[HN Gopher] Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, cou...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules
        
       Author : Tomte
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2020-03-11 19:36 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | pjc50 wrote:
       | For context, the UK has suffered a number of terrorist bombings
       | over the years; explosives are controlled substances, and anyone
       | making them without a license _will_ have the terrorism book
       | thrown at them. Not really much point in spending two decades in
       | Afghanistan  "fighting terrorism" if you're going to let people
       | brew TATP in their bathtubs like the 7/7 bombers.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_July_2005_London_bombings
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Bishopsgate_bombing
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brighton_hotel_bombing : very
       | nearly assasinated most of the government!
       | 
       | https://www.cbc.ca/archives/the-day-an-ira-bomb-claimed-the-... :
       | Queen's cousin murdered by bomb
       | 
       | And previously https://www.irishtimes.com/news/the-devastating-
       | effects-of-a...
        
       | lowdose wrote:
       | The government should have offered him a job instead of treating
       | him as a criminal, especially considering his autism.
        
         | chmod775 wrote:
         | > The government should have offered him a job
         | 
         | As what exactly?
        
           | oh_sigh wrote:
           | Bomb disposal technician?
        
       | tathougies wrote:
       | I mean, you really ought to be able to experiment with explosives
       | in a free country, as long as you're not hurting anyone /
       | planning to hurt anyone. It's obviously legal when companies in
       | the industry do it. Why shouldn't it be for private citizens.
        
         | RareSoft wrote:
         | I was under the impression that like firearms in the UK you
         | need to have special licenses to use explosives that people can
         | apply for https://www.hse.gov.uk/explosives/licensing/how-to-
         | apply.htm
        
       | anfilt wrote:
       | I hate how chemistry can land people in legal hot water due to
       | overzealous government policies. While this example is not in the
       | UK. It's illegal to own certain glassware without a permit in
       | Texas for instance. The glassware is considered a drug precursor,
       | like freaking glassware. Oh also federally the DEA treats
       | Phosphorus as a type 1 precursor to meth. That's a freaking
       | element! An element is illegal/regulated like that is just insane
       | to me.
       | 
       | Anyways a low amount of explosives with no intent to hurt anyone
       | should not be a problem. Even a large amount in a remote area
       | that is away from other people and property should be fine.
        
         | 3pt14159 wrote:
         | In D&D there is a certain type of spell called Power Word Kill
         | which works slightly differently based on the version of D&D
         | you're playing with, but the effect is that it essentially
         | kills a single individual with a single word.
         | 
         | I'm not saying phosphorus should be legal or illegal, but at
         | some point "it's just a packet I sent on the internet" or "it's
         | just a PDF I sent to someone overseas" or "it's just an
         | element" misses the point. In most democratic countries there
         | are procedures for getting what you need if you what you're
         | doing is fundamentally good. Nuclear power plants get uranium.
         | Science researchers get viruses. Anti-virus vendors get
         | malware. A certain degree of limiting the power of individual
         | actors is wise.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | tines wrote:
         | Isn't U-235 an element?
        
           | NikolaeVarius wrote:
           | It's an isotope of Uranium. It's restricted but I'm pretty
           | sure its not illegal to own a small amount of it.
        
             | cwkoss wrote:
             | Not illegal to own uranium ore - I think the restrictions
             | are only on the refined product
        
       | Causality1 wrote:
       | 22 months in jail for making "damp firework" level explosives.
       | What a travesty.
        
       | ty7yt wrote:
       | good for him. he only has one life and he aint spending it in a
       | sandwich factory. hes exploring some of the most exciting
       | chemistry this world has. and its a shame we live in a place
       | where people are terrified and manipulated by tv into thinking
       | anyone who shows interest in these things must be placed in a
       | small room for a long time. 300 gears ago governments would be
       | giving him money and patting him on the back. some people we not
       | not born for this time. a time of sol destroying mortgages,
       | overbearing laws, 1000's of unwritten rules and a general utter
       | boring existence unless you were born into wealth.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-03-11 23:00 UTC)