[HN Gopher] New species of fungus identified via Twitter
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       New species of fungus identified via Twitter
        
       Author : dnetesn
       Score  : 225 points
       Date   : 2020-05-16 10:23 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (phys.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
        
       | kinleyd wrote:
       | With hindsight one could say it was only a matter of time.
        
       | peey wrote:
       | The title here needs to include "..." in the original article.
       | 
       | For a moment, I thought this would be a satirical article,
       | characterizing some group as "new species".
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Ok, we've put fungi in the title above.
        
       | appleflaxen wrote:
       | for the impatient:
       | 
       | yes, it's what it sounds like.
       | 
       | it's a fungus that lives on the reproductive organs of American
       | centipedes.
       | 
       | They noticed it in a tweet, and quickly confirmed it in their
       | museum collections.
        
         | SllX wrote:
         | You missed the most important part. They named a parasitic
         | genital fungus after Twitter.
        
       | wiradikusuma wrote:
       | "I hope that it will motivate professional and amateur
       | researchers to share more data via social media." -- and soon
       | we'll see trolls photoshopping images as "new discovery".
        
       | shultays wrote:
       | Pardon me for nitpicking but how fungus on fish is bizzare?
        
         | kps wrote:
         | Well, this particular fish is a millipede, which you've got to
         | admit is atypical.
        
       | montenegrohugo wrote:
       | > the new species has now been given its official name,
       | 'troglomyces twitteri'
       | 
       | Academia always seems so mature and serious from outside, nice to
       | know there can be some lighthearted humor there too :)
       | 
       | As an aside, do you guys know any other Latin animal names that
       | may have an 'untraditional' origin?
        
         | schwartzworld wrote:
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigiphilus_garylarsoni
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | bitL wrote:
         | Finnish NHL goalie:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaumatodryinus_tuukkaraski
        
         | BLKNSLVR wrote:
         | Frank Zappa has a couple (plus an asteroid):
         | 
         | https://www.nme.com/news/music/frank-zappa-3-1234673
         | 
         | https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/articles/features/7_animals_...
        
         | asxd wrote:
         | Stephen Colbert had a spider named after him, _Aptostichus
         | stephencolberti_ :
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptostichus_stephencolberti
        
         | bsaf wrote:
         | Not Latinified, but a key protein in brain and spinal cord
         | development is called sonic hedgehog.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_hedgehog
         | 
         | The oddest thing was sitting through neuro lectures when this
         | was introduced as if it was the most normal name in the world.
         | We were looking at each other like "are we hearing this right?"
        
           | shpongled wrote:
           | Pretty much all of the proteins that were discovered in fruit
           | flies and have a human ortholog have funny names: frizzled,
           | wingless, piwi, nubbin, etc etc
        
             | twic wrote:
             | The gene which, when mutated, makes flies more sensitive to
             | alcohol is called cheapdate.
        
               | goliatone wrote:
               | > The gene mutated in 'cheapdate' flies is actually
               | called 'amnesiac', named because amnesiac mutant flies
               | originally showed deficits in memory tests [1] I thought
               | it was a joke but apparently not. TIL --- Not the best
               | source but... [1]
               | https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/04/06/inside-the-
               | res...
        
           | chaos_a wrote:
           | >It has been noted that mention of a mutation in a sonic
           | hedgehog gene might not be well received in a discussion of a
           | serious disorder with a patient or their family.
           | 
           | Imaging being told by a doctor that you have sonic the
           | hedgehog disorder.
        
             | jessriedel wrote:
             | Mutations in this genes cause a birth defects called
             | holoprosencephaly that is usually so severe you'd be
             | telling the parents, not the patient :(
        
               | whymauri wrote:
               | I think there was a small movement to have it renamed,
               | but I don't know if it went anywhere or still exists.
        
             | phone8675309 wrote:
             | "I'm sorry, but your son has Sanic's[1] Disease."
             | 
             | [1] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/sanic-hegehog
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | JimDabell wrote:
         | Not quite what you're asking for, but you might be amused by
         | the etymology of "thagomizer":
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thagomizer
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | loopbit wrote:
         | Another one, not mentioned here but one of my favorites:
         | 
         | Psephophorus Terrypratchetti.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | That was terryfic...
           | 
           | I'll add another: Gollumjapyx smeagol
        
         | whymauri wrote:
         | IIRC, the discoverer of the RING protein domain couldn't come
         | up with a name so they called it Really Interesting New Gene
         | (RING) which duos as a pun for a ring finger.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RING_finger_domain
        
         | Sebb767 wrote:
         | Neobuthus Factorio:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neobuthus_factorio
         | 
         | Named after the game Factorio, as the species was discovered by
         | the father of the lead dev.
        
           | BlueTemplar wrote:
           | And it looks a bit like Factorio's conveyor belts, to boot !
        
         | NSCFType wrote:
         | Nothing unusual about the origin on this one, but an amusing
         | binomial nonetheless:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_blackbird
        
           | n3k5 wrote:
           | What's so funny about Turdus Maximus? I have a very great
           | friend in Rome called Turdus Maximus.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | uHuge wrote:
             | Sounds/reads just like turd*-retard or dumb person, I
             | assume.
        
               | mattkrause wrote:
               | It's a joke, sir.
               | 
               | (That and the "In Rome" comment are both references to a
               | classic Monty Python bit from _The Life of Brian_
               | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx_G2a2hL6U)
        
         | jamieweb wrote:
         | There are 4 species of damselfly named after each of the band
         | members of Queen.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heteragrion_freddiemercuryi
        
         | fuzzfactor wrote:
         | OTOH, some good plants are as traditional as you can get.
         | 
         | When Marco Polo got to China, they had some plants & animals
         | that had never been seen back in Europe.
         | 
         | When Western botanists followed over the next few centuries,
         | they brought back specimens. Especially medicinal plants before
         | there were drug companies anyway. It would seem there might be
         | something worthwhile about a material which made it into a
         | pharmacopiea over a period of millennia.
         | 
         | Eventually people started trying to give every different thing
         | a different latin name, and when Linneaus got around to Chinese
         | ginseng he dubbed it Panax Ginseng, simply preceding the
         | Chinese name with panacea-derived "Panax" to classify the genus
         | itself as the most highly regarded in the Far East for treating
         | the widest variety of conditions. This must have also been
         | considered relative to all the other plants that were known to
         | the West for millennia themselves.
         | 
         | American ginseng, known to the natives for millennia on that
         | continent, became Panax Quinquefolius.
         | 
         | Literally _plant with five leaves that can cure many things_.
        
         | globular-toast wrote:
         | There are actually so many "humorous" names of species and
         | proteins that it's not really funny any more.
        
         | sgeorge96 wrote:
         | Look up "seenus peenus"
        
           | haneefmubarak wrote:
           | What are we looking for? The top relevant comment on Google
           | is literally your comment / this thread.
        
         | basjacobs wrote:
         | This fly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaptia_beyonceae is
         | named after Beyonce.
         | 
         | "It was the unique dense golden hairs on the fly's abdomen that
         | led me to name this fly in honour of the performer Beyonce as
         | well as giving me the chance to demonstrate the fun side of
         | taxonomy - the naming of species," Mr Lessard said.
        
         | randoramax wrote:
         | Tafazzin, a human protein named after the fictional character
         | Tafazzi, an improbable wrestler whose super power is to got his
         | own groin therefore causing the opponent to run away in
         | reflected pain.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | It's fairly normal for names of things few people are
         | interested in such as insects and fungi.
         | 
         | https://www.gadgette.com/2016/02/29/these-are-the-silliest-s...
         | mentions, for example, _Pieza pi_ and _Spongiforma
         | squarepantsii_.
         | 
         | Google easily gives you more examples, for example
         | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-worlds-
         | str..., which explains the rules are not very strict: _"The
         | name must not be offensive, must be spelled in only the 26
         | letters of the Latin alphabet and may be derived from any
         | language. In fact, a name need not be derived from anything at
         | all; the rules state that an arbitrary combination of letters
         | is also perfectly acceptable."_
        
           | throw_away wrote:
           | No length limits, huh? Now, just gotta find a novel bug...
           | 
           | edit: heh, you could code some nematode's dna sequence into
           | its name.
        
             | traverseda wrote:
             | Go through the wikipedia list of illegal numbers, encode
             | them into latin letters...
        
           | conistonwater wrote:
           | > _the rules state that an arbitrary combination of letters
           | is also perfectly acceptable_
           | 
           | To be honest, I always suspected this.
        
         | vmception wrote:
         | I haven't encountered a single serious industry.
         | 
         | For example, many terms in finance are satire with a thin
         | veneer of seriousness and professional candor in the name.
         | 
         | Its a game of how long can you keep a straight face when you
         | make up the name quantitative easing. Or when you make a
         | derivative called DOOMs to market as an alternative to Credit
         | Default Swaps, and do studies on payout when the company being
         | bet on defaults.
        
         | unwind wrote:
         | Awesome thread, really cool to hear there are so many. I only
         | knew about the Atlascopcosaurus [1], from working at Atlas (not
         | in any way related to the lizard which was found in 1989).
         | 
         | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlascopcosaurus
        
         | nkozyra wrote:
         | "Spongiforma squarepantsii"
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spongiforma_squarepantsii
        
         | Jugurtha wrote:
         | Phallus impudicus[^1].
         | 
         | [^1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallus_impudicus
        
         | contingo wrote:
         | In the past my research has overlapped a fair bit with alpha
         | taxonomy. Actually, whimsically or unconventionally named
         | species are fairly common. Here are three examples that come to
         | mind.
         | 
         | [1] Forget Twitter, when it comes to species literally
         | "discovered on the internet" I don't think you can top this
         | one. In 2005 or so, specimens of a beautiful and striking sea
         | urchin test, in the genus Coelopleurus, started cropping up on
         | eBay as collectors' items. They were eventually confirmed as a
         | new species. No, they were not named after eBay (the eventual
         | choice of species epithet, 'exquisitus', was entirely fitting),
         | but their status as the first new species determined directly
         | from eBay specimens is pretty interesting, especially in
         | bioconservation terms.
         | 
         | [2] _Spongiforma squarepantsii_ is a fungus described in 2011.
         | If you 've ever eaten a bolete (a cep, or porcini, in foodie
         | speak), then you'll know there are mushrooms where the gills
         | are replaced with a spongey layer of tightly-packed tubes. In
         | its extremely wet habitat, _S. squarepantsii_ has become
         | specialized from bolete ancestors to disperse its spores
         | locally, by rainwater or animal transport, rather than by air,
         | and so the entire fruiting body is reduced to a mass of
         | convoluted sponge. From the Wiki article:  "The surface of the
         | fruit body has deep ridges and folds somewhat resembling a
         | brain. It is sponge-like and rubbery -- if water is squeezed
         | out, it will resume its original shape... when viewed with
         | scanning electron microscopy, [the spore producing-tissue]
         | somewhat resembles a seafloor covered with tube sponges,
         | reminiscent of the fictitious home of SpongeBob... Although the
         | epithet was originally rejected by the editors of Mycologia as
         | "frivolous", Desjardin and colleagues insisted that "we could
         | name it whatever we liked"."
         | 
         | [3] In Borneo the other year I photographed a large, very hairy
         | spider with bright red fangs that turned out to be a male color
         | morph of a species named in 2008 as _Heteropoda davidbowie_.
         | The linked Nat Geo article has more examples like that.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/aug/17/uknews.taxon...
         | 
         | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spongiforma_squarepantsii
         | 
         | [3]
         | https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/10/explore-...
        
         | andai wrote:
         | This one's a protein: Pikachurin
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikachurin
        
         | roberto wrote:
         | Pisenotecus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piseinotecus
         | 
         | The scientist had a dog called "Teco", and he stepped on him by
         | accident. In Portuguese, "pisei no Teco".
        
         | bonzini wrote:
         | Aleiodes shakirae, so named because "parasitism by this species
         | causes the host caterpillar to bend and twist its abdomen in
         | various ways".
        
         | personlurking wrote:
         | Not sure if this counts:
         | 
         | The Puerto Rican tody - a small, colorful bird - has the
         | scientific name of todus mexicanus, even though it's endemic to
         | Puerto Rico (where it's known simply as San Pedrito).
         | Meanwhile, the todus portoricensis is actually a Cuban bird.
         | 
         | Rene Lesson, a French ornithologist, described the birds in
         | 1838, based on information he received from his brother, who
         | had collected some of the species and erroneously noted their
         | provenance. AFAIK, there have been attempts to correct these
         | entrenched errors, but there has been no success in doing so.
         | To further confuse things, there are Puerto Ricans who will
         | refer to the island bird as the todus portoricensis - perhaps
         | as a way of correcting for the error, or just due to the
         | confusion surrounding it.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_tody
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rene_Lesson
        
         | sevencolors wrote:
         | There is a chewing louse named after Gary Larson of The Far
         | Side. :)
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strigiphilus_garylarsoni
        
       | losthobbies wrote:
       | That's a xenomorph
        
         | kebman wrote:
         | For a moment there I thought I was alone, but I see you beat me
         | to it xD Hmm or perhaps it's a little Maker...
        
       | truebosko wrote:
       | > The newly discovered parasitic fungus has now been given its
       | official Latin name, Troglomyces twitteri.
       | 
       | It only took me until 35 to realize these official, scientific-
       | sounding names are part useful, part researchers trolling us.
        
         | sushid wrote:
         | Thankfully these are usually harmless (to us humans, anyway)and
         | slightly funny. There are unfortunate ones like
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_hedgehog#Controversy_sur...
         | out there though.
        
         | swyx wrote:
         | they should have let Twitter name it too in a Twitter poll
        
           | chris_st wrote:
           | Fungy McFungusface.
        
             | Izkata wrote:
             | But that's not where this fungus attaches - something I'm
             | sure the internet would've picked up on when deciding a
             | name:
             | 
             | > The fungi are in a class of their own because they live
             | on the outside of host organisms, and even on specific
             | parts of bodies--in this case, on the reproductive organs
             | of millipedes.
        
               | scollet wrote:
               | Boaty McBoatface
        
             | smnrchrds wrote:
             | Bigus Fungus
        
           | athenot wrote:
           | That would have likely ended in something along these lines:
           | 
           | https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/world/europe/boaty-
           | mcboat...
        
       | wltprgm wrote:
       | since the article mentioned this, since when can people in the
       | scientific field simply share their research data without facing
       | any consequences?
       | 
       | edit: sorry my bad, I realized my question was not making sense,
       | I actually mean they can publish research data if the authority
       | does not approve of it?
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | What sort of consequences do you mean?
        
           | wltprgm wrote:
           | sorry my bad, I realized my question was not making sense, I
           | actually mean they can publish research data if the authority
           | does not approve of it?
        
             | simonh wrote:
             | I don't think there is an authority in Denmark that could
             | stop them, or would even want to. By default in most
             | countries releasing any data is protected under free
             | speech, unless the data belongs to someone else or is
             | protected in some other way, such as if it has military
             | value or is personal data covered by privacy rules.
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | What authority?
        
       | brudgers wrote:
       | _they just found a new type of parasitic fungus via Twitter._
       | 
       | Sometimes, snark is thrust upon us.
        
       | billfruit wrote:
       | I have a few photographs, (may be most people have too,) of a few
       | plants/fungi and animals/insects I couldn't identify, even after
       | consulting resources like Wikipedia. What is the best way to get
       | a species identification from a photograph.
        
         | reportingsjr wrote:
         | Inaturalist is a great starting point! What's really funny is I
         | identified a few millipedes on iNaturalist a couple weeks ago
         | and the Twitter poster in this article (Derek Hennen) came
         | along and narrowed it down for me. Very kind and knowledgeable
         | person!
        
         | neurostimulant wrote:
         | You can post them to various relevant subreddits
         | (/r/whatsthisbug, /r/mycology, etc). Identification requests
         | are very common and people are receiving them well, so you'll
         | likely to get some answers.
        
         | azeirah wrote:
         | Not sure what they're called, but there are subreddits for
         | identifying bugs and plants and stuff
        
           | mkr-hn wrote:
           | Google (or quack) /r/whatisthis and the thing you want to
           | identify. There's a bunch of subreddits like this.
           | 
           | Here's a big list:
           | https://www.reddit.com/r/Whatisthis/wiki/links
        
             | JoBrad wrote:
             | This is one of my favorite subreddits. I don't think I've
             | ever even posted in it. It's like real life Sherlock Holmes
             | sometimes. Quite often people will post a piece of a car
             | involved in a hit and run, and it will be solved in
             | minutes. Or someone will post the oddest looking item, and
             | not only will it get solved, but you'll learn a bit of
             | background that you never knew.
        
         | saadalem wrote:
         | r/whatsthisbug/
        
         | carlinmack wrote:
         | iNaturalist, their license allows your pictures/data to be used
         | in academic research
        
         | MattBlissett wrote:
         | As azeirah writes, subreddits or Facebook groups for people
         | interested in the particular group or location will often help.
         | 
         | For general wild plants and animals (and fungi and everything
         | else) there's a computer vision tool from iNaturalist, which
         | can be used independently [1], or when submitting an
         | observation to the site -- by web browser or in the app. I
         | usually start with that, then look at other observations on
         | iNaturalist and Wikipedia pages for the species.
         | 
         | If the photos are of ornamental plants, I think PlantNet's [2]
         | model is trained on them.
         | 
         | (I work at GBIF[3], where suitable data from iNaturalist[3b]
         | and soon PlantNet is sent, and can then be freely downloaded
         | and used in research etc.)
         | 
         | [1] https://www.inaturalist.org/computer_vision_demo
         | 
         | [2] https://plantnet.org/
         | 
         | [3] https://www.gbif.org/
         | 
         | [3b]
         | https://www.gbif.org/dataset/50c9509d-22c7-4a22-a47d-8c48425...
        
       | 101404 wrote:
       | Twitter can be useful. But that takes work. My block list is
       | probably 10 times longer than my follow list.
        
       | Myrmornis wrote:
       | I may be wrong but I suspect that there are many undescribed
       | types of fungi out there and describing a new species isn't that
       | unusual and there is nothing of interest in the fact that the
       | photo in question was on twitter.
        
         | mkr-hn wrote:
         | They named it _troglomyces twitteri_ because, as far as they
         | know, this is the first time one has been discovered through
         | Twitter.
        
         | jpindar wrote:
         | Many HN readers believe that there is nothing on Twitter except
         | politics and pictures of food, this is a counter example.
        
       | tobr wrote:
       | Maybe I'm being too dismissive, but this strikes me as an
       | equivalent of existing-invention-but-using-a-computer software
       | patents. I just don't see how it's particularly newsworthy or
       | interesting that an image shared on Twitter was involved in the
       | discovery.
       | 
       | It allowed for a headline that made me click, though.
        
         | wpietri wrote:
         | The word news is literally the plural of new, as in new things.
         | This is an new species discovered using a new method involving
         | a relatively new communications medium. And in particular, it
         | involves one of the strengths of this new medium: letting
         | people share things with others that might be interested.
         | 
         | A key difference between social media and older media is who
         | gets to say yes to publication. For this photo to reach this
         | researcher in a previous age, there would have been several
         | people who had the ability to say no. And limited space would
         | mean they'd have a strong incentive to say no. But now it just
         | takes one person to say, "Here's a thing I think is
         | interesting." Every reader also has their own editorial power;
         | they can share and retweet.
         | 
         | So for me, this is interesting because it's showing how the
         | "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" adage applies to
         | literal bugs. That the chaotic nature of Twitter is not just
         | providing me with things I find interesting, but leading to
         | actual scientific advance.
        
         | wyattpeak wrote:
         | I think you might be. Whatever its hype, Twitter (and its ilk)
         | does enable a previously unheard of level of sharing of minor
         | details.
         | 
         | This fungus is exactly the sort of thing which would normally
         | go missing in the vaults of a museum because the five people
         | who ever saw it didn't recognise it as anything interesting.
         | This is such a common phenomenon that trawling through museum
         | collections is a non-trivial source of new species
         | identifications.
         | 
         | The fact that an image normally only seen by a few people
         | should be shared to thousands, and hence a discovery made based
         | on it, is significant because there were few avenues by which
         | it could happen pre-social media.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | I love this story on many levels, but in particular what it says
       | about the "trained eye".
        
       | asimjalis wrote:
       | > The photo shared on Twitter of the millipede Cambala by Derek
       | Hennen. The two red circles indicate the presence of the fungus.
       | 
       | I don't see the two red circles in the picture.
        
         | graphpapa wrote:
         | There are two red circles, but there is nothing identifiable to
         | the untrained eye contained within them.
        
           | erentz wrote:
           | Right. Can someone explain? One of the circles has a white
           | dot in the middle that looks like it could be just dust. The
           | other a faint dark dot in the middle again that looks like
           | maybe just dust or dirt. Nothing really in them that doesn't
           | just look exactly like what's around them.
        
             | gimboland wrote:
             | Hence the phrase "her well-trained eyes" in the article: to
             | her, your last sentence would be false, because she's spent
             | years (maybe decades) working in this field.
        
         | erk__ wrote:
         | They are towards the top of the image, they are much easier to
         | see if you open the image in full
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-05-16 23:00 UTC)