[HN Gopher] Sonder: E-Ink Keyboard
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Sonder: E-Ink Keyboard
        
       Author : tosh
       Score  : 107 points
       Date   : 2020-05-31 15:57 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (sonderdesign.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (sonderdesign.com)
        
       | beyondcompute wrote:
       | Great concept but to me does not make that much sense. Because
       | there are no extra keys. So what is the point of having re-
       | programmable keys if you'll have to reprogram the keys that you
       | are already using? Function keys are not so useful as they are
       | too far away from main typing area (at least for me). An extra
       | vertical row of keys on the left however would be great. I would
       | order such a keyboard. (Currently I am using an International
       | English one and there's an extra key, SS which I re-programmed
       | with different modifiers for several functions. A whole row of
       | extra keys would be just amazing!)
        
       | yosito wrote:
       | I see lots of people commenting that this sort of keyboard is a
       | gimmick because it's a waste of time to look at keys while you
       | type. As a programmer, I get that logic. But there are times when
       | I would 100% love a keyboard that could allow me to use different
       | key layouts and visually see the layout. The first use-case for
       | me is when switching language layouts. I'm tri-lingual and use
       | different keyboard layouts to be able to type characters in other
       | languages. But every time I switch languages, I forget where the
       | punctuation and other symbol keys have moved to. It's a pain in
       | the ass to have to switch layouts just because I can't remember
       | where a question mark or a curly bracket is in the language I'm
       | using. Second, occasionally do design and video editing on the
       | side. Not often enough to memorize keyboard shortcuts like I do
       | with programming. But especially with video editing, if you're
       | not using keyboard shortcuts and hunting through menus instead,
       | the work is extremely slowed down. Lastly, games. I game from
       | time to time, but each game I play has different controls mapped
       | to the keyboard. I can't usually remember more than 4 or 5
       | controls for the duration of a gaming session, so being able to
       | see what's what would make my gaming experience much more
       | enjoyable.
       | 
       | All that being said, I'm not holding my breath for this keyboard.
       | The design isn't polished enough, I doubt software support for my
       | use cases will be common any time soon, and I just don't see
       | hundreds of little screens being cost effective or reliable
       | hardware. I hope I'm wrong though.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | As a programmer, I'd like a keyboard with "l" and "-" keys
         | beside the usual qwerty keys.
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | Enable the Compose key, then it's just Compose - > for -.
           | 
           | I don't know lambda offhand, but it's possible to define
           | extra mappings if it isn't there by default.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compose_key
        
             | ferzul wrote:
             | but the rules constantly change and at least sometimes
             | require root access - painful when you do that upgrade and
             | now you can't type
        
         | onyva wrote:
         | Totally agree. I'm used to typing Hebrew and lately Arabic
         | blindly on a USA keyboard but sometimes I get stuck and it
         | helps to have a quick look. Problem is I'm mostly in Emacs and
         | with its very own inputs it's not going to help much, unless
         | it's programmable...
        
         | shultays wrote:
         | You can just launch on screen keyboard or search for an image
         | of your keyboard layout. The shortcuts info would be a bit more
         | useful but the keyboard needs to support it on the first place
        
         | tobeportable wrote:
         | You should 100% have a look at text-expansion tools e.g.
         | espanso with https://hub.espanso.org/packages/french-accents/.
         | 
         | The general idea is that you would type something like :e' to
         | type out e. This allows you to use a single keyboard layout
         | across languages.
        
           | ferzul wrote:
           | which is helpful if the three languages are russian, english
           | and japanese
        
         | BiteCode_dev wrote:
         | Plus I can totally see plenty of applications for it:
         | 
         | - fn keys that show what mode you are in. I never know if I'm
         | going to hit F3 or "sound up".
         | 
         | - locking keys: is uppercase is locked or not? Am I at one
         | press for ` ? Have I triggered ^ ?
         | 
         | - show special char combinations: press alt-gr, and the
         | keyboard show you the signs like EUR, $? or | that you can
         | enter.
         | 
         | - per app shortcut displays: imagine, you click ctrl + and all
         | other keys change to show what they can do.
         | 
         | - game shortcuts: when you launch it wasd become arrows, shift
         | become jump, etc
        
           | afandian wrote:
           | This is what the Macbook touchbar is for (with, granted, no
           | tactility). And, to put it mildly, it divides opinion. I
           | really miss my muscle memory for media keys on my mac.
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | The problem of the touchbar is that it has no tactile
             | feeling and literally no allowance for muscle memory. It
             | lets you see what mode your in, but it also requires that
             | you look at it.
        
             | Wowfunhappy wrote:
             | Well, exactly--this is what Apple was going for with the
             | touchbar, except that Apple neglected to complete the
             | circle. Apple expected users to give up tactility in
             | exchange for contextual information; in reality, most
             | laptop users were unhappy with the trade.
             | 
             | This keyboard does both.
        
             | rbanffy wrote:
             | If the touchbar had the same haptic feedback the trackpad
             | has, it'd be awesome.
             | 
             | When people are told the trackpad doesn't move when it's
             | pressed - that it isn't "clicking" in the sense you are not
             | pressing a switch - the first reaction is incredulity.
        
             | BiteCode_dev wrote:
             | The Macbook touchbar is a good concept. The implementation
             | is terrible
             | 
             | You should keep the tactile feedback, and the default keys,
             | only enhance on that.
        
           | abdullahkhalids wrote:
           | Don't know which module they are using, but you won't get
           | partial refresh timers faster than 0.3 seconds, and full
           | refresh timers faster than 2 seconds.
        
       | Stratoscope wrote:
       | Does anyone remember the Samsung Alias 2? It was a dual-hinge
       | flip phone with e-ink keys. When you flipped it open in portrait
       | mode, the keys would display a number pad, and if you opened it
       | in landscape mode the key labels changed to a QWERTY layout.
       | 
       | Photos:
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?q=samsung+alias+2&tbm=isch
       | 
       | Details:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_U750_Alias_2
        
         | a-wu wrote:
         | I had both the Alias and Alias 2. I absolutely loved the Alias
         | because it was so great for texting. The Alias 2 was a cool
         | idea but I felt that the e-ink key refresh was too slow and the
         | keys were mushy.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | mangecoeur wrote:
       | Cheaper than Apple's magic keyboard who's gimmick is... magnets!
       | >_<
        
       | missosoup wrote:
       | That keyboard has been 'available soon' on the sonder site for at
       | least 4 years now. Going to go ahead and call vaporware.
        
       | radarsat1 wrote:
       | I just want to be able to use emacs with an e-ink display... any
       | little machines out there for that?
        
         | freekh wrote:
         | I do that (via termux) with a onyx max boox 3. Works pretty
         | well. I had some quality issues (got 2 dead lines on 2 devices
         | so far) with the actual device but support has been very, very
         | supportive so far so globally I'm very happy
        
         | Y_Y wrote:
         | You can put ssh on a jailbroken kindle
        
           | radarsat1 wrote:
           | I thought about that, is it possible to use it with a
           | bluetooth keyboard?
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | I'd love a full travel keyboard. I'm not sure "Keyboard
       | Enthusiasts" want a Mac style keyboard.
       | 
       | While I don't often need to look at keys when doing normal
       | typing, I still do when programming APL. And I never remember the
       | keys when using After Effects / Premiere. Having programmable
       | caps would be nice.
        
       | TheRealPomax wrote:
       | And here I was hoping it was a normal keyboard, with eink key
       | caps. Instead it's what looks like the worst possible design for
       | implementing a solidly obvious idea.
       | 
       | (I still don't know why people tried this with LED screen keycaps
       | instead of doing eink first, and then were surprised a $250, one-
       | trick keyboard didn't fly off the shelves)
        
         | jarfil wrote:
         | Eink used to be expensive, have slow refresh rates, and no
         | color. OLED screens on the other hand have vibrant colors and
         | can show videos. The concept of OLED keycaps is still superior,
         | but it needs to be realized much better and much cheaper to be
         | a top seller.
        
           | emsy wrote:
           | The problem is that unlike a phone or a tv these will
           | probably be on for the whole workday, so 8h+ with little
           | change to what is displayed and probably at a high contrast.
           | The burn in will probably be an issue.
        
             | teraflop wrote:
             | That's an easily solvable problem -- just have each
             | individual key label bounce around the keycap like a DVD
             | player screensaver.
        
         | Twirrim wrote:
         | The form factor of this and the Apple Magic keyboard are just
         | an ergonomic nightmare.
         | 
         | I have a strong preference for natural / split keyboards, but
         | I'm perfectly content with typing on normal keyboards if that's
         | all that is available. It might take me weeks or months of
         | typing on a standard keyboard before I start to get the aches
         | going in my wrists. I lasted barely half a day with a 2015/2016
         | era Magic keyboard before my wrists started hurting like sweet
         | merry hell. It's far too cramped, forcing the wrists and arms
         | at weird angles, even with the keyboard out at full arm's
         | length. (I find the Magic Mouse to be similarly absurd from an
         | ergonomic perspective. Shape was fine, but having to arch a
         | finger to use it is crazy, and similarly bad for RSI)
         | 
         | I was really curious to see what the offering was here, but,
         | ignoring price, this is just such a terrible, gimmicky choice
         | of form factor. They immediately eliminate a sizeable potential
         | market by choosing this one.
        
         | ashtonkem wrote:
         | $250 is a perfectly acceptable price for the keyboard
         | enthusiast space; but that's not a massive market compared to
         | regular keyboards.
        
       | Gravityloss wrote:
       | Great, finally programming languages can expect even beginners to
       | keep typing characters like [?] with little difficulty. Your
       | editor plugin will also include keyboard customization.
        
       | easytiger wrote:
       | It's a scam and has been around for years
        
       | jrockway wrote:
       | Their website won't load, but it looks like they've been working
       | on a prototype of a keyboard that has e-ink displays on each
       | switch since around 2016.
       | 
       | This has been attempted before:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_Maximus_keyboard but with
       | LCDs (or maybe they were OLEDs, since all the reviewers complain
       | about burn-in). The reviews were overwhelmingly negative and you
       | can pick one up cheap used because nobody wants them.
       | 
       | Overall, I find these designs awfully expensive on many fronts.
       | Looking at the keyboard is a huge productivity sink, and if you
       | stop looking at the keyboard, you won't care what the legends
       | look like. And, having 101 screens attached to your keyboard is
       | pretty costly compared to having 0 screens. I think these make
       | for a good conversation piece, but I'm not sure you'd prefer
       | typing on them to a keyboard with a better layout and better
       | switches. And if you want a macro pad, just get a stream deck,
       | which you can buy with same-day shipping instead of crowdfunding
       | it. (Or just build your own. There are tons of kits out there
       | that cost on the order of $10. No per-key screens though.)
        
         | jarfil wrote:
         | My optimal keyboard would have: mechanical switches, per-key
         | RGB LEDs, MX keycaps with translucent borders to see the LED
         | lights ("pudding" style), per-key legends that would change
         | with the keyboard language and layers.
         | 
         | I only want to be able to look at the keyboard when I'm not
         | familiar with the layout, but I want to be able to do that.
        
         | thomastjeffery wrote:
         | I could see them being useful for keyboard designs with very
         | few keys, like https://olkb.com/collections/planck.
         | 
         | If you have deeply-nested layers, having some way to identify
         | what state your keyboard is in can be helpful. Having screens
         | instead of LEDs is definitely an expensive luxury, though.
        
           | _nhynes wrote:
           | That's an interesting idea, actually. A keyboard that could
           | visually identify state might be useful for education: say a
           | typing or Vim tutor. It'd be kind of nifty if a key started
           | flashing so that you could identify its location (for
           | learning a layout), or had a little icon suggesting "insert"
           | or whatever command it triggers. T'would be an expensive
           | teaching tool, though.
        
           | masklinn wrote:
           | Art.lebedev had full-size keyboards, as well as smaller pads
           | with 3, 6 or 15 keys.
        
           | jrockway wrote:
           | True. Personally I have 3 LEDs on my keyboard that I use to
           | show the current layer (in binary). I then carefully numbered
           | my layers so that I use 0, 1, 2, and 4 in preference to
           | others ;)
        
         | adrianmonk wrote:
         | > _having 101 screens attached to your keyboard is pretty
         | costly_
         | 
         | I wonder if it would be somehow feasible to cut costs by using
         | a projection scheme.
         | 
         | Perhaps each key could be essentially passive rear projector
         | screen, then you'd have a system of mirrors, lenses, prisms, or
         | whatever below the keys so that one DLP or other projection
         | system could hit all the keys.
         | 
         | Maybe having 1 active component and 101 passive components
         | (hopefully all plastic) would make the whole thing a lot
         | cheaper.
         | 
         | Of course, there would be the small matter of building it so
         | the geometry works out where you can have the image hit the key
         | and also have a switch and spring beneath it.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | elric wrote:
       | Reminds me of that OLED keyboard ... Optimus I believe it was
       | called ... I wonder if anything ever came of that, or if it's
       | still vaporware.
        
         | notatoad wrote:
         | it was a real product. possibly still is. IIRC it was over
         | $1000 by the time they released it, and it wasn't a very good
         | keyboard.
         | 
         | the much cooler thing that came out of that project was the
         | "mini 3": https://www.artlebedev.com/optimus/mini-three/
         | 
         | (side note - their website has possibly the best cookie
         | disclosure on the internet)
        
           | masklinn wrote:
           | The Mini 3 was basically the original demo of the concept.
           | 
           | The studio then released the full-size Maximus for $2068
           | using an OLED per key.
           | 
           | They later released the Popularis, originally intended as a
           | cheaper sub-$1000 model using a single large OLED for all
           | keys. They did end up releasing it but with various
           | additional tradeoffs (a "compact" keyboard without a numpad)
           | and at a fairly expensive $1086.
           | 
           | Concurrently, they released cut-down keypads with 6 and 15
           | keys, also at fairly expensive $376 and $534.
        
         | nihilazo wrote:
         | I believe it got a limited release, was pretty awful to
         | actually use, and got very quickly discontinued. Although I may
         | be wrong.
        
           | lallysingh wrote:
           | The keys were too large and hard to push.
        
       | WhatIsDukkha wrote:
       | This is kind of cool but I think has the same problem (though
       | does it better) then the apple function bar thing.
       | 
       | I don't want to look at my hands as I'm working, I want to look
       | at what I'm doing.
       | 
       | Icons on keys also force me to lift my hands from the homerow as
       | 80% of them are obscured by your hand positions.
       | 
       | The value of having the shortcuts on the keys isn't very high
       | compared to a higher quality keyboard and onscreen cheatsheet if
       | needed.
        
       | plerpin wrote:
       | Professional applications, e.g. video nonlinear editing, have a
       | huge number of shortcut keys. You can buy entire keyboards with
       | colored key caps that are labeled with shortcuts for a single
       | application like Final Cut Pro.
       | 
       | Would be great for that.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | See also:
       | 
       | 2016 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12830307
       | 
       | 2015 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9809906
       | 
       | and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9688646
        
       | andrepd wrote:
       | Such a cool idea wasted in copying a trash design... Pity. Apple
       | keyboards are the worst in several aspects.
        
       | wishinghand wrote:
       | Apparently there's some debate whether or not this is a real
       | product, but if it is, I'd love this in a compact keyboard form
       | like a Kyria, Lily58, or Corne. Those keyboards are less than 60
       | keys so they require layers to get at what doesn't fit on the
       | default layout.
       | 
       | This sounds like a hassle but ergonomically it's very good! Your
       | fingers travel and stretch less this way. Someone asked me if I
       | type as fast or faster with my Ergodox. I told them I don't
       | measure but that's not even the biggest feature, but the fact
       | that I'm not moving my whole hand up to the number row for digits
       | and symbols.
       | 
       | The downside to this is that layers are deeply personal and
       | changing them can bring some friction as a user re-learns the
       | layout. I've resorted to screenshotting and printing my layers at
       | times when I try a new paradigm. Having dynamic key labels would
       | be a godsend for this sort of keyboard-user relationship.
        
       | nihilazo wrote:
       | the website doesn't even work for me but I looked up some images,
       | and even if this thing actually exists and isn't vaporware, it
       | looks like a truly bad keyboard. All the things that actually
       | matter in a keyboard (key feel, travel, ergonomics) are all
       | things this design gets dead wrong. It seems mostly modelled
       | after the apple mac keyboard (which has awful key feel and even
       | worse ergonomics) and to be incredibly short-travel. The design
       | also seems to have no respect at all for any ergonomics
       | improvements made to keyboards in the past 20 years.
       | 
       | Also, anybody buying a high-end keyboard will probably be able to
       | touch type anyway, so what is the point of this product even?
       | When you're using a computer, you're looking at your display, not
       | your keyboard.
        
         | thomastjeffery wrote:
         | It's really unfortunate to see how tightly product designers
         | hold on to the traditional staggered-typewriter layout.
         | 
         | People tend to believe that more esoteric designs won't sell,
         | but the $300+ model01 I'm typing this comment with begs to
         | differ. It seems to me like they are targeting the wrong
         | market.
        
           | uncletaco wrote:
           | My ergodox, lily58, atreus, and soon sofle also beg to
           | differ.
        
             | thomastjeffery wrote:
             | Sofle looks nice. I really like the idea of having dials
             | on-board.
             | 
             | The only thing I would miss is the thumb-cluster design of
             | the Model01. Having thumb keys a little farther to the
             | side, and having a thumb-knuckle key is really comfortable.
             | 
             | The extra portability of the lily58/sofle design would be
             | nice, though.
        
         | fortran77 wrote:
         | It's meant for Mac users, not "Keyboard Nerds". I can't imagine
         | there's a market. Mac users want to use a proper Apple product.
         | They'd still use the hockey-puck mouse if Apple still bundled
         | them with the iMac.
        
           | bb88 wrote:
           | Yeah, I felt saddened to see the command, ctrl, alt keys were
           | not programmable.
           | 
           | I get people wanting to design only for the apple devices,
           | but frankly I find lately that I enjoy less branding on my
           | devices/clothing/etc in general, and that includes the
           | windows keys on my laptops.
        
       | moron4hire wrote:
       | This reddit poster is not very encouraging
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/keyboards/comments/ae8x4u/eink_keyb...
        
         | fermienrico wrote:
         | This whole thing sounds like scam. I don't think this keyboard
         | is possible to make at $199. Every piece of eink display under
         | the cap costs a few bucks. Then you need insane custom
         | switching board to multiplex all these displays with SPI lines.
         | Probably needs an FPGA to do it fast and reliably. The raw BOM
         | cost alone will be $100 or more.
         | 
         | Fabbing a custom size eink display will cost $200K in tooling +
         | R&D if only they could find a fab that is willing to do sub
         | 100k MOQ orders. Otherwise, it is upwards of $500k. The thing
         | is, no other customer will ever buy a 12x12mm eink display
         | since it is too small to do anything useful, so the eink
         | display manf cannot ammortize the cost of a new line spin up
         | and tooling. It has to be captured and it will be costly.
        
           | masklinn wrote:
           | > This whole thing sounds like scam. I don't think this
           | keyboard is possible to make at $199. Every piece of eink
           | display under the cap costs a few bucks.
           | 
           | It would most likely have a single large display, like the
           | Optimus Popularis. Uglier and less convenient, but way the
           | hell cheaper.
        
             | mschuster91 wrote:
             | You still pay through your nose for large eInk displays
             | though. I don't get what the fuck makes them so
             | expensive... probably patent issues.
        
               | bransonf wrote:
               | I'd guess low demand as well. Compared to any other type
               | of screen, eInk is extremely niche. E-Readers and some
               | mass produced wearables (Pebble) made it work, but even
               | those had a fairly small market.
        
               | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
               | Pebble wasn't eink, weirdly enough; it was a "Sharp
               | Memory transflective LCD" (which did have very similar
               | properties, granted).
        
           | Palomides wrote:
           | assuming this will ever be real:
           | 
           | based on similar products that use LCDs, it won't have 60+
           | displays, it will use a single large display, and the
           | switches will basically activate a touch screen.
        
       | cordite wrote:
       | I'd like this but with the typematrix layout, which is
       | ortholinear and with enter and backspace in the center.
        
       | orliesaurus wrote:
       | What's the point of Eink on a keyboard? Anyone stare at their
       | keyboard for hours at a time? Isn't Eink is supposed to help you
       | read without screen fatigue?
       | 
       | Why not make Eink spoons and forks next? /sarcasm
        
         | packet_nerd wrote:
         | Learning to type in a new language maybe?
         | 
         | I've used stickers for that before[1] but it would cool to be
         | able change the labels on the keys automatically. :-)
         | 
         | [1] Like this: https://www.amazon.com/HRH-Keyboard-Stickers-
         | Background-Lett...
        
           | Stratoscope wrote:
           | Original IBM PC users may remember a program from 1983 called
           | WordVision that came with keyboard stickers. There's a
           | picture of the sticker sheet here:
           | 
           | https://forum.winworldpc.com/discussion/10869/software-
           | spotl...
           | 
           | It was an idea that really only worked if WordVision was the
           | only app you used on the PC. Plus the stickers got dirty
           | around the edges and came loose after a while.
           | 
           | Fun fact: WordVision was designed by Jim Edlin, no relation
           | to the 'edlin' command line text editor that shipped with MS-
           | DOS and PC-DOS.
        
         | thomastjeffery wrote:
         | Power usage, I suppose.
        
         | dleslie wrote:
         | I'd love to have one in order to switch between Canadian
         | Multilingual, American English, math and symbolic logic.
        
           | ashtonkem wrote:
           | Symbolic logic makes sense, but most keyboard users can touch
           | type in their own locale.
        
             | jarfil wrote:
             | Some people know several languages, but it's difficult to
             | learn a locale well enough to 100% touch type when you only
             | have a keyboard in a single locale, and don't use some of
             | the languages as often as others.
             | 
             | Also, per-software layers with action icons instead of
             | learning alphabetic shortcuts.
        
               | masklinn wrote:
               | It's also difficult to know all alternate layouts by
               | heart e.g. Apple's US International has 4 different
               | layout (shifted, alted and alt-shifted), and while being
               | able to type "@" directly can be convenient I literally
               | never remember it's alt-k, so I hunt through basically
               | all the alt-ed layout until I find it.
        
             | dleslie wrote:
             | I still hunt and peck for accents necessary for Quebecois.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-05-31 23:00 UTC)