[HN Gopher] Why Walking Meetings Work
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why Walking Meetings Work
        
       Author : kawera
       Score  : 56 points
       Date   : 2020-03-09 20:01 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (forge.medium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (forge.medium.com)
        
       | buboard wrote:
       | It's 2020 , time for management science to learn how to do
       | science. No, it isn't science to take a study of individuals
       | solving problems and extrapolating that "walking meetings work".
       | It's bs.
        
         | GuiA wrote:
         | Management science fundamentally cannot be science. There's
         | nothing isolatable or replicable in humans in the workplace (or
         | outside for that matter).
         | 
         | The best you can do is apply statistical approaches to
         | arbitrary abstractions, and the main thing we learn when we do
         | that is that return to the mean is the only thing we can really
         | be sure of?
        
           | WFHRenaissance wrote:
           | Alasdair Macintyre has a good chapter on this in After
           | Virtue.
        
           | buboard wrote:
           | > There's nothing isolatable or replicable in humans in the
           | workplace
           | 
           | That needs proof
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | While nothing might be too strong a statement, several
             | studies have shown things like changing the light level in
             | an office increases productivity - it doesn't matter what
             | your started with or end up with. Given this how can you
             | study the optimal light level in an office?
        
               | buboard wrote:
               | i think you already solved it, the optimal level is
               | "fluctuating"
               | 
               | (btw thanks for the tip! i work at home and will use
               | that)
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | What I assume is being referred to is the Hawthorne
               | Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect
               | 
               | I admit that I was aware of the original interpretation
               | but not the novelty/disruption effect.
        
       | Proziam wrote:
       | I pace when I'm thinking about work stuff. I find that being
       | upright and mobile keeps me more alert and focused than slouching
       | in my chair, in front of a distraction jukebox. Some people I
       | work with like it (though, they joke that I should buy a school
       | with a racetrack to walk around...)
       | 
       | I would _love_ for walking meetings to become the norm. Though, I
       | 'm aware that there's a lot of folks who are the exact opposite.
        
       | jrumbut wrote:
       | The effect of walking on improved conversation is so strong for
       | me I have, for a long time, been wondering why it never caught on
       | in the psychology community.
       | 
       | I wonder how much more effective talk therapy could be if
       | delivered while walking, at the driving range, over table tennis,
       | etc.
        
       | tomashubelbauer wrote:
       | Walking meetings are not accessible. If you have blind, deaf or
       | wheelchair-bound colleagues, walking meetings are a wonderful way
       | to exclude them from participating equally in the workplace.
       | That's of course unless you don't already "solve" this issue by
       | just not hiring such folks.
       | 
       | I really wish people would think about this. And not only in
       | terms of their current workplace demography, but also their
       | prospective future employees.
        
         | Robotbeat wrote:
         | Same for talking. Same for presenting visual information.
         | 
         | The key is to be cognizant of the people on your team. It may
         | be possible to take a "walk" in a wheelchair-accessible
         | location or do some similar activity. The only way to address
         | this is to ask your team and build a culture of trust on this
         | issue.
        
         | pmiller2 wrote:
         | The solution is obvious: you solve the issue by not having
         | walking meetings with people who can't effectively participate
         | in them. Why is that so hard?
        
           | Trasmatta wrote:
           | Also I don't see why a blind or wheelchair bound colleague
           | couldn't participate in a walking meeting (if they wanted to
           | and were comfortable with it).
        
             | gowld wrote:
             | No one is wheelchair-bound.
             | 
             | Some people are wheelchair-enabled to enable mobility.
             | 
             | https://www.newmobility.com/2015/09/dont-say-wheelchair-
             | boun...
        
           | Traster wrote:
           | Because it's not actually obvious who can effectively
           | participate in them. Are you checking your meeting
           | participants for suitable footwear, asthma, underlying
           | allergies, chronic health conditions they'd rather not
           | disclose to colleagues...
        
       | jedberg wrote:
       | Netflix's CEO loves to do walking meetings, and a lot of the
       | other execs follow his example. It's especially nice since the HQ
       | is next to a lovely creek trail.
       | 
       | The only downside is that someone has to take notes, which can be
       | hard while walking, unless you can remember everything.
        
         | gopalv wrote:
         | > The only downside is that someone has to take notes, which
         | can be hard while walking, unless you can remember everything.
         | 
         | For some reason, walking meetings tend to work like a memory
         | palace for me.
         | 
         | Though I walk down a pretty specific set of landmarks and write
         | notes afterwards, which is usually ordered by the walk trail
         | landmarks & a follow-up would usually not need a set of notes
         | either.
         | 
         | There was a time when the smokers used to be the ones to do
         | this as a matter of habit - these days it is much healthier to
         | do walk-talks.
        
           | dvtrn wrote:
           | I thought I'd heard the term "mind palace" before but
           | couldn't remember from where (oh the irony). Google reminded
           | me!
           | 
           | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/secrets-
           | sherlock...
        
         | jfengel wrote:
         | Ah, so he's going for a nice walk rather than doing his
         | meetings while walking from one task to another, Aaron Sorkin
         | style. That makes more sense.
        
           | jedberg wrote:
           | No, we have meetings during the walk.
        
             | tomjakubowski wrote:
             | Yes, but it is taking a round-trip walk for the purpose of
             | a meeting, not squeezing the meeting on the walk from "task
             | A destination" to "task B destination", as would occur in a
             | Sorkin show.
        
               | jedberg wrote:
               | Ah I see what you're saying. Yes, they are often round
               | trips.
               | 
               | But sometimes they can be from one task to another,
               | especially if both people are going to another task
               | (usually another meeting) in the same building.
        
         | AdieuToLogic wrote:
         | > The only downside is that someone has to take notes, which
         | can be hard while walking ...
         | 
         | Perhaps this is a good situation to use something like Voice
         | Memos[0]. This way the scribe can speak the notes and
         | transcribe later.
         | 
         | 0 - https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT206775
        
       | Traster wrote:
       | I have a friend whose boss likes to 'go for a walk' or 'catch up
       | whilst we head over to X'. Naturally she's wearing high heels and
       | it's a fucking nightmare for her.
        
         | speedgoose wrote:
         | Is she forced to wear high heels at work or she simply likes
         | it?
        
         | NikolaNovak wrote:
         | I'm afraid I feel my level of sympathy would be 100% correlated
         | with how mandatory the heels are for your friend :-/
         | 
         | On aside, I'm also (genuinely, not snarkily) curious to
         | understand the "Naturally" part in front of "wearing high
         | heels". Don't get me wrong - I personally think they're a
         | fabulously attractive if completely impractical article of
         | clothing, but it feels like in many places in the world they
         | are far from the norm/regular/Natural assumption.
        
       | pmiri wrote:
       | Saw a comment long ago mentioning that our early nomadic
       | ancestors must have spent much of their time wandering the
       | landscape, probably for miles a day. What neglect do we bring to
       | our brains when we don't do even a fraction of this?
        
         | rurp wrote:
         | I have learned that going for a walk is best way for me to
         | think through a tricky problem. Something about the act of
         | walking around almost immediately kicks my brain into a
         | different mode that can do wonders for my thought process. It
         | has to be a leisurely route though, meaning minimal dodging of
         | cars or interacting with people.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-03-10 23:00 UTC)