[HN Gopher] Brighsun's long-range EV batteries to enter industri...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Brighsun's long-range EV batteries to enter industrial trials
        
       Author : bastijn
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2020-04-22 21:10 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newmobility.global)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newmobility.global)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | bassman9000 wrote:
       | Let's take these announcements with a grain of salt
       | 
       | https://hypestat.com/info/newmobility.global
       | 
       | http://brighsunauto.com/En/About.asp?ID=1
       | 
       | https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/gladys-liu-linked-to...
       | 
       | https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2019/12/how-long-can-scomo-...
       | 
       | Given the current events, all these news need some CCP propaganda
       | checks.
        
       | close04 wrote:
       | Link to the source announcement:
       | http://www.brighsun.com/En/NewsView.asp?ID=45
       | 
       | The slightly different websites in different states of
       | abandonment don't inspire confidence though.
       | 
       | http://brighsun.com/Index_En.asp
       | 
       | http://brighsuntech.com/
       | 
       | http://brighsunauto.com/Index_En.asp
        
       | magwa101 wrote:
       | Forget large scale deploy test blah, outfit one car and drive it
       | 1000kms, charge, got another 1000kms, video it, put on youtube,
       | then we're onboard.
        
         | MobiusHorizons wrote:
         | IMO the actually hard part is getting the tech to work the same
         | as it did in the lab when you put it through volume
         | manufacturing. A lot of things seem to go wrong in this phase
         | even when the battery chemistry works well enough to create a
         | hand-crafted battery pack that would actually show long range.
         | I really hope they are successful, but until they can show
         | manufacturing working I will keep my enthusiasm in check.
        
           | ianai wrote:
           | How bout do both?
        
       | vardump wrote:
       | This kind of announcements have been way too many. At this point
       | no matter how amazing battery someone has managed to build in a
       | lab, I don't care unless it's manufacturable in large quantities.
       | There are plenty of amazing batteries that lack that quality.
       | 
       | This all sounds a bit like last Hail Mary for some extra
       | investment.
       | 
       | That said, it would be really cool if the claims are true. I so
       | _want_ this to be true. Just not holding my breath.
        
       | danans wrote:
       | For reference, they are claiming a specific energy of ~2000
       | Wh/kg, whereas current Li-ion batteries are in the 200 Wh/kg
       | range. At least according to Wikipedia, so far the highest
       | demonstrated Li-S battery specific energy is 500 Wh/kg.
       | 
       | They are also claiming a cost of $63/kWh vs $156/kWh for Li-ion
       | today.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium%E2%80%93sulfur_battery
        
         | taneq wrote:
         | That sounds suspiciously good.
        
           | api wrote:
           | Yeah I'm expecting a caveat like "they explode if they reach
           | 40 degrees C" or "they degrade by 20% after 20 recharge
           | cycles."
        
       | znpy wrote:
       | I'm looking forward to laptops that can stay up one week on a
       | charge.
        
         | bdamm wrote:
         | Personal fans that run all day. Tiles that keep working for
         | decades. Traffic lights that can be deployed by police wherever
         | they're needed. E-Bicycles that can outrun and out-range most
         | bus routes. Electric airplanes make air travel significantly
         | quieter and much cheaper. Internal combustion engines made
         | obsolete and reduced to a historical curiosity. Electric
         | scooters dominate worldwide as honda cubs become too expensive
         | to fuel. I want it all.
        
           | vardump wrote:
           | Indeed, this high Specific Energy (~2000 Wh/kg) would be
           | enough to make electric airplanes feasible.
           | 
           | Heck, even high-altitude supersonic electric "jets", because
           | you don't need oxygen to run electric motors!
        
       | rasz wrote:
       | >2103.8Wh/kg
       | 
       | ~10x Tesla
       | 
       | >Trial production of high-power cells, with an expected energy
       | density in excess of 1,000 Wh/kg, is about to begin
       | 
       | oh, so they dont exist yet, explains it
        
         | api wrote:
         | 1000 Wh/kg would be roughly 2X the best currently on the
         | market, so that would be amazing if true.
        
           | vardump wrote:
           | More like 4x. Where can you get anything past about 250
           | Wh/kg?
        
         | mrfusion wrote:
         | Makes me wonder if this came to pass. Could an electric car be
         | too light? Is there a minimum weight a car needs to be?
         | 
         | If the battery got small and you don't have the ice, could it
         | be a problem? Would they add weights?
        
       | barney54 wrote:
       | Lithium sulfur batteries have a lot of potential and I really
       | hope Brightsun's tech works as well (or ever close to as well as
       | claimed). However, I'll believe it when I see it. There are just
       | too many claims about battery tech that don't pan out in actual
       | application.
        
         | NortySpock wrote:
         | Or at least, they pan out in terms of 1% improvements and not
         | 100% improvements like the breathless journalism claims.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-04-22 23:00 UTC)