[HN Gopher] Whale fall
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Whale fall
        
       Author : maze-le
       Score  : 419 points
       Date   : 2020-05-17 11:42 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | benwerner01 wrote:
       | Biologists reacting to a Whale Fall discovery:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZzQhiNQXxU
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | zomglings wrote:
         | Was fascinated by the bone eating worms and their symbiotic
         | relationship with the bacteria that digest the fats and oils
         | from bone.
         | 
         | Osedax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osedax
         | 
         | Thanks for the video!
        
         | baxtr wrote:
         | Odly, this reminded me of the classic honey badger video...
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/4r7wHMg5Yjg
        
         | Sharlin wrote:
         | Their excitement made me so happy!
        
           | FartyMcFarter wrote:
           | I'm guessing you're not a whale?
        
             | Sharlin wrote:
             | I mean, I'd love to have my body be so useful after I die.
        
             | exolymph wrote:
             | Oh no. You made a joke. Don't worry, you'll be punished.
        
               | p1esk wrote:
               | _you made a bad joke_ FTFY.
        
           | mudita wrote:
           | Yes! Something that touched me a lot was also that they
           | showed excitement together with some very real competence and
           | detailed knowledge.
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | If you enjoy this at all, you may want to subscribe. The
           | channel is always like this. Fantastic stuff.
        
         | notRobot wrote:
         | That was incredible! Thanks for sharing!
        
         | MrJagil wrote:
         | Tremendous. Are there any great deep sea docs out there?
        
           | throwaway894345 wrote:
           | Blue Planet I and II are top quality.
        
             | BurningFrog wrote:
             | They _really_ are!!!
        
               | throwaway894345 wrote:
               | At least for the second one, they talked about how they
               | invented new camera equipment and imaging techniques.
               | Amazing work!
        
         | aphroz wrote:
         | I really loved hearing them talking in meters
        
           | dredmorbius wrote:
           | But no rhyme.
        
       | EndXA wrote:
       | I found this video for those who want a visual example of what
       | this can look like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZzQhiNQXxU
        
       | simonkafan wrote:
       | I've never heared of this term before and it's interesting to
       | read people's interpretation before they knew what it means.
       | 
       | I thought this may be a colloquial expression of IT
       | infrastructure admins when all their Docker hosts suddenly fail.
        
         | TheSpiceIsLife wrote:
         | I initially thought it might have something to do with _high
         | roller_ [1] gamblers.
         | 
         | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_roller
        
       | unityByFreedom wrote:
       | I don't get it, why is a wiki article #1 on HN?
        
         | ddevault wrote:
         | > On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting.
         | That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to
         | reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that
         | gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
         | 
         | From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
         | 
         | Note that, in general, comments like yours are not appreciated
         | here.
        
           | octocop wrote:
           | Totally agree, ideas like this is why i read hacker news
        
           | gus_massa wrote:
           | I agree. From a recent comment of dang:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22990237
           | 
           | > _A Wikipedia link to something obscure, which most readers
           | won 't have heard of before, about which there isn't
           | necessarily a good general-purpose article or blog post out
           | there, can be a great HN submission._
        
             | dang wrote:
             | See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23117614 and
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23089041.
        
         | Symmetry wrote:
         | Proximately, because it's really interesting. A step beyond
         | that whale falls were mentioned in a good recent SSC post on
         | slack using them as an example of a situation where suddenly
         | there's a lot of slack in some creatures' existences.
         | 
         | [1]https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/05/12/studies-on-slack/
        
           | proto-n wrote:
           | Just what I wanted to link, highly recommended reading to
           | anyone with the time.
        
           | graphpapa wrote:
           | SSC also uses the a whalefall event as a very effective
           | analogy in this older post:
           | 
           | https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/
           | 
           | Which was the first thing to come to mind when I saw this
           | post
        
         | milesvp wrote:
         | I almost knee jerk downvoted you, then decided to give you the
         | benefit of the doubt. You should know, that if a wiki article
         | makes it to the front page on HN, then it is almost guaranteed
         | to be interesting. My experience is that more often than not it
         | was worth at least reading the first paragraph.
         | 
         | HN is a place I turn to to feed my curiosity, and really
         | appreciate that it's not just tech/startup content that makes
         | it's way here.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Other commenters gave great answers, but I'll add that a
         | comment like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23212386 on a
         | submission is a good sign, since it shows just the sort of
         | intellectual curiosity-gratification HN exists for.
         | 
         | There was a similar-but-different discussion at
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23087284 if anyone wants
         | more.
        
         | mmhsieh wrote:
         | I don't think this post deserves downvotes because it is a good
         | question.
         | 
         | I think few people really think of what happens when a whale
         | dies over deep ocean. It apparently has huge nonlinear effects.
         | That is pretty cool in its own right, but there are some
         | practical reasons why many HN readers may like this.
         | 
         | Most of us working in areas where there is a complex interplay
         | of technology, competition, big economic actors, small economic
         | actors, evolutionary incentives, multiscale processes, etc.
         | Whale falls map just enough on what we do such that it is a
         | fresh starting point in thinking about the enterprises and
         | industries in which we work, and just imprecisely enough such
         | that it can spark some new thinking about things that we are
         | working on that we might have missed before.
         | 
         | I used to work for a multibillion dollar enterprise that is
         | averse to public embarrassment. Already I am re-thinking of
         | what really happens when a dying megaproject is sent off to
         | quietly die without canning all of the people, some of which
         | are actually talented and creative.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | I'm just glad that plastic floats.
        
         | pletnes wrote:
         | Not all plastic does. E.g POM, used in car parts and other
         | durable products. Mass density ~1.4x water.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyoxymethylene?wprov=sfti1
        
       | xwdv wrote:
       | Is it possible to do falls for other creatures? For example, a
       | Human fall, where instead of being buried when you die you are
       | lowered into the ocean and allowed to fall deep into its depths,
       | where you become a new ecosystem.
       | 
       | Or perhaps you wouldn't make it all the way down because you'd
       | get eaten all at once by some larger creature? Or destroyed by
       | pressure?
        
       | goatherders wrote:
       | That is among the more fascinating things I've read in a long
       | time.
        
       | grenoire wrote:
       | This makes me wonder whether or not by overfishing (and many
       | other economic activities) at the upper layers of the oceans we
       | have caused significant ecological destruction at the lower
       | layers. How far does the domino effect go?
        
         | xchaotic wrote:
         | It's mentioned in TFA - up to 30% of biomass
        
       | BeeBoBub wrote:
       | Whale fall described in chapter 81 of Moby Dick:
       | 
       |  _Now, this occasional inevitable sinking of the recently killed
       | Sperm Whale is a very curious thing; nor has any fisherman yet
       | adequately accounted for it. Usually the dead Sperm Whale floats
       | with great buoyancy, with its side or belly considerably elevated
       | above the surface. If the only whales that thus sank were old,
       | meagre, and broken-hearted creatures, their pads of lard
       | diminished and all their bones heavy and rheumatic; then you
       | might with some reason assert that this sinking is caused by an
       | uncommon specific gravity in the fish so sinking, consequent upon
       | this absence of buoyant matter in him. But it is not so. For
       | young whales, in the highest health, and swelling with noble
       | aspirations, prematurely cut off in the warm flush and May of
       | life, with all their panting lard about them; even these brawny,
       | buoyant heroes do sometimes sink._
        
         | echelon wrote:
         | It might be me personally, but I can't stand old, long-winded
         | and effervescent writing. My eyes start to jump around in it,
         | and I can't maintain focus. It makes me wonder how our writing
         | and media will be perceived in a hundred or more years.
         | 
         | Entire patterns of thought become antiquated as our
         | communication wiring adapts to the ever increasing pace of
         | society. Social media is driving dopamine hits from shorter and
         | shorter forms of engagement.
         | 
         | It's amusing to think that Harry Potter might one day read like
         | an opaque relic.
        
           | hprotagonist wrote:
           | don't go online for a week and try again.
           | 
           | your brain will click right in.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | See also from 2015: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10657034
        
       | tsjq wrote:
       | this line is so sad. yet another damage caused by humans:
       | 
       | >It has been suggested that the whaling industry has had an
       | effect on the biological pump through the elimination of many
       | large whales, reducing the amount of whale falls. The effects of
       | this on benthic whale fall community assemblages is not well
       | understood.[24] However, it is suggested that the removal of
       | large whales might have reduced the total biomass of the deep sea
       | by more than 30%.[24] Whales stored massive amounts of carbon
       | that were exported to the deep sea during whale fall events.
       | 
       | >Whaling has thus also reduced the ability of the deep sea to
       | sequester carbon.[24] Carbon can be sequestered for hundreds to
       | thousands of years in the deep sea, supporting benthic
       | communities.[24] It is estimated that, in terms of carbon
       | sequestration, each whale is equivalent to thousands of
       | trees.[25]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | pax wrote:
       | Somebody laid a joke there:
       | 
       | > In the past three years whale fall sites have come under
       | scrutiny, and new species have been discovered, _including
       | potential whale fall specialists_
        
         | lukas099 wrote:
         | I was confused by this statement at first, too. I thought it
         | meant 'specialists' as in 'scientists who study whale falls'.
         | But I believe it actually means species that specialize in
         | living in whale falls.
        
       | eevilspock wrote:
       | I used to want my body or ashes buried under a newly planted
       | tree.
       | 
       | If it weren't for the expense and trouble this would cause my
       | loved ones, I would now ask for a burial at sea into the abyss^.
       | So poetic in word and effect.
       | 
       | ^abyssal zone
        
       | popol12 wrote:
       | Funny, I watched an episode of << Our planet >> called << Deep
       | waters >> yesterday that is quite related to this article. Life
       | at these depths is really fascinating.
        
         | quickthrowman wrote:
         | Also from the BBC/Attenborough, there's an episode of _Blue
         | Planet II_ which shows a whale fall and the subsequent process
         | of consumption by different species that follows.
         | 
         | I agree, it's fascinating!
        
       | ctoth wrote:
       | I cannot speculate to the author's reason for submitting this
       | article, but it is interesting to conceptualize our recent
       | civilizational advancements as a Whale Fall made possible by
       | cheap and abundant energy. What happens when we run out of whale
       | to eat?
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | I imagine that the submitter, like me, might have heard about
         | it from the link a few days ago in
         | 
         | https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/05/12/studies-on-slack/
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | haukur wrote:
       | While not exactly the same, the concept of "whale drift" has
       | existed in Icelandic law [1] for almost 8 centuries, and still
       | applies today. It specifies to whom a whale carcass would belong
       | to, depending on the situation, and so forth. The concept of
       | "whale drift" also exists in the Icelandic language, and is used
       | to point out an event as a stroke of great luck.
       | 
       | [1] Hvalreki (whale drift) in Icelandic law, from Jonsbok in
       | 1281: https://www.althingi.is/lagas/150b/1281000.401.html
        
       | mike_n wrote:
       | One reads stories of pork/etc carcasses that aren't being
       | processed right now, perhaps we could ship those onto barges and
       | into the ocean and dump them overboard to seed new pockets of
       | offshore life on the sea floor.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | tsjq wrote:
         | good point, yes. what about the loads of hormones and
         | antibiotics pumped into these? would we want those also to
         | enter the ocean floor biology ?
        
         | FillardMillmore wrote:
         | How could we dump it to the bottom without surface-dwelling
         | scavengers tearing through the carcass?
        
           | Drdrdrq wrote:
           | Besides, when does anything that we try to do to improve the
           | nature, actually help it? Besides limiting our access to it,
           | of course.
        
             | FillardMillmore wrote:
             | That's somewhat fatalistic and cynical, but there's a
             | kernel of truth in your sentiment. We have of course done
             | good and meaningful work when it comes to environmental
             | protections and preservation - sure, we could argue that
             | perhaps we haven't done enough and should do more, but the
             | effort is there.
             | 
             | I'm not sure if our primary goal in "improving nature" is
             | to help "nature" or simply keep nature sustainable for
             | humans and future humans.
        
             | samatman wrote:
             | From what I've been able to gather, scuttling ships to
             | provide artificial reefs works: it increases the surface
             | area of part of the ocean, which in turn leads to an
             | increase in bio-density and species variety.
             | 
             | Note that this is a vague impression of a topic I know next
             | to nothing about; I could easily be wrong here.
        
           | crispyporkbites wrote:
           | Torpedo them down there
        
       | jondubois wrote:
       | This is just like the economy. When a big economic whale falls,
       | it creates opportunities for new smaller entities to evolve by
       | feeding on its carcass.
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | Coal, oil, and gas.
        
         | appleiigs wrote:
         | The govt doesn't allow economic whales to fall/fail.
        
         | zaroth wrote:
         | This would be really neat if it actually happened!
         | 
         | I think we usually see two distinct failure modes; either a
         | company rots from the inside and loses a significant portion of
         | its peak value before finally succumbing to an acquisition, at
         | which point the single acquirer picks their bones dry. Or a
         | massive company fails in a spectacular fashion, like we might
         | see with some airlines in the next few months, but isn't it
         | also true that either they will restructure in bankruptcy or a
         | large single competitor will come and sweep them up?
         | 
         | I guess the difference is that there's nothing in the ocean
         | that can devour a whale in one bite, the only option is for
         | many very smaller creatures to feast on it over a long time
         | period. TFA also mentions a crucial factor is the whale needs
         | to fall in the deep sea, coastal water falls don't result in
         | the same effect. What would be the analogy for the deep sea
         | effect -- to preserve the company over time to allow the
         | smaller entities to "feed" on it?
         | 
         | If there was a way to better emulate the natural effect I think
         | it would be hugely beneficial to _market_ diversity and
         | competition. I think markets continue to evolve in ways that
         | support and encourage monoliths. This long-term trend has just
         | been massively accelerated over the last couple months.
        
       | isoprophlex wrote:
       | Whoa, apparently they are rather important for carbon
       | sequestration!
       | 
       | See the section on the impact of whaling:
       | 
       | > However, it is suggested that the removal of large whales might
       | have reduced the total biomass of the deep sea by more than
       | 30%.[24] Whales stored massive amounts of carbon that were
       | exported to the deep sea during whale fall events. Whaling has
       | thus also reduced the ability of the deep sea to sequester
       | carbon.[24]
        
       | parhamn wrote:
       | Very cool. Given the coming monopoly suits, failing businesses
       | and the political economic discussions, I can see "whale fall"
       | becoming a common analogy.
       | 
       | https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=w...
       | 
       | What happened in October 2019?
        
         | blauditore wrote:
         | A whale fall was discovered (top commend in this thread):
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZzQhiNQXxU
        
           | leethomas wrote:
           | Thank you, I had recorded the definition of "whale fall" on
           | October 16th last year in my log book as I had just learned
           | about it, but I couldn't remember from where or how.
        
         | octocop wrote:
         | I was thinking about this as well, Yahoo was basically a Whale
         | fall
        
       | alangibson wrote:
       | The spacing of them and the specialization of scavengers is
       | surprising.
       | 
       | When I woke up this morning, I had no idea that deep sea whale
       | carcases would constitute an entire hidden global ecosystem, but
       | that's just another day on HN I guess.
        
         | nck4222 wrote:
         | I had the same thought, which made me think how little we know
         | about the ecosystems on earth, which made me think it's even
         | more important to protect the environment. We destroy things
         | before we even know they exist.
        
       | joyj2nd wrote:
       | Here you see an animation of a falling whale...
       | https://giphy.com/gifs/fat-anS1ZNfpzXSjm
        
       | mercurialsolo wrote:
       | What's a whale fall equivalent in internet lore? Yahoo?
        
         | asah wrote:
         | old ISPs and social networks, which are recycled for their
         | users.
        
       | SydneyPumpkin wrote:
       | Whale fall = bitcoin jargon for large market swings
        
         | octocop wrote:
         | The word whale is pretty common in econ slang
        
           | SydneyPumpkin wrote:
           | Don't understand why people are down voting me for this... No
           | sense of humor in HNews...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | mongol wrote:
       | I thought first the article would be about the falling whale in
       | Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
        
         | smoyer wrote:
         | I read it as "Fail Whale" ... between aging eye-sight and on-
         | and-off-again dyslexia, I didn't really stand a chance.
         | 
         | OTOH ... awesome article - thanks for sharing!
        
         | CRASCH wrote:
         | I read "whale fail". I expected an insightful article on the
         | failure of large software projects. smh.
        
         | cproctor wrote:
         | And I thought it was going to be about Zynga's monetization
         | strategy.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | All your data are belong to us? That strategy?
        
         | oaiey wrote:
         | I thought it was about a gamer whale failing.
        
         | cocktailpeanuts wrote:
         | Came here having misread the title as "Whale Fail" and thought
         | it would be about some early days of Twitter where they
         | displayed whales when the server went down.
         | 
         | But actually learned something very cool!
        
           | Jaruzel wrote:
           | To me, 'Whale Fall' makes think of the Hitchhikers Guide to
           | the Galaxy, when the Heart of Gold invokes it's infinite
           | improbability drive to avoid incoming missiles and said
           | missiles turn into a pot of Petunias and a Whale, with both
           | then falling towards the nearby planet at high speed[1].
           | 
           | --
           | 
           | [1] 'I wonder if it [the planet] will be friends with me?',
           | thought the Whale.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | "Oh no, not again!" To this day, I still wonder why the
             | bowl of petunias thought that
        
               | objclxt wrote:
               | > I still wonder why the bowl of petunias thought that
               | 
               | It's covered in the third book! (Life, the Universe, and
               | Everything)
        
               | Drdrdrq wrote:
               | It is an incredible set of books. You can return to it
               | years later and find jokes and references that you missed
               | in first... few hundred readings (don't judge me :) ).
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | Benjammer wrote:
               | Because Arthur Dent keeps killing Agrajag over and over
               | again and he reincarnates into various people and
               | creatures that then are killed by Arthur. The pot of
               | petunias is one such reincarnation.
               | 
               | The entire character arc is basically Douglas Adams
               | taking out his frustration with Jaguar drivers in
               | traffic.
        
             | mrlonglong wrote:
             | Wasn't there was a film where a sentient missile refuses to
             | explode as it wants to live?
        
               | simonh wrote:
               | In Dark Star a sentient bomb gets stuck in the drop
               | mechanism. One of the crew teaches it existentialism in
               | an attempt to stop it detonating, but then it comes to
               | believe its the only being in the universe and decided
               | "Let there be light".
        
               | vidarh wrote:
               | While the sibling comment correctly points out Dark Star
               | as the movie, I'd also like to point out Starship Titanic
               | - Douglas Adams was involved in the game, based on a
               | throwaway line from one of the Hitchhiker novels. Terry
               | Jones novelized the game. Both include a talking bomb
               | where the plot involves distracting the bomb until it
               | looses track and has to start counting down all over
               | again.
        
           | michaelcampbell wrote:
           | I thought the same, but went back further in time to the
           | live-ish news report of the demolition team trying to
           | vaporize a dead beached whale back into the ocean using
           | construction dynamite.
           | 
           | It didn't go well. Classic news blurb though.
        
           | krrrh wrote:
           | Twitter sunk all those countless fail whales only to provide
           | a perfect habitat and breeding ground for scavengers and
           | bottom feeders. What a perfect metaphor.
        
           | siberianbear wrote:
           | Here's what a "Whale Fail" is [1]. In 1970, a whale died near
           | Portland, Oregon and washed up on the beach. The local
           | authorities decided to blow it up using explosives, with
           | awful and unexpected results.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBgThvB_IDQ
        
             | cocktailpeanuts wrote:
             | Haha in a sense this is also a "whale fall". In fact, this
             | is more of "whale fall" than the original article. The
             | whale literally fell from the sky!
        
         | narag wrote:
         | Talking about sci-fi references, my first thought was of a
         | budong.
        
       | meej wrote:
       | A similar phenomenon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurse_log
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-05-17 23:00 UTC)