[HN Gopher] Papers with Code
___________________________________________________________________
Papers with Code
Author : xzvf
Score : 181 points
Date : 2020-06-02 15:19 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (paperswithcode.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (paperswithcode.com)
| poorman wrote:
| This is great! It always bugs me when I can't find an
| implementation of a paper to reference. I'm much more likely to
| read a paper if there is code associated with it.
| mikehollinger wrote:
| Unfortunately not all entries there have code, but it's a good
| reference site.
| stippenplan wrote:
| Great!
|
| I greatly enjoy publications that provide their implementation
| (or a simplified) version. Playing around with the problems
| yourself, can give a much greater insight and understanding in
| addition to the fundamental, written work.
|
| However, I did encounter situations where providing the direct
| implementation was seen as a bad thing. It was thought of as
| `giving away your advantage' and squeezing out multiple papers
| before even thinking about publishing the code had their
| preference.
|
| It is great to see more and more research publications go
| together with their implementations.
| easterncalculus wrote:
| Simple idea, great idea. Thanks.
| stared wrote:
| This serves pretty much as an extensive Deep Learning State of
| the Art reference. See e.g.
| https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imag....
|
| I am impressed by its content. I use both for research (to track
| progress) and teaching. Previous references:
|
| - Measuring the Progress of AI Research by Electronic Frontier
| Foundation, https://www.eff.org/ai/metrics
|
| - Natural Language Processing Progress https://nlpprogress.com/
|
| are great, but nowhere near Papers with Code, when it comes to
| the completeness, and UI.
| EvgeniyZh wrote:
| Unfortunately, outside of most popular tasks it is much less
| populated. But it's community driven, so I encourage
| researchers from areas for which leaderboards are not populated
| to fill them and try to keep it up to date. It's not hard to
| choose a single task and update the tables and can be very
| profitable for the community.
| dynamite-ready wrote:
| Is this a site that attaches code examples to state of the art
| research papers? This is excellent, if it's extensive.
| w1 wrote:
| It is very extensive. It has a lot of fairly domain-specific
| work.
| pknerd wrote:
| Is it for AI related papers only?
| burkaman wrote:
| The About page says it's just for Machine Learning papers.
| soheil wrote:
| Amazing! Saves so much time not having to read a paper only to
| find there is really no code or very limited code to run. Not
| having delved too deep into this a suggestion would be to add the
| level of completeness of code to each paper. There are times a
| paper has great code included and 80% is there but is missing a
| crucial piece, sometimes the secret sauce, which would render it
| if not impossible to use. This is the case with a lot of OpenAI
| papers.
| ronyfadel wrote:
| Excluding some (e.g. OpenAI) papers that have limited their
| released results for ethical purposes, why would the authors
| generally not include their code?
|
| I remember going through a digital image processing course in
| uni where the final project was to implement a paper and check
| the results, and I remember that our results, when coded were
| different from the paper's authors (although I can't remember
| if it was because we didn't code it like they did or if their
| results were not to be trusted).
|
| It's just so frustrating and borderline disingenuous to publish
| results, mention bits of code, but not include the whole code.
| fblover wrote:
| Great website but too bad it's owned by Facebook. Personally I
| don't feel comfortable that FB will own/manage/control a repo of
| mostly academic research papers.
| cecja wrote:
| Now do one with code that actually delivers the same output as
| the papers.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2020-06-02 23:00 UTC)