[HN Gopher] Doug Engelbart's 1968 demo
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Doug Engelbart's 1968 demo
        
       Author : whatrocks
       Score  : 81 points
       Date   : 2020-06-16 04:04 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.dougengelbart.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.dougengelbart.org)
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Many previous posts, of course, but most of the threads have been
       | a bit less interesting than you might expect from the classicness
       | of the topic. Some of the better ones were:
       | 
       | 2018 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18626215
       | 
       | 2015 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9366039
       | 
       | 2013 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6875879
       | 
       | 2010 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1939458
       | 
       | 2010 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1138879 (Stewart Brand
       | shot the video? who knew)
        
         | mrexroad wrote:
         | My mind was blown when seeing connections [0] between Stewart
         | Brand and many of the folks whose work deeply shaped my
         | thinking about computing and systems. In retrospect, the
         | influence is obvious and it'd be surprising if worked any other
         | way. Which makes me wish CS programs included more courses
         | covering history and philosophy of computing. I think we spent
         | a a week or two on it --- Alan Kay even did a guest lecture ---
         | but I still feel theres tremendous value in focusing on why we
         | are doing what we do.
         | 
         | [0] http://www.dubberly.com/wp-
         | content/uploads/2015/10/Cyberneti...
        
         | mrspeaker wrote:
         | It's not surprising about previous comments: there's not much
         | you can meaningfully add after watching it. It floored me the
         | first time, and I've been (just a lil' bit) disappointed about
         | modern computing ever since!
        
           | saalweachter wrote:
           | One thing I occasionally like to think about -- either in the
           | context of writing a program, or just driving down the
           | highway when my thoughts are wandering from controlling a
           | two-ton vehicle going 65 MPH -- is, What would a computer on
           | an alien spacecraft look like?
           | 
           | Not for how it would be different because aliens are aliens,
           | but because you're presumably looking at something that is
           | the result of thousands of years of iteration and refinement.
           | If you're the Asgard from Stargate, you presumably aren't
           | just doing OS updates and re-skinning your UIs and throwing
           | away your old frameworks every three to five years for the
           | fun of it. At some point you presumably figured out how your
           | software should work, wrote it right, iterated on it until it
           | was essentially bug free, and only extend it as needed within
           | the same set of frameworks, languages and UI paradigms your
           | civilization has been using for hundreds of years.
           | 
           | What does that software look like?
        
             | noir_lord wrote:
             | Possibly nothing like anything we would recognise except at
             | the most basic level I think.
             | 
             | It's possible to imagine their equivalent to a GUI is
             | entirely unlike ours, flat screens work for us because of
             | our visual cortex and narrow field of view/depth perception
             | framework essentially been tricked.
             | 
             | A UI for a something intelligent with a compound eye or ten
             | eyes or whatnot could be very different.
             | 
             | Not to mention if we give said aliens hundreds of years of
             | computers, they would likely arrive at something akin to a
             | neural interface, I mean a computer as a direct expansion
             | of your cognitive ability has to be the end point in user
             | interfaces, you don't even have to think about how to
             | translate what's in your head into something the computer
             | can understand parse, you manipulate it as easily as
             | thinking of a pink elephant in a tutu, it is just _there_.
             | 
             | It would also likely be heavily influenced by their
             | psychology.
             | 
             | What would be fun is trying to create a router between our
             | systems and theirs down the line.
             | 
             | We've had electric computers for a blink in time compared
             | to the wheel, lot of places to go between a Ryzen 3950X and
             | computronium.
        
             | the-dude wrote:
             | It is called a 'web browser' and programmed in Javascript.
             | I am not making this up.
        
               | notkaiho wrote:
               | Is this a reference to the SpaceX manned launch vehicle?
               | Interesting use of "alien spacecraft" if so.
        
               | noir_lord wrote:
               | Could be a reference to the replicator source code from
               | stargate which was the html and js from a bank if I
               | recall correctly.
        
               | notkaiho wrote:
               | Wow, that's ... niche
        
               | noir_lord wrote:
               | Whenever code is on screen I pause and google it if it's
               | recognisably not total gibberish - have done for years,
               | it's always fascinating when it's plausible and funny
               | when it is not.
               | 
               | My most recent one was Netflix's Close, though that one
               | was gibberish, it was just a html form with nonsensical
               | attributes in that case.
               | 
               | Found it, http://thedailywtf.com/articles/Stargate-Code-
               | of-the-Replica...
        
             | codr7 wrote:
             | Frameworks and standards, definitely. But bug free software
             | written do to exactly the right thing won't happen much.
             | We're moving faster and faster, I don't think that's going
             | to change. What seems to be happening more is designing
             | around the fact to avoid disasters.
        
       | server_bot wrote:
       | Would highly recommend the "Advent of Computing" podcast episode
       | on this topic:
       | http://adventofcomputing.com/?guid=3a1d7af237bb48bb985e795c2...
        
       | EGreg wrote:
       | How does this compare from 2020?
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/FG93VxqV0EY
        
       | acd wrote:
       | "The mother of all demos."
       | 
       | Hyperlinking Computer mouse Videoconference
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mother_of_All_Demos
       | 
       | Which influenced Xerox Parc which in turned influenced Apple.
        
         | notkaiho wrote:
         | I wouldn't limit it to just Apple. Literally all of modern
         | computing tools are influenced, to a greater or occasionally
         | lesser extent, by this work.
        
       | whatrocks wrote:
       | I'm not surprised this has been shared many times before, and yet
       | I'm glad people are still discovering it. My journey to
       | Engelbart's demo came through reading "The Dream Machine" book
       | about JCR Licklider, which itself is an incredible computer
       | history record.
        
       | kps wrote:
       | The associated paper is available for free this month.
       | 
       |  _A research center for augmenting human intellect_
       | https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1476589.1476645
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-06-17 23:00 UTC)