highways
         | in the early 1990s by Bob Rae's NDP government, but the
         | controversial project was scrapped by Mike Harris' Progressive
         | Conservatives.
         | 
         | https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/photo-radar-makes-com...
        
         | Maxious wrote:
         | 25 years later, automated parking tickets via number plate
         | recognition vans are here:
         | 
         | > One of the more amusing reasons for Smart Parking's loss was
         | flagged in its interim numbers in February when the company
         | told investors its cash cow of issuing parking fines was being
         | bled by "increased driver compliance resulting in fewer PBNs
         | [parking breach notifications] being issued".
         | 
         | https://www.itnews.com.au/news/automated-and-iot-parking-fin...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-01-06 23:00 UTC)