[HN Gopher] Soviet Calculators History (1998)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Soviet Calculators History (1998)
        
       Author : erikbye
       Score  : 42 points
       Date   : 2020-02-17 20:18 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.xnumber.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.xnumber.com)
        
       | avmich wrote:
       | Revers-engineering of B3-34 internals (in Russian):
       | http://vak.ru/doku.php/proj/calculator/b3-34 .
        
       | ruslan wrote:
       | I loved my MK 85 a lot! When I was at school in late 80s I used
       | to store complex physics and trigonometrics formulas in it as a
       | BASIC program text. Those days using calculators was allowed on
       | exams so this little electronic cheat-sheet saved my sole many
       | times :-).
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | aswanson wrote:
       | Max levchin stated he learned indirection in memory addressing
       | because his mom was assigned to work calculator programming in
       | the USSR before the family fled to the US in the early 90s.
       | Amazing that a calculator had pointer features.
        
       | rdtsc wrote:
       | > the calculator combined not only the functions [+=] and [-=],
       | but also the multiply-divide functions [X -:-].
       | 
       | Very interesting. It finally solved the mystery for me. My aunt
       | was an accountant and she had one of those in her office. I
       | remember looking at the keyboard and wondering how in the world
       | you're supposed to divide and multiply with a single button. [-=]
       | seems to be something like "invert the previous operation and
       | then produce the result"
        
       | AGivant wrote:
       | It was a joke in Soviet Union that our Micro calculators are the
       | biggest in the world!
        
       | thedudeabides5 wrote:
       | _To calculate (20 - 8 + 7) it was necessary to press the
       | following keys [C] [2][0] [+ =] [8] [-=] [7] [+=]. Result: 5. To
       | multiply the result, say by 3, the calculation could be continued
       | by pressing the keys: [X] [3] [+=]. A [K] key was used for
       | calculations with a constant._
       | 
       | When you design a product with a a committee of 27 engineers..
       | 
       |  _A group of 27 engineers were assigned to this complex problem.
       | It was a huge project which involved: producing the drawings,
       | circuit and patterns consisting of 144 thousand points required
       | to fit a microprocessor with 3400 elements within a 5x5 mm
       | crystal._
        
         | mNovak wrote:
         | Don't old HP scientific calculators have a similar syntax?
         | 
         | It's actually pretty logical; there's a running total, and you
         | decide what to do with the number you just typed in, after
         | typing it. Costs an extra button press to 'add' the first
         | number to the total, I suppose.
        
           | 7thaccount wrote:
           | No, HP calculators were more efficient it would seem with
           | their RPN.
           | 
           | "20 ENTER 8 ENTER - 7 ENTER +"
           | 
           | So you push 20 onto the stack and then 8 on the stack. Then
           | you hit the minus key which returns 12 and puts that 12 on
           | the stack, then you put 7 on the stack and click the plus key
           | to give you 19.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | FillardMillmore wrote:
       | > In general, the first models of calculators had their own
       | operational language, and the user had to learn the specific
       | procedures related to each calculator. Let's take, for example,
       | the C3-07, the first calculator of the Series "C" manufactured by
       | the Leningrad factory "Svetlana."
       | 
       | Forgive the focus on tangential information, but I'm curious, was
       | this factory named after Stalin's daughter, Svetlana Alliluyeva?
       | If so, it would seem a little strange that the factory would
       | remain in the '70s with this name long after Khrushchev's secret
       | speech and the subsequent de-Stalinization that took place to
       | deconstruct the influence of Stalin's cult of personality. I
       | can't seem to find any real info on the factory with a google
       | search, but does strike me as curious.
        
         | erikbye wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana_(company)
        
           | FillardMillmore wrote:
           | D'oh!
           | 
           | I must have used too many search terms in my query. Thanks
           | for providing the link. Appears the company was founded in
           | the late 1800s, so certainly not named after Stalin's
           | daughter.
        
         | rdtsc wrote:
         | A sibling post noticed it seems to be an abbreviation related
         | to electrical lights, but it is worth mentioning that Svetlana
         | is just a common name. Like say, Jenny or Stacy. A few my
         | teachers had that name, for example. The shortened version,
         | "Sveta" is also common.
         | 
         | It would be different, for example, if it was an extremely rare
         | name shared with Stalin's daughter.
        
           | FillardMillmore wrote:
           | Yes, it would appear it is a common name in Russia. Though,
           | in the late '70s (and perhaps even now), I believe Stalin's
           | daughter was still the most famous person bearing the name.
           | And me being ignorant of both this particular factory and its
           | origins couldn't help but wonder (knowing the Soviet
           | propensity for naming things in honor of the leaders - e.g.
           | Stalingrad, Leningrad, etc.) if there happened to be any
           | relation.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-02-17 23:00 UTC)