[HN Gopher] The Map Is Not the Territory (2015)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Map Is Not the Territory (2015)
        
       Author : nonines
       Score  : 85 points
       Date   : 2020-06-11 10:27 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (fs.blog)
 (TXT) w3m dump (fs.blog)
        
       | cerberusss wrote:
       | A.E. van Vogt wrote a fantastic SF novel based on the concept of
       | "the map is not the territory". It's called "The Players of
       | Null-A", if I remember correctly. It became a trilogy. I've re-
       | read it multiple times and in fact, had just started reading it
       | again. Some things did not age well since it was written in 1946,
       | but overall fascinating stuff.
        
         | mroll wrote:
         | The first book is actually called "The World of Null-A". I
         | picked it up at a local used book store last year and enjoyed
         | it. Haven't read any more of the trilogy yet.
        
           | cerberusss wrote:
           | Ah, thanks for mentioning that. If you get the chance, the
           | other two are pretty great as well. As an aside, one of my
           | favorite authors, Neil Asher, recently blogged about A.E. van
           | Vogt:
           | 
           | http://theskinner.blogspot.com/2020/06/destination-
           | universe-...
        
           | interestica wrote:
           | Even actuallier, the first book was titled "The World of A"
           | but "to reduce printing costs, the 1953 and 1964 Ace Books
           | paperback editions were entitled The World of Null-A, and the
           | symbol A was replaced with "null-A" throughout the text." [1]
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_of_Null-A#Publica
           | tio...
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | One of my favorite sayings is the old Swiss Army aphorism:
       | 
       |  _" When the map and the terrain disagree; believe the terrain."_
       | 
       | It features in this screed I wrote:
       | https://medium.com/chrismarshallny/concrete-galoshes-a5798a5...
       | 
       |  _(Scroll down to "Story Time." It's in that section.)_
       | 
       | I also enjoyed learning about Farnam Street. I've bookmarked it.
        
       | earthboundkid wrote:
       | What's interesting are cases where the map is the territory. The
       | Facebook map of your friends just is the graph of your Facebook
       | friends. The chain of command for the military just is the chain
       | of command. Etc.
        
         | ssivark wrote:
         | Trivially so, but are they even interesting?
         | 
         | Such well-specific label territories are often artificial. Your
         | Facebook social graph is a poor proxy for your actual IRL
         | social network (or whose opinions you interact with the most,
         | etc)
         | 
         | Big bureaucratic organizations (or other less responsive
         | intelligences) often try to force the territory to conform to
         | the map, for convenience of steering, but it seems like there
         | is a significant map/territory mismatch in the generally
         | interesting/important cases.
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | The map says an O-1 outranks an E-7; the territory says a wise
         | O-1 takes cues from their E-7.
        
         | cheschire wrote:
         | Ehhh, the chain of command in the military is defined by
         | regulations (the map) because you never know exactly who is
         | going to be incapacitated at any given moment. Therefore while
         | today a peer platoon leader might have no authority over me, if
         | our company commander is killed tomorrow and my peer has
         | seniority, he may suddenly have command authority over the
         | company.
         | 
         | So while I get your point, I wonder how much people miss the
         | map due to obscure knowledge requirements and think it doesn't
         | exist.
        
       | Tehchops wrote:
       | I wonder if it's even useful anymore to consider mental models in
       | the context of financial markets, even if it's just used as a
       | metaphorical warning sign.
       | 
       | I read an assertion recently that of all the "markets" in human
       | civilization/culture, the financial one is the only one where we
       | have truly have brought maximum resource and human capital to
       | bear. With that in mind, no one is ever surprised when the next
       | fat tail undoes hundreds of millions in mere moments, even when
       | the capital was managed by ostensibly "smart" individuals.
       | 
       | The map is certainly not the territory there, but for the average
       | individual they're going to have a hard time understanding the
       | map, the territory, the map legend, anecdotes about the map
       | etc...
        
         | SuoDuanDao wrote:
         | Financial markets are also unusually tough because it's such a
         | wicked problem. If there weren't so many smart people trying to
         | predict them, they'd be easier to predict.
        
         | segfaultbuserr wrote:
         | > _The map is certainly not the territory there, but for the
         | average individual they 're going to have a hard time
         | understanding the map, [...], the map legend [...]_
         | 
         | It's true in many fields of engineering and scientific
         | research, including geography and map-making. Just see how
         | complex Geographic Information Systems [0] (basically
         | computerized maps) have became.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_information_system
        
         | BurningFrog wrote:
         | The financial markets are aware of the models of them, and use
         | that knowledge to subvert their expectations.
         | 
         | The financial markets may be the biggest intelligent entity
         | that ever existed.
         | 
         | The only way to second guess them is to figure out a tru
         | theory, and _NOT PUBLISH IT_. I expect there are many such
         | theories producing a lot of wealth to people who don 't talk
         | about it.
        
       | bearer_token wrote:
       | Two implications:
       | 
       | 1. We have many maps, models, or concepts - different ways of
       | viewing the same situation. How we choose which map is often more
       | important than the overall accuracy of our maps. Changing
       | perspective often beats getting more accurate data.
       | 
       | 2. There is no reason to have any emotional or sentimental
       | attachment to one's knowledge. Think of "your knowledge" the same
       | way you would think of "your map collection". Edit (or discard)
       | them with extreme prejudice!
        
       | FigmentEngine wrote:
       | even better resource, learn wardley mapping
       | https://medium.com/wardleymaps
       | 
       | how to use maps in business
        
       | setgree wrote:
       | Two great illustrations of this concept from literature come to
       | mind:
       | 
       | * Borges's 'On Exactitude in Science' [0] about a map that is as
       | large and as precise as the territory, which renders it useless;
       | 
       | * the wonderful Eschaton scene in Infinite Jest [1], with Pemulis
       | screaming: "It's snowing on the goddamn _map_ , not the
       | territory, you _dick_!
       | 
       | This point gets made enough over time that one suspects it's an
       | enduring trait of our cognition to mistake the two. It certainly
       | comes up when people present and talk about epidemiology models.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Exactitude_in_Science
       | 
       | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJpfK7l404I -- I think this
       | Decembrists music video does Eschaton wonderfully.
        
         | suryabeep wrote:
         | I saw the title to this post and immediately thought of these
         | two things. I clicked on the comments, and you've already named
         | them. What great writers!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-06-12 23:00 UTC)