[HN Gopher] Osint Amateur Hour
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Osint Amateur Hour
        
       Author : duck
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2020-06-19 07:12 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.secjuice.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.secjuice.com)
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | Of course the sleuths on twitter think they can identify people
       | from clues in photos and often get it wrong with dangerous or
       | disastrous results.
       | 
       | See: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52978880
       | 
       | And: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/nov/12/spike-lee-
       | sued-...
       | 
       | And, of course, reddit and the boston bomber.
       | 
       | Do this for fun, but don't get your pitchforks out
        
       | pintxo wrote:
       | Doing this quite often as we are currently looking for a new
       | house. Real estate offerings here in Germany often omit the
       | actual address. So some research on the actual location is
       | needed. It's fun and reduces the list of possible objects easily
       | without communicating with the realtor.
        
         | thepangolino wrote:
         | Any idea on why the address is not provided?
         | 
         | I just find this practice really annoying and I don't see how
         | it helps sell a property.
        
           | UweSchmidt wrote:
           | It prevents people from showing up randomly and ringing
           | doorbells. The realtor can control the process, inexperienced
           | and stressed sellers are not confronted with strangers
           | 'negotiating'. Mostly it's in the interest of the realtor
           | that their position as a middleman is accepted.
        
             | kortilla wrote:
             | So why isn't that an issue in the US where addresses are
             | openly listed and homeowners aren't harassed?
        
         | pintxo wrote:
         | Standard approach is to check the provided pictures for any
         | containing the roof or parts of it. Color of the tiles, the
         | form of windows etc are good features to look for on a google
         | maps satellite view.
         | 
         | This usually brings up several possible matches. These can
         | often be reduced by checking any interior pictures Including
         | windows showing the immediate surroundings. Adding nearby
         | buildings as features to look out for.
        
       | phreeza wrote:
       | If you enjoy this kind of thing, you may like the Geoguessr game
       | (https://www.geoguessr.com/), and this guy on youtube who is
       | really good at it:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xApbqwtnSzs&list=PL_japiE6QK...
        
         | pintxo wrote:
         | Goeguessr is the best. Remember the day it put me right in
         | front of a street sign basically stating the exact location.
         | 
         | But then in the next game you are placed right on midway island
         | with no clues but sand and some birds...
         | 
         | Fun times
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | Those are amazing! It's striking to me how much better my
         | language knowledge is than his (for example, confidently
         | distinguishing different languages from their scripts) but I'm
         | pretty sure I would do much worse overall.
         | 
         | I feel like he could benefit from ten minutes to two hours
         | looking at
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Language_recognition...
         | 
         | because it could greatly improve his speed and accuracy on that
         | part. :-)
        
         | polytely wrote:
         | That guy (GeoWizard) has an amazing video series where he
         | attempts to cross the whole country of Wales while walking in a
         | straight line [0], it is honestly one of the best things I've
         | ever seen on the internet.
         | 
         | [0]:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7w986ni7_g&list=PL_japiE6QK...
        
       | jiofih wrote:
       | How do you go about completing the challenge?
       | 
       | Identifying its SA is extremely easy with the Dutch text and
       | newspaper names. There is no real hint this is Pretoria and not
       | somewhere else. The satellite photos don't have enough resolution
       | to help find the stop lights (which appear not too common looking
       | at street view).
       | 
       | You can kind of see a double roof in the building in the
       | background, and the road arrangement, but it would take days to
       | manually look at every city intersection.
       | 
       | I guess the easiest approach is to post the image on a forum /
       | twitter and get locals to chime in :)
        
         | executesorder66 wrote:
         | There is no Dutch text. It is Afrikaans.
         | 
         | And as a South African, I would immediately know it was SA just
         | by the look of the traffic lights and street signs.
         | 
         | I agree that there is no way to know which city it is in the
         | first photo.
         | 
         | In the article there is the line: "Some quick Googling revealed
         | several universities in Pretoria, and I decided to wing it and
         | take a closer look at the Pretoria skyline."
         | 
         | That's glossing over a very important part of figuring it out.
         | Because once you know which city it makes it much easier.
        
         | aj3 wrote:
         | A red square is a shop sign. Apparently there are a number of
         | these "friendly shops" around in ZA, unfortunately they don't
         | have website and Google Maps does not list all of them. You can
         | also see part of the text on the building "*ville mansions".
         | Again, Google Maps does not have this building nor
         | Bing/OpenStreetmaps, but still it's possible that there is some
         | sort of registry of ZA businesses which you could query to get
         | potential addresses. It is also clearly spring on the second
         | photo and the shadows are well defined, so you can approximate
         | time of day (midday) and street directions (shadows point north
         | or so). You can see that these are four way crossroads with at
         | least one road being just two lanes wide, there are at least
         | two buildings on the corners and along one side of the road
         | there is a longish green zone / possibly a park. I think there
         | is a bus stop on the road with the park as well. Not sure what
         | are the FH markings on that yellow thingy and what's that blue
         | square with yellow something. These might be street signs that
         | are specific to some region/city, so just browsing random
         | locations in ZA could turn something up.
         | 
         | This info wasn't enough for me to figure out the location, but
         | it's something. If I was serious about the challenge or there
         | was way to monetize this, I could write OpenStreetMaps / Google
         | Street View scraper that would figure out the location in a
         | matter of minutes.
        
       | TheHeretic12 wrote:
       | 4Chan is notorious for doing this successfully, with even less
       | detail to start with. The large anonymous crowd of viewers and
       | poster is highly likely to contain people who can identify even
       | the smallest detail. Within the past few years, a few remarkable
       | ones stand out to me:
       | 
       | 1. Locating terrorist training camps by high voltage power lines
       | visible in the background.
       | 
       | 2. Shia LeBeouf's IRL Super Capture the Flag, "He Will Not Divide
       | Us," located and vandalized no less than 5 times. The last one
       | used astronavigation principles, and visible contrails from
       | airplane traffic.
       | 
       | 3. Identifying muggers in crowds based on nothing more than
       | biking gear and facial hair.
       | 
       | The one thing these had in common, was a sustained call for
       | effort. By keeping the limited original details available and
       | obvious, people in every timezone and demographic could view
       | them. This greatly increases the odds of specialist knowledge or
       | community insiders being able to add information to the detail,
       | which goes back to the general audience, forming an action
       | feedback loop.
       | 
       | Amatuer hour indeed, but when you have 10000 random people you
       | get results pretty quick.
        
         | wizeman wrote:
         | Yes, but then again, Reddit also did the same thing right after
         | the Boston marathon bombing and as I recall it went pretty
         | badly, as they ended up identifying the wrong person as the
         | culprit and his mom ended up receiving threats from random
         | people (he was missing at the time). He was later found dead in
         | a river and it turned out he had killed himself.
        
       | GEBBL wrote:
       | Cool write up! It reminds me of the amateur osint that was
       | carried out after Donald Trump showed the aerial photo of the
       | Iranian power facility (iirc) and people were able to work out
       | the exact coordinates and flight path of the satellite that took
       | the photo from using the shadows on the ground. Amazing.
        
         | kl4m wrote:
         | This one? "Trump Tweets Sensitive Surveillance Image Of Iran"
         | https://www.npr.org/2019/08/30/755994591/president-trump-twe...
        
       | ricardo81 wrote:
       | First clue I noticed from the 1st photo was they seem to drive on
       | the left hand side, which is fairly rare. The language on the
       | signs obviously is a great clue.
        
         | cgriswald wrote:
         | Not just language, but brands can help a lot as well.
         | Newspapers, obviously, but even a brand of soda can narrow
         | things down.
         | 
         | I think a better approach on his second step would have been to
         | search "<major city> skyline", preferably in order from largest
         | population to smallest. South Africa isn't that big. I think it
         | pays to be more methodical and work with the information you
         | know, before speculating. Speculating is great if you're stuck,
         | but I think he mostly just got lucky there.
        
       | bradknowles wrote:
       | But they never took that information and went back to the first
       | photo to figure out where it was taken.
       | 
       | Or am I missing something?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-06-20 23:00 UTC)