[HN Gopher] Show HN: Browse recently expired, pronounceable doma...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Browse recently expired, pronounceable domain names (Part
       II)
        
       Author : TheMask01
       Score  : 73 points
       Date   : 2020-07-01 18:48 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (decentdrops.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (decentdrops.com)
        
       | pdxandi wrote:
       | This is great, but most of these don't seem that pronounceable to
       | me.
        
       | anirudhmurali wrote:
       | Is it possible to add a column with the Page Rank or Domain
       | Authority of the particular domain?
        
         | TheMask01 wrote:
         | You know I briefly looked in to it because I'm not dumb I
         | understand it'd make this unstoppable, but there's very few
         | options with very high prices. You never know with what the
         | future holds but yeah, not cheap. Definitely doable though.
         | 
         | The good thing about 'our' filtering is that it would take down
         | the number of daily requests to their API, but still...a. lot.
         | I wouldn't say it's out of the question even remotely, I have
         | the funds but am cautious with my finances/investments. But
         | you're right and I should definitely give it some serious
         | though..
        
           | edoceo wrote:
           | PR matters less these days but if you're going that route
           | then maybe also pull Alexa, Ahrefs and Moz and the like (I've
           | got a complete list somewhere)
        
       | iampims wrote:
       | This is neat. After browsing for several pages, I'm yet to find
       | something that is a decent name.
       | 
       | In a similar space, I really like https://park.io
        
         | doh wrote:
         | Surprising. I just purchased couple that I found there. My rule
         | for a domain is that needs to be easy to pronounce, preferably
         | it's not a real word, doesn't have many Google results for the
         | name, doesn't contain w/v, i/y and h.
         | 
         | So for instance snuno doesn't mean anything, 5 letters, easy to
         | pronounce in all language, people don't get confused when you
         | pronounce it. The name eventually becomes associated with
         | whatever you put in.
         | 
         | After I saw Mt.Gox taking off, I realized, that the name is
         | challenge only initially. People will figure it out once they
         | think there is value.
        
         | pdxandi wrote:
         | I've spent an embarrassing amount of time looking at domain
         | names over the years. This is going to cost future me hours.
         | Thanks for sharing!
        
         | airstrike wrote:
         | > I'm yet to find something that is a decent name
         | 
         | If you agree "naming is hard", then most names are by
         | definition pretty bad... At best, this list is random, and at
         | worst it's the set of terrible names people gave up on and
         | allowed to expire
        
       | TheMask01 wrote:
       | If anyone's wondering why the results started looking a tad more
       | strange (and higher rate of unavailable domains on the list),
       | it's because todays list was just processed over the course of
       | the past. ~20min. Have some jobs spread out a little to be nice
       | to the server and inconsistencies.
       | 
       | For the next who knows maybe hour or so, from this minute
       | actually, you'll probably notice a few more than average domains
       | one the list are already taken. Don't worry i've got my best
       | robot people on it
        
       | zeveb wrote:
       | a) Really awesomely cool!
       | 
       | b) Kinda sad to read all those names and think that someone once
       | thought, 'hey, this could be my baby.' Sure, I imagine a bunch of
       | them were just hoovered up by domain squatters, but at least a
       | few of them are failed sites, right? ... right?
        
         | shahinrostami wrote:
         | w.r.t. b), it looks like you can figure out which were
         | legitimate sites using the "Insight" column!
        
         | ObsoleteNerd wrote:
         | Yeah a lot of them are very clearly failed projects and
         | businesses and it's fascinating reading through them.
        
         | DEADBEEFC0FFEE wrote:
         | Certainly a bit sad. I cannot read those domains without
         | imagining what the story behind them was.
         | 
         | Justinandsam.com is just heartbreaking.
        
       | andrefuchs wrote:
       | Useful service, congrats on the launch. Do 4 character domains
       | basically never drop or why is the minimum length 5?
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | There's at least one 4-character domain in the results (easier
         | to find when you set max to 4), `xuci.org`. So they do drop.
        
           | a_t48 wrote:
           | If you squint your...ears it almost sounds like "sushi.org".
           | Not bad.
        
       | eganist wrote:
       | Thanks for this, found a diamond in the rough.
       | 
       | Good on you for restricting people from sending "4" or less for
       | the character count; I'd probably hide that too and use that for
       | my own needs in your position, though it only raises the barrier
       | from opportunistic searchers to people with a mild amount of
       | curl/grep knowledge.
        
         | TheMask01 wrote:
         | I don't own a single one nore have tried but I understand many
         | would. Honestly I did that 100% because they're simply always
         | taken by bots on the spot. It'd be a waste of space on the
         | site/cluttering the feeds. Our process is muchhhh slower around
         | the clock as we check all domains and delete any no longer
         | avail, again to keep the lists tidy, it'd only get everyone's
         | hopes up just to have them let down. I can guarantee it
        
           | henryfjordan wrote:
           | If I did want a 4 letter domain, how would I get one? Is the
           | best way to pony up a few grand for one? I plugged a few into
           | a domain-name service and some were available for as little
           | as $3k...
           | 
           | 5 letters, however, $8.99!
        
       | TheMask01 wrote:
       | Ha. So here it goes I guess, I've been working on this pretty
       | consistently for too long now (backend mainly).
       | 
       | Inspiration for the project was based off one I made over half a
       | decade ago. And I gratefully got recognized on HN for it! I saw
       | (my) username that posted it, tried a few of my go-to password
       | 's, and boom, I still got it :)
       | 
       | Here was the thread for a trip down memory lane
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20160322215116/https://news.ycom...
       | 
       | And the new one is called DecentDrops.com - Would have totally
       | used DomainInferno again but looks like some squatter had it, hey
       | that's what I get for neglecting I guess. Still not sure why..
       | Updated daily. Sorry I'm bad about rambling and don't want to do
       | a (bigger) wall of text but if you've got questions shoot em!
        
         | dang wrote:
         | That thread still works!
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9025800.
         | 
         | I didn't see any differences with the archive.org page. It
         | would be interesting if there were some.
        
       | shange wrote:
       | R.I.P. cryingbitches.com, gone before I even knew her
        
         | TheMask01 wrote:
         | Oh now that's decent!! Which one of you picked it up. I'll pay
         | top dollar!
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | xkuc wrote:
       | Thanks for the service! I found a decent 4-letter that I can use
       | as a pseudonym for political blogging now ;) Grade A!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2020-07-01 23:00 UTC)