[HN Gopher] Advancing electrolysis: Splitting water to store ene...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Advancing electrolysis: Splitting water to store energy as hydrogen
        
       Author : elorant
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2020-04-23 12:12 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (inl.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (inl.gov)
        
       | triceratops wrote:
       | Does anyone know if coal or nat gas power plants can burn
       | hydrogen too? Or be retrofitted to burn it? Then you could store
       | excess solar or wind energy generated during the day as hydrogen
       | and burn it at night.
        
         | ChuckMcM wrote:
         | Sure, since the lab is running their perovskite at 600 C
         | anyway, just add CO2 in a chamber with some nickel and get
         | methane out via the Sabatier reaction. Send the methane to
         | where ever its needed.
        
           | eloff wrote:
           | So many problems are solved so easily by "just" doing simple
           | thing X. Maybe this really is a simple fix. It doesn't sound
           | that way to me though.
        
             | ChuckMcM wrote:
             | It's not. The response is 'accurate' not 'easy' :-) The
             | biggest challenge is getting a source of CO2 using less
             | energy than you are going to get back by burning the
             | methane.
             | 
             | Thermodynamics doesn't let you cheat sadly.
             | 
             | When evaluating these sorts of things you follow the energy
             | consumption of each step and remove it from the initial
             | pool of energy. Energy out over energy in will give you a
             | way to compare methods for "goodness" regardless of
             | complexity. Processes that have net negative energy are
             | clearly in the "bad" category. Any positive is something.
             | 
             | Localized schemes like hydro pumping do quite well in this
             | equation. It is distance schemes that suffer.
             | 
             | Distance schemes are hard because pushing electrons through
             | a wire spends power just getting through the wire.
             | Eventually its all gone. This is why you can't just cover
             | 1/3 of Nevada with PV solar cells and power the grid from
             | that one state.
             | 
             | So distance means transforming electricity into some other
             | energy (chemical, potential, kinetic, thermal), moving it
             | physically somewhere else (ideally without much loss) and
             | then converting it back into electricity at the
             | destination.
             | 
             | One of the more fanciful ideas I heard was train cars full
             | of Tesla powerwall packs. If you've ever seen an operating
             | coal fired power plant you may have seen the long line of
             | coal cars in a train that pulls in each day. Once at the
             | plant the cars are slowly pulled through the plant, dumping
             | coal when they need to into the feed mechanism. Eventually
             | a string of empty cars is on the other side to take back to
             | be refilled. Imagine doing that with powerwalls. Cars pull
             | up, connect electrically to the plant and start
             | discharging. Once they are down to their "empty" level the
             | car disconnects and moves on. I think it would be
             | fascinating to watch.
        
       | tln wrote:
       | "the cell was firstly operated at an electrolysis mode with a
       | constant current density of 0.6 A cm-2 for three minutes to
       | generate hydrogen, which was instantly consumed by switching to a
       | fuel cell mode at 0.2 A cm-2 for two minutes"
       | 
       | So, 22% round trip efficiency
        
         | rrmm wrote:
         | Shouldn't you take into account the voltage. From the graphs
         | they don't look like they were symmetrical.
        
           | tln wrote:
           | Doh!
           | 
           | Fig 6c[0] shows ~1.6 in and 0.4v out so... 5% round trip
           | efficiency?
           | 
           | [0]
           | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15677-z/figures/6
        
       | rrmm wrote:
       | Interesting:
       | 
       | I had no idea there was an Idaho National Lab.
       | 
       | The new electrode is a perovskite which is a crystal structure
       | tangentially related to superconductors among other things.
       | 
       | The electrode allows for reversible operation in the 400-600 degC
       | range.
        
         | shodan666 wrote:
         | World's first nuclear power plant (BR-I) was located in IDAHO.
         | That why there are some serious NO-FLY zone in Idaho. NAVY is
         | doing some reasearch out there as well.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-04-23 23:01 UTC)