[HN Gopher] Walmart Gets Into Health Care
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Walmart Gets Into Health Care
        
       Author : awb
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2020-02-25 18:55 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bloomberg.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bloomberg.com)
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | Hm. Wife had eye check at big box store. The guy said "Oh, you
       | have Macular Degeneration. Nothing to do about it sorry. Just go
       | home and go blind".
       | 
       | She came home in tears of course. So I said "Go to a reputable
       | ophthalmologist and get a real opinion". So she did.
       | 
       | Of course nothing is wrong with her eyes (despite the power-of-
       | suggestion effects she experienced, but miraculously cleared up
       | once she got a reliable exam). The Dr did say "I can see how they
       | made the mistake; you have some small adhesions to your retina,
       | but they'll clear up by themselves"
       | 
       | So no, I'm not going to a big box store to get my medical care.
       | Never mind the price. I'll get a professional, or go without.
       | Can't be worse than our experience at the discount-home-goods
       | place.
        
         | fma wrote:
         | For what it's worth...those eye glasses places are run by
         | optometrists (usually) and not an ophthalmologist. An
         | ophthalmologist has more medical training.
         | 
         | They are all independent of the store and just pay rent. But
         | they are all professionals...
         | 
         | Edit: Also if you have a real medical issue w/ your eye,
         | definitely see an ophthalmologist. Optometrists are for glasses
         | and minor eye issues...they aren't going to be doing surgery on
         | you.
        
         | learc83 wrote:
         | When you get your eyes checked for glasses you go to an
         | optometrist. Doesn't matter if it's big box store or a local
         | guy--they have the same credentials.
         | 
         | An ophthalmologist is an MD who specializes in eyes, and that's
         | who you want to go to when you have a more serious problem. 2
         | completely different things, and not really anything to do with
         | where the optometrist was located.
        
           | JoeAltmaier wrote:
           | So what were they doing, diagnosing and then saying there was
           | no point in getting a second opinion?
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | It sounds like a very incompetent optometrist (and if they
             | weren't one, someone basically impersonating one). They're
             | eye specialists after all who go to a 4-year post-
             | undergraduate program, just not M.D. doctors. At a minimum,
             | they should presumably have told your wife to book an
             | appointment with an ophthalmologist immediately.
        
         | pkaye wrote:
         | So the big box employee was not a licensed professional? Maybe
         | you should report them for dispensing medical advice without a
         | license.
        
       | artemisyna wrote:
       | Very curious to see how this plays out.
       | 
       | There's a bunch of underinsured (or outright not insured) folk in
       | the very locations where Walmart is opening these, so it has the
       | potential to kill a couple of different birds with one stone.
       | From a public benefits side, it gives a path of medical care for
       | those that otherwise wouldn't have it (beyond say, an emergency
       | room visit). It also lower prices by competing against insurance
       | bloat.
       | 
       | In doing so, Walmart (may) be able to create a sustainable
       | business by tapping a market (folk that aren't currently going
       | for medical coverage anyway) that would otherwise be untapped.
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | This could also control costs if government managed systems
         | (Medicare, Medicaid) partner with Walmart to provide payment.
         | Easier to negotiate with Walmart as a single entity versus a
         | network of vision and dental providers across the nation.
        
       | WheelsAtLarge wrote:
       | This is great. Walmart has a reputation to protect so at the very
       | least I can trust what they say.
       | 
       | I've had a hard time getting a dentist I can trust. The business
       | reminds me of car mechanics that are always looking to sell you
       | additional services. And as a layperson, it's hard to know when
       | you are being sold services you don't need. They love people with
       | insurance since they can get them to buy without much pushing.
        
         | the_cat_kittles wrote:
         | are you real? is this really a thing a human person is
         | thinking? what?
        
         | ebg13 wrote:
         | > _This is great. Walmart has a reputation to protect so at the
         | very least I can trust what they say. I 've had a hard time
         | getting a dentist I can trust._
         | 
         | Do you think that dentists don't also have a reputation to
         | protect? What makes you take polar opposite views of the two?
        
           | WheelsAtLarge wrote:
           | It's not the same. I think it's a matter of scale. Walmart,
           | because of its size, will often have more checks and
           | balances. They will not take a chance to mar their
           | reputation. Walmart wants to keep people's trust. It's worth
           | billions to the company. It's not 100% but I feel more
           | comfortable if I'm not constantly being pushed additional
           | services to buy.
           | 
           | Most dentists I've dealt with run their practice as a small
           | business. Usually, it's a few dentists. They need to
           | constantly sell. I understand that they need to stay in
           | business but it's so constant that you never know where you
           | stand.
           | 
           | I'm not saying that all dentists are like that it's just hard
           | to find one that you can trust. Just like car mechanics.
        
             | beambot wrote:
             | Size & reputation seem just as relevant to all the existing
             | medical providers, but that seems to have little impact...
        
           | turc1656 wrote:
           | I get what they're saying. Walmart is literally known by
           | every single person in the country (and outside the country
           | as well). It's much less effective to bitch about getting
           | ripped off by the local DDS and have people see about it and
           | also care about it. If a bunch of people went online and were
           | talking about getting ripped off by Walmart, it could very
           | easily get picked up by the media if the claims were legit
           | and then could affect the stock price.
           | 
           | I think people are also much more likely to talk to one
           | another about the "shitty new Walmart healthcare service"
           | because they know everyone knows Walmart and might use it.
           | It's far less likely that you warn people about one single
           | DDS office in your town unless perhaps that specific service
           | provider came up in conversation.
        
           | agumonkey wrote:
           | Not totally agreeing with op, but I can understand a few
           | differences: you don't complain the same way with a doctor
           | and with a company. people tend to just switch. a brand like
           | Walmart may be subject to a global scrutiny and raise the
           | level globally.
        
       | the_cat_kittles wrote:
       | a large, aggressive for-profit org with a virtually unlimited
       | warchest providing health care? sounds perfect. absolutely
       | nothing bad could come of it.
        
       | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | WhompingWindows wrote:
       | I'm just waiting for these massive corporations to get into the
       | automation of Pharmacy work. I know a number of highly paid
       | (110k+) pharmacists who largely:
       | 
       | A) count pills
       | 
       | B) put pills into orders
       | 
       | C) do retail
       | 
       | D) answer questions/customer service
       | 
       | Meanwhile, the industry is being flooded with new graduates from
       | dozens of schools...If this isn't a case for automation of A-C, I
       | don't know what IS a case for automation in healthcare.
        
         | learc83 wrote:
         | Most of A, B, and C are done by techs. Pharmacists are there to
         | manage the techs. But predominantly they are there to be
         | prevent or be held liable for mistakes and loses/thefts of very
         | high value inventory.
        
         | zachwood wrote:
         | I'm pretty familiar with pharmacy roles and pharmacists do not
         | count or fill pills. That is the job of pharmacy technicians.
        
           | giggles_giggles wrote:
           | Exactly, the pharmacist is there to provide expert advice
           | when you have a complicated prescription or combination of
           | prescriptions. You can tell by these comments that the HN
           | crowd leans young -- not enough people dealing with chronic
           | illnesses who have seen the value in having a consult with
           | the pharmacist when you pick up your medication.
           | 
           | My wife has a handful of chronic illnesses and I want her to
           | be able to ask questions of someone who has been educated in
           | the role, method of action, correct dosages, and possible
           | interactions of her medications.
        
             | WhompingWindows wrote:
             | Exactly, they are there for customer service, not for
             | retail, which is a huge proportion of their duties.
        
               | zachwood wrote:
               | I mean this may be partially true for a retail pharmacy
               | setting, but is much different in a clinical one.
               | 
               | Even in an place like Walgreens where customer service is
               | a big part of the job, the idea that it's all a
               | pharmacist does feels simplistic and reductionist and
               | plainly wrong. There's lots of coordination with the
               | patient's doctor and insurance and other pharmacies they
               | might use.
               | 
               | It's like saying programmers just type into a keyboard.
        
         | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
         | Why would you want to unemploy a bunch of people doing a cushy,
         | fun, do nothing job? What's wrong with you?
        
           | TheSoftwareGuy wrote:
           | To provide lower prices to the millions of people who need
           | medication? That money has to come from somewhere
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
             | Now is not the time to start pretending like we care about
             | sick people.
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | retail/pill counting is fun?
        
             | jacobwilliamroy wrote:
             | As someone whos worked both blue collar and white collar
             | jobs, pharmacist is one of the better gigs out there.
        
               | inpharmaticist wrote:
               | It's an okay gig on average, currently. Chains keep
               | buying the smaller guys out, reducing hours and support
               | staff, increasing demands of metrics, and offering lower
               | and lower pay to new grads. It doesn't help that new
               | schools keep opening and applicant numbers do not
               | increase in quality or quantity. The BLS anticipates 0%
               | job growth in the next 10 years.
        
             | wil421 wrote:
             | Probably not but $110k a year can buy a whole lot of fun.
             | Pill counting is not soul crushing, work to live don't live
             | to work.
        
         | fma wrote:
         | Like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-bNu1yICMw
         | 
         | I saw this (or one like this) in action in China at a hospital.
         | There were 15+ windows to line up for the pharmacy and each one
         | had a lot of 10+ people. I was in shock because in the US even
         | 2 people in like would take forever.
         | 
         | The procedure is, you scan your ID at a machine attached to a
         | pillar. The screen tells you which line to line up in. When you
         | get to the front of the line you hand your card to the nurse
         | the medicine comes down a chute.
         | 
         | The line moved fast. I received my medicine in a matter of
         | minutes. Also I paid for the medicine w/ the doctor that
         | prescribed it - so none of this BS about "oh your insurance
         | doesn't cover this, you haven't met your copay" talk that half
         | the pharmacists seems to spend their time with. The doctor told
         | me what to do with it and fielded any questions.
        
       | ColanR wrote:
       | Fantastic, if this isn't regulated out of existence.
        
         | protomyth wrote:
         | They are following others at this point. A lot of places have
         | "minute clinics". The pharmacy part has more legal problems in
         | some states like ND.
        
       | Analemma_ wrote:
       | This is great news. Every six months I go to the dentist for a
       | checkup and teeth cleaning, and it's always the same: they look
       | at my teeth for a few minutes with the mirror thing, scrape off
       | some plaque with the pointy thing, polish my teeth with the
       | spinning thing, then I do the flouride rinse and leave. It
       | usually takes less than half an hour, and then they bill my
       | insurance $275 for it. It's ridiculous, and there's no way this
       | requires a graduate medical degree, it could be done by someone
       | who took a three-week mail-in training course. Keep dentists'
       | offices with DDS's around for major surgeries or unusual
       | situations, but for routine checkups this is fine.
        
         | schiang wrote:
         | That's why some dental offices hire dental hygienist to clean
         | teeth while the DDS focus on more major procedures.
        
           | Ididntdothis wrote:
           | I thought they all do that. I never had a dentist do my teeth
           | cleaning. The dentist shows maybe for two minutes at the ned
           | and takes a quick look.
        
             | schiang wrote:
             | It probably depends on the dentist. I've never even see a
             | dental hygienist at my dentist's office. It's always the
             | dentist that does everything.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | That's not the norm in the US. Maybe some old-timey solo
               | practices but having dental hygienists do cleaning is all
               | I've ever seen.
        
         | FireBeyond wrote:
         | Took my step daughter to the dentist this morning. An x-ray and
         | impressions. Whole process took 14 minutes. And that includes
         | having her pose for front face and side face photos. Not a
         | dentist in sight, just an assistant.
         | 
         | $600.
        
           | rayhendricks wrote:
           | They billed my insurance $750 for a cleaning, I had to pay
           | $0. Healthcare really is Monopoly money.
        
             | crankylinuxuser wrote:
             | And the fraud there is that they claim it's the dentist
             | whom does it.
             | 
             | Why don't insurance companies crack down on fraud like
             | that?
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure that my insurance company has a standard
               | rate that they will pay out for procedures. And I'm also
               | pretty sure they wouldn't pay for a $750 cleaning.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | That sounds bizarre. Lots of people with medical insurance
             | don't have dental insurance. I do and it covers cleanings
             | but, as I recall, a cleaning is around $100 or so. (I get 3
             | cleanings a year and at different times the insurance I've
             | had sometimes covered the third and sometimes didn't.)
             | 
             | Crowns are around $1200 which I end up covering half of.
             | 
             | In my experience, dental is actually relatively free
             | market. Some providers (like mine) charge a bit more than
             | insurance covers for things like fillings and I just pay
             | it. But, even if you don't have insurance, rates are pretty
             | reasonable for 30-60 minutes of a professional's time. My
             | accountant certainly isn't any cheaper.
        
         | pkaye wrote:
         | The dentist office has to roll up all their costs under the
         | services they provide. So the $275 contributes to all the staff
         | wages and benefits, office space, etc. That is why for example
         | the HVAC repairman charges $300 for changing a $5 capacitor in
         | your AC. Places like Costco/Walmart can reduce the costs by
         | keeping a steady stream of customers and sharing building
         | space, etc.
        
         | anotherman554 wrote:
         | In theory the dentist is supposed to glance over your mouth and
         | screen for gum cancer or other issues. So a three-week mail
         | course is certainly an exaggeration.
        
         | throwaway3157 wrote:
         | > it could be done by someone who took a three-week mail-in
         | training course.
         | 
         | Sounds like you have healthy teeth, but your comment is fairly
         | ignorant of the fact that nearly everything you described isn't
         | done by someone with a graduate medical degree, but generally
         | is done by a dental assistant/hygienist . I wouldn't want
         | someone to touch my teeth if they haven't practiced using the
         | instruments in a classroom. This isn't a programming course..
         | 
         | > Dental assistants receive their formal education through
         | academic programs at community colleges, vocational schools,
         | technical institutes, universities or dental schools. Graduates
         | of these programs usually receive certificates. Although the
         | majority of academic dental assisting programs take nine to
         | eleven months to complete, some schools offer accelerated
         | training, part-time education programs or training via distance
         | education. [0]
         | 
         | [0] https://www.ada.org/en/education-careers/careers-in-
         | dentistr...
        
         | refurb wrote:
         | Isn't it normally hygienists who do the routine work? With a
         | DDS overseeing the process and doing the final exam?
         | 
         | From what I've gathered, dentistry is still very lucrative. I
         | knew a DDS who work 3 days a week and clears over $500K per
         | year.
         | 
         | It will be interesting to see how long that lasts.
        
         | lowercased wrote:
         | needed a root canal a few years back. went to the first local
         | place. got an estimate of $2500. way too much for my blood.
         | called around, got someone else to do it for around $1300.
         | Found out there's actually a guy closer who does most for
         | around $900+. But... I went with the $1300 lady. She was fine,
         | and have been going back since. It's a bit of a drive, but the
         | initial price was enough of a 'trust' factor for me, and I
         | trust now that if/when I need something done, I need it done,
         | and that her price will be reasonable. It might be a bad
         | assumption on my part, but I did have that initial savings
         | years ago. She'd be having to jack up everything else quite a
         | lot to be trying to gouge me, and I don't think it's happening.
         | She's just in a less expensive part of town, generally sees
         | less affluent patients, and everything is priced for that
         | market. That it's a 20 mile drive to get there doesn't bother
         | me.
        
           | protomyth wrote:
           | I can tell you from experience that an improperly done root
           | canal can come back to bite you years later. Had one done by
           | IHS[1] when I was in 6th grade. During my 1st year in college
           | I woke up with mouth pain that was really, really bad. Had to
           | get a parent to come get me and drive me to a dentist. He
           | took x-rays and found out I had an infection growing since
           | the initial root canal[2]. He prescribed antibiotics and a
           | massive pain reliever (Percodan[3]). It took four weeks for
           | the infection to go down enough for surgery. The doctor said
           | it might come back because they might not get it all. It took
           | two more operations (5 and 10 years later) to fix it all.
           | 
           | 1) given what's happened to so many other people, I feel I
           | got off cheap.
           | 
           | 2) no, the IHS dentists did not see this growing and it was
           | probably slowed by the multiple antibiotic prescriptions for
           | step throat in high school.
           | 
           | 3) Took it for two weeks, I'm still amazed I was functional
           | enough to take tests and program. That stuff is a whole lot
           | of don't care in one bottle.
        
             | lowercased wrote:
             | understood. the procedure referenced above was from... gosh
             | now, 9 years ago. no issues with it (I've had other teeth
             | issues but not her fault). Wife had a bad root canal done
             | by a 'fancier' place which went bad a few years later.
             | 
             | Sort of feels like a total gamble, really.
        
       | neonate wrote:
       | https://archive.md/5r5Q2
        
       | hiredman wrote:
       | Walmart using their market power in one industry to charge below
       | market rates in another, driving out competition. This is going
       | to destroy health care options in areas that are already under
       | served.
        
       | dsfyu404ed wrote:
       | Even if it's middle of the road service performed by
       | inexperienced people starting out their careers and looked down
       | on by professionals with more experience (i.e. basically how
       | Walmart tire center is viewed in the automotive world) it still
       | provides an alternative keeping the prices of higher class
       | options in check.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-02-25 23:00 UTC)